Of course not.I could even buy the whole undaunted line on a new 1 level char without ever setting foot into a dungeon, but nobody bats an eye at that...
I think this was talked about a lot already and I know we have "mains" for the achievements, but for the sake of convenience don't you want account-wide achievements? Also that makes dyes account wide which is also really good.
January1171 wrote: »I just want to be able to see all at once my total achievement progress across all characters.
They could keep achievements character specific, but add a toggle in the journal that lets you see what you have across characters. Maybe add how many characters you have it on, etc.
There's an add-on, if you're on PC, that gives you your total across all characters, drop down menus, etc... awesome for achievement point seekers. Kyoma's Global Achievements.
This is what it looks like. (Paired with Votan's Achievement Overview)
TheShadowScout wrote: »Personally I draw the line at -achievements-...
...since I myself don't really care about the titles, and for all I care those could be account-wide just like the cosmetics, tho I can understand that some people who like to show off their hard-earned titles may think a bit differently... and I can accept that, because when I want some title for one of my alts, I bloody well will do the thing again. Yes, I did that, twice so far, and have no qualms about doing it again if some title appears that catches my fancy. But I don't really care about the titles any more then how I use them as RP-support...
TheShadowScout wrote: »Not arbitrary.
Quite clearly defined - I do NOT want to see any sort of account wide achievements, because I like those to actually show what I did already do on this or that character, and where this or that character still hasn't gone. Quite literally in many cases (like skyshards, or exploration ahievements)
And as I said, I myself wouldn't mind at all if any effects and other stuff unlocked by those achievements would be account wide... and as mentioned, the only thing left there that is still character specific are the titles.
But once again, yes, I can also see how some people actually want those to be their last epeen bastion to show off what they actually did with this or that character, and let's be honest, most of the "showoff" titles are somewhat dependent on the build behind them in how easy they are to get, so... there is that.
TheShadowScout wrote: »Only speaking from experience here.
Because I have commented on NUMEROUS threads asking for account wide skyshards or guild progression, or riding training, or crafting motivs, whining about how time-consuming it is to do/collect all those by hand, citing the very same lame "but I the player did it so I should get it for free on every alt" attempt at rule-lawyering... and eventually, ZOS listened... and gave them something along those lines... for a price.
And I laughed, and laughed... and yeah, that is that.
And so... once again... I say, why should ZOS bother put in the effort to change their game to give account wide achievements for nothing? What's in for them?
That people have reason to play less ESO because they get more stuff acocunt wide, because they no longer have to worry about chasing this or that title or whatever on their alts?
...how does that benefit ZOS?
That people loose interest in ESO when they "completed" the achievement hunt and move on to the next new game?
...how does that benefit ZOS?
That some people might rejoice at getting this, and many, many other people (both the roleplayers who want everything character specific, and the gloryhounds who want the titles only for those who done the things) will be vexed at the change?
...how does that benefit ZOS?
The only way this can benefit ZOS is if they make it a "convenience item" in the crown store, JUST like skyshards. IF they think someone whould feel vexed enough to actually pay for mirroring achievements...
So. how about it.
What's it'd be worth you YOU? How many crowns would you spend on mirroring otherwise worthless achievements? How much would you pay to copy a title from your main?
I still think it unlikely to ever happen, since the achievements don't really do much that isn't account wide already (except titles, but... see above...), so I doubt there would be enough people willing to pay for this for ZOS to ever consider it.
Like I also said, the one thing I do consider likely would be the "Account Overview" idea. One account achievement page at the character selection screen, which shows what which character done when. And maybe comes with some rewards for multiple achievement completions, since there are some people who DID put in the extra time for that.
Could be a good place to give out stuff, perhaps things that have been rewards for older events, (like, costume pieces as outfit rewards - there are quite a few that could go for this, from dark seducer to mannimarco, golden saint or nedic armor, almalexia or other notable NPCs with unique visuals, etc.) and maybe even some crown store stuff... knowing well enough that many will not spend the time and just buy it instead.
"And the Scrolls have foretold, of black wings in the cold,That when brothers wage war come unfurled!Alduin, Bane of Kings, ancient shadow unbound,With a hunger to swallow the world!"
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »
That way if you want to RP with your lawful good character that would never touch a thieves guild quest, fine. But if you want to know how much of the game you have done as the player, well, you can know that too.
Yeah, that's my take as well. Most of the middle ground does not care, but all the gimme-crowd people want everything account-wide because they just feel entitled to it... all the RPers and EG-raiders want it character specific, either as RP support like me, or to flex their epeen-ess...I think the middle ground community (not end-game, nor RP'ers) is likely the main community that doesn't care, or want titles to be account-wide. I would say a majority of the RP'er community that have titles that perfectly fit the lore and personality of the character they created would want it to be on that character. Likewise with End-Game Raiders, when they get their Trifecta's, trust me when I say they love to flex their titles, especially in places like Craglorn and Deshaan.
Personally, I don't care what title someone waves, if someone has a idea, I say we try it, and if it works, no justification is needed. And if it doesn't work, we try someone elses idea and see if that brings the desired result.I've been in a lot of situations like that, and I'm sure other raiders that just pug for fun to help others have been there too.
That one is moot at this point, because we have the paid mirrorings.Anyways, I can see an issue where something like Skyshards are account-wide.
No need to talk to me about that. I#d agree, personally, tho I can also see that some might not, and with ZOS already having done a lot account wide... I can see why some want to defend this as their last bastion...Ultimately though, titles have no effect on gameplay, and IMO, they're cosmetics just like skins/outfits are that players can flash around, so to not have them be account-wide but make other rewards account-wide, simply makes no sense.
...and now YOU look at hat photo, and tell me... does it tell you which skyshards you missed in ALL your adventuring, or would it be easier to look at the "skyshard" page in your achievments journal?If we hypothetically say ESO removed achievements, the company would need to ask themselves if players are still able to track their progress just as effectively. In this example, we'll use Skyshards, Delves, Dolmens, etc., as they're the ones you mentioned/implied.
Agreed. Play for it, or pay for it.I agree that something like Skyshards should cost money. Hell, I agree that something like mount stats should cost money too, because even as trivial as it is, it's still something that has a direct impact on gameplay, just like Skyshards.
And neither do costumes, or mount visuals, or pets, or weapon sets, and so on.Having said that, titles and achievements have no impact on gameplay.
Agreed. So... no sense of stealing that from people by making it all account wide so they can "complete" it with less playing, right?Achievements are to give purpose and fulfillment, and a sense of accomplishment. Goals for players to achieve to increase longevity of gameplay with sometimes interesting and sometimes trivial/annoying tasks.
I would also agree on that. And like mentioned, couldn't care less if the titles became as account wide as everything else you get from your characters achievements. But also wouldn't care if they remained character-specific either, like I am sure some will want them to.Titles, skins, etc., they're frosting on the cake is all...
Yup. And that's why it would be a loosing proposition for ZOS - it would make some players happy, some players unhappy, it would cost them developer resurces to code without breaking anything else, and it would not gain them anything... yet might cost them something when people no longer need to spend time on their alts chasing that one title they realyl wanted...I wouldn't pay a cent if ZOS made it cost money, because that would be almost as bad as loot crates. Unless you sync a character and it permanently updates with that character, you'd have to constantly buy that token, or whatever it may be, over and over, to continue to update the differences in achievements. That's horrible.
I for one wouldn't believe that.I also believe that while some people say shared achievements would cause less replay value, I believe the opposite to be true.
Hmmm... personally I'd go for it on my alts too, just to see how it goes, scouting for when I go there on my main... but then, in all the years in ESO, I only got asked once, sociophobic lil me. (I accepted, did it on my alt, saved the group whenwe almost wiped and I remained standing at the second to last boss, dodging and fighting always at the edge of defeat, and somehow getting lucky enough to manage...)Though, I guess it depends on what type of player you are (RP, Casual, or Hardcore). From my experiences and the people I play with (usually a blend, but very few RP), achievements can eventually become inconvenient in some ways because most people won't help groups if it's not on their main, because if there's a chance to get credit for something that's extremely rare/difficult, they want to take that rare opportunity they may not get again to get it on their main, not a fill character they hardly jump on. However, if the credit is shared, it doesn't matter, and they're more likely to help all groups because they know it doesn't matter what character or role they play, they'll get credit for it.
Hallothiel wrote: »No.
I get the achievements on my character. That’s the one I have ‘mastered’ whatever the achievement is.
My stamblade main has done most things; myagplar healer others - but I have only done vMA on a different character, so why should either have the title? I haven’t earned it on either of them!
Hallothiel wrote: »No.
I get the achievements on my character. That’s the one I have ‘mastered’ whatever the achievement is.
My stamblade main has done most things; myagplar healer others - but I have only done vMA on a different character, so why should either have the title? I haven’t earned it on either of them!
Then don't give them to those chars. Simple as that.
All the reasons why other people think differently have been explained in this thread multiple times. And if it became possible it still wouldn't take anything away from your preferred play style.