N1LegionXDeath wrote: »from the maint topic:
The North American megaserver will be brought down at 6:00am EDT / 11:00am BST on Wednesday, April 30th.
The European megaserver will be brought down at 5:00am BST / 6:00am CEST on Thursday, May 1st.
wingnamrwb17_ESO wrote: »Seriously? AU and SEA players getting the short end of stick again? Twice a week for regular maintainance + often 'ad hoc' maintainance. Almost 1/3 of the paid time is not available for playing and you expect us to continue subscribing?
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »N1LegionXDeath wrote: »from the maint topic:
The North American megaserver will be brought down at 6:00am EDT / 11:00am BST on Wednesday, April 30th.
The European megaserver will be brought down at 5:00am BST / 6:00am CEST on Thursday, May 1st.
Any formal estimates on how many hours/days this downtime will take?
thageecub18_ESO wrote: »More amateur MMO management...
sParkSnare wrote: »@shanna, if you don't like checking the website regularly, subscribe to the RSS feed for the server status section.
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »Any formal estimates on how many hours/days this downtime will take?
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »wingnamrwb17_ESO wrote: »Seriously? AU and SEA players getting the short end of stick again? Twice a week for regular maintainance + often 'ad hoc' maintainance. Almost 1/3 of the paid time is not available for playing and you expect us to continue subscribing?
In case you haven't noticed, most players don't care how little playtime they get, so Zeni doesn't care if a handful of players get upset.
Sad but true.
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »@shanna, if you don't like checking the website regularly, subscribe to the RSS feed for the server status section.
Pretty sad when it is the customer's job to find out if they service they are paying for is actually going to be provided...
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »Any formal estimates on how many hours/days this downtime will take?
All i know is my gut says maybe . . .
cjmarsh725b14_ESO wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »wingnamrwb17_ESO wrote: »Seriously? AU and SEA players getting the short end of stick again? Twice a week for regular maintainance + often 'ad hoc' maintainance. Almost 1/3 of the paid time is not available for playing and you expect us to continue subscribing?
In case you haven't noticed, most players don't care how little playtime they get, so Zeni doesn't care if a handful of players get upset.
Sad but true.
Most players don't care if they can play the game? I think there might be something wrong with your logic.
jayssenrwb17_ESO wrote: »It is pretty clear that Zenimax are really struggling with their mega server. Relatively small patches taking over 4 hours are laughable really. The constant lag, unknown errors, phasing issues.....ugh. Poor Zenimax.
sParkSnare wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »@shanna, if you don't like checking the website regularly, subscribe to the RSS feed for the server status section.
Pretty sad when it is the customer's job to find out if they service they are paying for is actually going to be provided...
Not sure why you quoted me... Shanna mentioned she doesn't appreciate needing to check the website regularly to learn the status of current/planned maintenance. As such, I offered an alternative to checking the website for server info. Nothing in my post was related to whether anything is or is not "the customer's job to find out if they [sp] service they are paying for is actually going to be provided..."
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »
Especially in light of the fact that the skilled technicians at GW2 do patches on the fly.
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »@shanna, if you don't like checking the website regularly, subscribe to the RSS feed for the server status section.
Pretty sad when it is the customer's job to find out if they service they are paying for is actually going to be provided...
Not sure why you quoted me... Shanna mentioned she doesn't appreciate needing to check the website regularly to learn the status of current/planned maintenance. As such, I offered an alternative to checking the website for server info. Nothing in my post was related to whether anything is or is not "the customer's job to find out if they [sp] service they are paying for is actually going to be provided..."
And my comment was on the fact that the servers are down so often, and for such long period of times, that paying customers need some kind of update service to be able to guesstimate when the server will be up so they might be able to play.
sParkSnare wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »sParkSnare wrote: »@shanna, if you don't like checking the website regularly, subscribe to the RSS feed for the server status section.
Pretty sad when it is the customer's job to find out if they service they are paying for is actually going to be provided...
Not sure why you quoted me... Shanna mentioned she doesn't appreciate needing to check the website regularly to learn the status of current/planned maintenance. As such, I offered an alternative to checking the website for server info. Nothing in my post was related to whether anything is or is not "the customer's job to find out if they [sp] service they are paying for is actually going to be provided..."
And my comment was on the fact that the servers are down so often, and for such long period of times, that paying customers need some kind of update service to be able to guesstimate when the server will be up so they might be able to play.
I know what your comment was about, and it had nothing to do with my suggestion to Shanna. In other words, there wasn't any reason to quote me. If you want to complain about something, you can do so without quoting an unrelated post.
jayssenrwb17_ESO wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »
Especially in light of the fact that the skilled technicians at GW2 do patches on the fly.
I know. It is almost entering into the realm of being just plain embarrassing for them. Oh well. Hopefully they will start to get a grip on the technology and not need to take phenomenally long to apply patches. Can you imagine how long the servers will be down for Craglorn? lol, probably another 12 hours, and then days and days of the servers being pulled down every day for emergency maintenance.
d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »jayssenrwb17_ESO wrote: »d.crosgrove_ESO wrote: »
Especially in light of the fact that the skilled technicians at GW2 do patches on the fly.
I know. It is almost entering into the realm of being just plain embarrassing for them. Oh well. Hopefully they will start to get a grip on the technology and not need to take phenomenally long to apply patches. Can you imagine how long the servers will be down for Craglorn? lol, probably another 12 hours, and then days and days of the servers being pulled down every day for emergency maintenance.
Perhaps, in fairness, it is being unfair to compare the skill levels of the Zeni technicians to the GW2 techs. The GW2 crew had a decade to learn their craft, while, and correct me if I am wrong, this is the first Zeno MMO?
To date, their only experience with patches have been watching the automated updates done by MS Office. If so, to expect the Zeni techs to be able to perform patches and updates the way they should be done is sadly my mistake.