If you feel like you should give up then give up. This game may not be suited for you.
@NeoBeastX
I'm laughing so hard right now. Your signature. Are you really that proud you've dumped that many $$$ into virtual items, to list them all and show them off?
I'll never be able to take you seriously. Ridiculous.
Callous2208 wrote: »For the people that are mad that former/upset players are here posting complaints:
Just about every single business I know of would KILL to be able to know their former/upset customer's opinions. A lot of times in business, you lose customers and you have no clue why.
You have people here doing lengthy critical analysis pieces and having intelligent discussions, and you think this is bad for the game or company?
I think you just don't like reading it.
People are going to complain about products that change or they don't like. Businesses actually appreciate the feedback.
Now if YOU don't like it, the back button is up there. Trying to insult former players as stalkers is not going to change how all consumers react to poorly performing products. If my car gets recalled, am I allowed to go on the forums and complain about it? Years later, after I have sold it, am I within my rights to use my experience to advise others not to purchase that car? Can I relate my experiences in a conversation, even though they are negative?
I think the main issue is that a small minority have decided this is a poorly performing product. Then a few others who share that opinion have flocked here to heap praise and ataboys on those individuals, excited that someone agrees with them. Nothing wrong with that opinion, but let's not just act like it's anything other than that, an opinion. Am I not within my rights to tell you I think the game is great, getting better everyday, and think you are wrong? Am I not within my rights to question why someone would waste their time discussing things they don't like, on a forum for the thing they don't like or play anymore? If people don't like coming to forums where everyone doesn't click agree and share their opinion, the back button is at the top of the page ya know.
If you feel like you should give up then give up. This game may not be suited for you.
@NeoBeastX
I'm laughing so hard right now. Your signature. Are you really that proud you've dumped that many $$$ into virtual items, to list them all and show them off?
I'll never be able to take you seriously. Ridiculous.
jnjdun_ESO wrote: »If you feel like you should give up then give up. This game may not be suited for you.
@NeoBeastX
I'm laughing so hard right now. Your signature. Are you really that proud you've dumped that many $$$ into virtual items, to list them all and show them off?
I'll never be able to take you seriously. Ridiculous.
LOL The schedule is even funnier.
jnjdun_ESO wrote: »If you feel like you should give up then give up. This game may not be suited for you.
@NeoBeastX
I'm laughing so hard right now. Your signature. Are you really that proud you've dumped that many $$$ into virtual items, to list them all and show them off?
I'll never be able to take you seriously. Ridiculous.
LOL The schedule is even funnier.
A small minority? So do you think the majority of people that have tried ESO think its great?
Is that why so many campaigns went away? Is that why the game went B2P?
*blabla*
Here is the thing. We are here to voice our unhappiness. You are here, not to make counter arguments, but to argue against us participating in the conversation to begin with.
*more blabla*
If you have to fly from London to NY, do you suggest the pilot how to fly? No, you don't.
Given the lack of action on cp free campaigns, painful fragmented loot, and other curious choices Zos has made...my answer is yes. Yes I am giving up on Zos. It took a while, but i would be foolish to keep coming here and annoying people about the same issues. Zos have their priorities, and while i hate it i understand that I am simply not one of them. Thank you Zos...you have cured me of my Elder Scrolls addiction. There are just too many other good games out there that are fun and do not punish me for not grinding, and they are going to make several hundred dollars that SHOULD have been going to Zenimax. But why would I give money to people who ignore me? Why would I pay someone to make a game better for other people and worse for me?
I have hope for the future, but it is dim and in need of some TLC. When Zos show they are equally concerned about what I want from ESO as they are the grinding/ganking crowd they seen to mostly cater for, I might consider coming and having another look. But they'll have to advertise well cuz I don't think I'm going to bother checking the forum anymore for updates.
A small minority? So do you think the majority of people that have tried ESO think its great?
Dude,
Yes, the majority is satisfied.
Positive: 177
Neutral: 23
Negative: 53
Source:
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/the-elder-scrolls-online-tamriel-unlimitedIs that why so many campaigns went away? Is that why the game went B2P?
As a matter of fact the subscription market in general is shrinking. All the MMO games together had worldwide 30.6 million subscribers in 2010 and 23.4 million in 2014.
There's too much competition from F2P and B2P. And on the Consoles people are less in the mood to pay for an extra while they are already paying for PS+ and the equivalent on Xbox.*blabla*
Here is the thing. We are here to voice our unhappiness. You are here, not to make counter arguments, but to argue against us participating in the conversation to begin with.
*more blabla*
I don't mind that people complain. It's the style that bothers me. Mostly it's like:
"OMG ZOS is all *PEEP* and the dev team is even more *PEEP*. Fix my personal issues, or I leave!"
And their suggestions to improve the game are just crap. Real crap. Which is normal because they are not game designers.
If you have to fly from London to NY, do you suggest the pilot how to fly? No, you don't.
If you have to fly from London to NY, do you suggest the pilot how to fly? No, you don't.
A small minority? So do you think the majority of people that have tried ESO think its great?
Dude,
Yes, the majority is satisfied.
Positive: 177
Neutral: 23
Negative: 53
Source:
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/the-elder-scrolls-online-tamriel-unlimited
Is that why so many campaigns went away? Is that why the game went B2P?
As a matter of fact the subscription market in general is shrinking. All the MMO games together had worldwide 30.6 million subscribers in 2010 and 23.4 million in 2014.
There's too much competition from F2P and B2P. And on the Consoles people are less in the mood to pay for an extra while they are already paying for PS+ and the equivalent on Xbox.*blabla*
Here is the thing. We are here to voice our unhappiness. You are here, not to make counter arguments, but to argue against us participating in the conversation to begin with.
*more blabla*
I don't mind that people complain. It's the style that bothers me. Mostly it's like:
"OMG ZOS is all *PEEP* and the dev team is even more *PEEP*. Fix my personal issues, or I leave!"
And their suggestions to improve the game are just crap. Real crap. Which is normal because they are not game designers.
If you have to fly from London to NY, do you suggest the pilot how to fly? No, you don't.
You can point to Metacritic, and I can point to these forums. Tons of people have greyed-out friends lists, but I guess I can invite Metacritic to group with me. I guess we are vocal minority here, but 250 votes on Metacritic doesn't really make your case. A forum full of actual, legitimate proven players makes mine. I can tell just by the activity and missing names that it is slowing down and people are unhappy.
I'm only stating my opinion of where the game is going. As a player and customer since beta, do I have that right? Does my criticism have to be perfectly and eloquently stated to be valid in your eyes? Does this forum not exist in part for players to voice opinions. This is the General Discussion forum for Elder Scrolls Online.
Like I said in the part of my post that you shortened to *blabla*, please tell me how I am wrong. How about you address the actual issues here, instead of attacking the people that raise them?
-Exploits being allowed to continue
-Last-minute, game breaking changes to Imperial City DLC
-Reduction in relevant endgame areas
-Reduction in gear setups
-Loss of important methods of playing (Trials, DSA, Leaderboards)
-Elimination of large scale pvp in Cyrodiil
Do you want to make analogies about how people discuss the game? Or do you want to actually talk about the matter at hand?
And if the airlines set up a discussion forum for customer to discuss the flights, I would certainly offer my opinion. I'm not telling ZOS how to boot the servers, or code the engine, I'm only discussing my opinion of the game changes.
Because that's partly what this forum is for.
You can point to Metacritic, and I can point to these forums. Tons of people have greyed-out friends lists, but I guess I can invite Metacritic to group with me. I guess we are vocal minority here, but 250 votes on Metacritic doesn't really make your case. A forum full of actual, legitimate proven players makes mine. I can tell just by the activity and missing names that it is slowing down and people are unhappy.
I'm only stating my opinion of where the game is going. As a player and customer since beta, do I have that right? Does my criticism have to be perfectly and eloquently stated to be valid in your eyes? Does this forum not exist in part for players to voice opinions. This is the General Discussion forum for Elder Scrolls Online.
Like I said in the part of my post that you shortened to *blabla*, please tell me how I am wrong. How about you address the actual issues here, instead of attacking the people that raise them?
-Exploits being allowed to continue
-Last-minute, game breaking changes to Imperial City DLC
-Reduction in relevant endgame areas
-Reduction in gear setups
-Loss of important methods of playing (Trials, DSA, Leaderboards)
-Elimination of large scale pvp in Cyrodiil
Do you want to make analogies about how people discuss the game? Or do you want to actually talk about the matter at hand?
And if the airlines set up a discussion forum for customer to discuss the flights, I would certainly offer my opinion. I'm not telling ZOS how to boot the servers, or code the engine, I'm only discussing my opinion of the game changes.
Because that's partly what this forum is for.
You can point to Metacritic, and I can point to these forums. Tons of people have greyed-out friends lists, but I guess I can invite Metacritic to group with me. I guess we are vocal minority here, but 250 votes on Metacritic doesn't really make your case. A forum full of actual, legitimate proven players makes mine. I can tell just by the activity and missing names that it is slowing down and people are unhappy.
I'm only stating my opinion of where the game is going. As a player and customer since beta, do I have that right? Does my criticism have to be perfectly and eloquently stated to be valid in your eyes? Does this forum not exist in part for players to voice opinions. This is the General Discussion forum for Elder Scrolls Online.
Like I said in the part of my post that you shortened to *blabla*, please tell me how I am wrong. How about you address the actual issues here, instead of attacking the people that raise them?
-Exploits being allowed to continue
-Last-minute, game breaking changes to Imperial City DLC
-Reduction in relevant endgame areas
-Reduction in gear setups
-Loss of important methods of playing (Trials, DSA, Leaderboards)
-Elimination of large scale pvp in Cyrodiil
Do you want to make analogies about how people discuss the game? Or do you want to actually talk about the matter at hand?
And if the airlines set up a discussion forum for customer to discuss the flights, I would certainly offer my opinion. I'm not telling ZOS how to boot the servers, or code the engine, I'm only discussing my opinion of the game changes.
Because that's partly what this forum is for.
798 people gave it on average a 7.8
That would not happen if the game was trash.
Sure, you have the right to state an opinion. But if you come in my restaurant, shouting that my food is *PEEP* and that I'm *PEEP* then I guide you to the exit. Even if me or my food are really *PEEP*.
We all have issues with the game. And everyone thinks 'his' issues are the most important ones. It isn't.
Be patient, if your issue is a real issue, sooner or later they'll fix it.
Are you going to respond to the list of issues I posted, or are you just here to make fun of people and ask for their stuff?
You want to have a real discussion? Here is your chance.
Callous2208 wrote: »For the people that are mad that former/upset players are here posting complaints:
Just about every single business I know of would KILL to be able to know their former/upset customer's opinions. A lot of times in business, you lose customers and you have no clue why.
You have people here doing lengthy critical analysis pieces and having intelligent discussions, and you think this is bad for the game or company?
I think you just don't like reading it.
People are going to complain about products that change or they don't like. Businesses actually appreciate the feedback.
Now if YOU don't like it, the back button is up there. Trying to insult former players as stalkers is not going to change how all consumers react to poorly performing products. If my car gets recalled, am I allowed to go on the forums and complain about it? Years later, after I have sold it, am I within my rights to use my experience to advise others not to purchase that car? Can I relate my experiences in a conversation, even though they are negative?
I think the main issue is that a small minority have decided this is a poorly performing product. Then a few others who share that opinion have flocked here to heap praise and ataboys on those individuals, excited that someone agrees with them. Nothing wrong with that opinion, but let's not just act like it's anything other than that, an opinion. Am I not within my rights to tell you I think the game is great, getting better everyday, and think you are wrong? Am I not within my rights to question why someone would waste their time discussing things they don't like, on a forum for the thing they don't like or play anymore? If people don't like coming to forums where everyone doesn't click agree and share their opinion, the back button is at the top of the page ya know.
Companies are aware of the fact that 80% of all complaints come from 20% of total customers.
If you have nothing constructive to add, please stop responding to my posts.
I would love to see your source for the above, unless its warm and dark then no thanks.
In Internet culture, the 1% rule is a rule of thumb pertaining to participation in an internet community, stating that only 1% of the users of a website actively create new content, while the other 99% of the participants only lurk. Variants include the 1-9-90 rule (sometimes 90–9–1 principle or the 89:10:1 ratio),[1] which states that in a collaborative website such as a wiki, 90% of the participants of a community only view content, 9% of the participants edit content, and 1% of the participants actively create new content.
The 1% rule states that the number of people who create content on the Internet represents approximately 1% (give or take) of the people actually viewing that content. For example, for every person who posts on a forum, generally about 99 other people are viewing that forum but not posting. The term was coined by authors and bloggers Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba,[3] although earlier references to the same concept[4] did not use this name
I would love to see your source for the above, unless its warm and dark then no thanks.
Best I can do atm.. Its, not quite what I remember, but, last time I read something was prob 10 yeas ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%_rule_(Internet_culture)In Internet culture, the 1% rule is a rule of thumb pertaining to participation in an internet community, stating that only 1% of the users of a website actively create new content, while the other 99% of the participants only lurk. Variants include the 1-9-90 rule (sometimes 90–9–1 principle or the 89:10:1 ratio),[1] which states that in a collaborative website such as a wiki, 90% of the participants of a community only view content, 9% of the participants edit content, and 1% of the participants actively create new content.
The 1% rule states that the number of people who create content on the Internet represents approximately 1% (give or take) of the people actually viewing that content. For example, for every person who posts on a forum, generally about 99 other people are viewing that forum but not posting. The term was coined by authors and bloggers Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba,[3] although earlier references to the same concept[4] did not use this name
Whyn Aurum wrote: »-topic:
Call the Diablo 3 rescue crew to pull ESO back up - only solution.
*blabla*
The devs in that game also communicate with the players, when something doesn't work as expected, they tell the players what they have experienced, the problems they have encountered getting it working etc, and in many cases knowledgeable players have come up with solutions to the problems and the devs have happily implemented them.
*more blabla*