Best Of
Re: why make subclassing if passives work only with pure class?
like seriously, why add subclass system if its only useful if u combine grave lord, animal companion and Deadrick summoning (for ultimate pet build)? sins passives work only with pure class with class skills slotted
passives need subclass effects other vise subclassing is useless, currently u loose more with subclassing then gain, its low key scam
Simple.
Subclassing should never have been added to the game, at least not in its current form.
- No one asked for it.
- No one expected it.
- And frankly, it doesn’t make any sense.
Ideally, it should be removed entirely. But since that’s unlikely, I just hope ZOS reworks it to the point where it’s no longer worth using, similar to what happened with Oakensoul. It used to be great; now it’s just.... useless.
Athory
14
Re: why make subclassing if passives work only with pure class?
Mistake of youth. This relatively new game is constantly looking for a new mechanics nobody asked for.
P.S. Hope subclassing can be just wiped off in next updates; it would be the best outcome.
P.S. Hope subclassing can be just wiped off in next updates; it would be the best outcome.
imPDA
24
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Classes and Abilities
Nope I main both warden and templar, as I prefer casual play, so nerfing tide born and empower, both of which are not meta in any way or shape just shows how the combat team don't even play their own game, so please don't pigeon hole me into false accusations of playing a dk when I dont.
Re: Why Soloed Dungeons are forbidden in the new Golden Pursuit??
SilverBride wrote: »Pushing and forcing players into groups is just going to push them away.
it works, too.
my playtime on eso has dropped from hours to minutes almost overnight.
working as intended?
Color me "just wow". Pursuit has barely been up for 9 hours, the seals are obtainable completely through solo activities, and you're claiming that you're going to turn off the game (one supposes for the next week since that's how long the pursuits lasts) because you can't get an emote and a pet without grouping? Just wow.
DoofusMax
13
Re: PSA for those unhappy with "forced grouping" GP -->
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Doesn't having a companion out counts as grouped anymore?
In this specific case it doesn't. It specifically states "grouped with at least 1 other player".
Just tested it out
"defeat x world bosses while grouped" works with companions even if it states "with another player"
"complete x dungeons while grouped" & "kill x foes while grouped" don't work with a companion.
However, I can't tell if "grouped" or "with another player" is somehow affected by other players in joining the combat encounter. I highly doubt it and think it's just inconsistent wording.
Re: Can we please have some "down time"?
There’s another level of devious here.
The complaint is “I feel compelled to do everything but I am burnt out.” Essentially, the complaint is to have a period where special rewards are not offered. But… if you don’t do the tasks, do already don’t get the rewards. But that’s not enough to just ignore the tasks and rewards; no, nobody should have rewards.
So it really looks like “I don’t want other people to get rewards because I personally am burnt out.”
ESO is an MMO, which means they want you to have lots to do. Nothing to do means dead game. It’s up to us to not make it a job.
And if it does feel like a job? Stop. You’re not being forced to play. You’re not being forced to run writs to keep a guild alive. If you are not having fun managing your guild and it leaves you no time for anything else and all of your officers are leaving and nobody from the guild is pitching in… then maybe consider folding the guild. If people wanted the guild active, they’d help run it. And you deserve to do what you want to.
The complaint is “I feel compelled to do everything but I am burnt out.” Essentially, the complaint is to have a period where special rewards are not offered. But… if you don’t do the tasks, do already don’t get the rewards. But that’s not enough to just ignore the tasks and rewards; no, nobody should have rewards.
So it really looks like “I don’t want other people to get rewards because I personally am burnt out.”
ESO is an MMO, which means they want you to have lots to do. Nothing to do means dead game. It’s up to us to not make it a job.
And if it does feel like a job? Stop. You’re not being forced to play. You’re not being forced to run writs to keep a guild alive. If you are not having fun managing your guild and it leaves you no time for anything else and all of your officers are leaving and nobody from the guild is pitching in… then maybe consider folding the guild. If people wanted the guild active, they’d help run it. And you deserve to do what you want to.
tomofhyrule
19
Golden Pursuit 'Prepare for the Night Market'
Golden Pursuit 'Prepare for the Night Market'
Complete 5 Quests
Complete 10 Quests
Complete 15 Quests
Complete 3 Dungeons While Grouped
Complete 5 Dungeons While Grouped
Complete 10 Dungeons While Grouped
Defeat 1 World Boss While Grouped
Defeat 3 World Bosses While Grouped
Defeat 10 World Bosses While Grouped
Kill 50 Foes While Grouped
Kill 100 Foes While Grouped
Kill 200 Foes While Grouped
Complete 1 Trial
Complete 6 Undaunted Pledges
Complete 12 Undaunted Pledges
Complete 3 Battlegrounds with a Guildmate
Complete 5 Crafting Quests
Complete 15 Crafting Quests
Loot 5 Treasure Chests
Harvest 50 Resources from the World
Twenty options, rewards at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16.
As covered in a number of other threads already, ten pursuits explicitly require being grouped with another player, and a further one to three effectively do (depending on how comfortable you are soloing six or twelve Undaunted Pledges within one week). In contrast to previous Golden Pursuits, none of these accept a Companion as 'grouping'.
Edit: Chilly-McFreeze posted in another thread that 'Defeat x World Bosses While Grouped' appears to work with a Companion after all.
Complete 5 Quests
Complete 10 Quests
Complete 15 Quests
Complete 3 Dungeons While Grouped
Complete 5 Dungeons While Grouped
Complete 10 Dungeons While Grouped
Defeat 1 World Boss While Grouped
Defeat 3 World Bosses While Grouped
Defeat 10 World Bosses While Grouped
Kill 50 Foes While Grouped
Kill 100 Foes While Grouped
Kill 200 Foes While Grouped
Complete 1 Trial
Complete 6 Undaunted Pledges
Complete 12 Undaunted Pledges
Complete 3 Battlegrounds with a Guildmate
Complete 5 Crafting Quests
Complete 15 Crafting Quests
Loot 5 Treasure Chests
Harvest 50 Resources from the World
Twenty options, rewards at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16.
As covered in a number of other threads already, ten pursuits explicitly require being grouped with another player, and a further one to three effectively do (depending on how comfortable you are soloing six or twelve Undaunted Pledges within one week). In contrast to previous Golden Pursuits, none of these accept a Companion as 'grouping'.
Edit: Chilly-McFreeze posted in another thread that 'Defeat x World Bosses While Grouped' appears to work with a Companion after all.
JeroenB
15
Re: Why Soloed Dungeons are forbidden in the new Golden Pursuit??
SilverBride wrote: »Pushing and forcing players into groups is just going to push them away.
it works, too.
my playtime on eso has dropped from hours to minutes almost overnight.
working as intended?
Lylith
12
Re: Lack of sanitary items
Even the bankers tell me I'm too fragrant... We definitely need more bathroom stuff!
Re: Should 4v4v4 (3 Teams) Battleground mode become permanent again?
2 teams has its strengths; when the teams are balanced, it's a great way to have a competitive/sweaty GvG. The objectives themselves are also better balanced in 2 team since they promote engagement a bit more (but only slightly, and with the exception of Chaosball that is 100% better in 3 team).
However, those two things don't really matter when 9/10 matches in 2 team BGs are a straight steam roll with one team sitting in spawn and the other team waiting for them to drop out of spawn. It's agonizing how rare it is to have a decent match in 2 team BGs because there's no X factor, no comeback mechanic, and little to no possibility of the weaker team overpowering the stronger team unless they get a fill player that ends up turning the tide.
3 team BGs are much more consistently enjoyable just for the sheer fact that you are constantly fighting in them. There are very few instances of one team being pushed all the way to their spawn for the entire match, and while it does still happen occasionally (especially in Deathmatch games), the third team means that there's still always an opportunity to push out of spawn and that the leading team is never totally safe.
The skill/power/gear/healer gap, whatever you want to call it, has to be much higher in 3 team BGs in order for the map to be a boring spawn camp fest. It happens almost every match in 2 teams.
However, those two things don't really matter when 9/10 matches in 2 team BGs are a straight steam roll with one team sitting in spawn and the other team waiting for them to drop out of spawn. It's agonizing how rare it is to have a decent match in 2 team BGs because there's no X factor, no comeback mechanic, and little to no possibility of the weaker team overpowering the stronger team unless they get a fill player that ends up turning the tide.
3 team BGs are much more consistently enjoyable just for the sheer fact that you are constantly fighting in them. There are very few instances of one team being pushed all the way to their spawn for the entire match, and while it does still happen occasionally (especially in Deathmatch games), the third team means that there's still always an opportunity to push out of spawn and that the leading team is never totally safe.
The skill/power/gear/healer gap, whatever you want to call it, has to be much higher in 3 team BGs in order for the map to be a boring spawn camp fest. It happens almost every match in 2 teams.
