BlissfulDelusions wrote: »This might be seen as low-effort, and I was gonna write an essay on the validity of gendered armor, but I don't have the time for it. So here's a TL;DR version of that.
I'm not gonna ask to change cloth-/leather-armor that necessitates different armor versions for men and women to cover up certain fEaTuReS, but honestly, can we get to see less of the tittyplate-trope? Some gender-neutral armor?
Preferably I'd like to see all heavy armor replaced with the gender-neutral male version with the flat chest, since any heavy armor worn has gambesons beneath, which make tittyshapes redundant, no matter how aesthetically pleasing they may or may not be. This wouldn't be a difficult task, logistically speaking, because the models for flat-chested armor already exist. You'd just have to make male versions of heavy armor appear on both male and female characters.
If gender-neutral armor is too big a request, I'd like to see male armor given codpieces and muscle cuirasses, to ensure equality in regards to sexualized armor.
Thoughts? Opinions? IMO it should be done.
BlissfulDelusions wrote: »This might be seen as low-effort, and I was gonna write an essay on the validity of gendered armor, but I don't have the time for it. So here's a TL;DR version of that.
I'm not gonna ask to change cloth-/leather-armor that necessitates different armor versions for men and women to cover up certain fEaTuReS, but honestly, can we get to see less of the tittyplate-trope? Some gender-neutral armor?
Preferably I'd like to see all heavy armor replaced with the gender-neutral male version with the flat chest, since any heavy armor worn has gambesons beneath, which make tittyshapes redundant, no matter how aesthetically pleasing they may or may not be. This wouldn't be a difficult task, logistically speaking, because the models for flat-chested armor already exist. You'd just have to make male versions of heavy armor appear on both male and female characters.
If gender-neutral armor is too big a request, I'd like to see male armor given codpieces and muscle cuirasses, to ensure equality in regards to sexualized armor.
Thoughts? Opinions? IMO it should be done.
InvictusApollo wrote: »BlissfulDelusions wrote: »This might be seen as low-effort, and I was gonna write an essay on the validity of gendered armor, but I don't have the time for it. So here's a TL;DR version of that.
I'm not gonna ask to change cloth-/leather-armor that necessitates different armor versions for men and women to cover up certain fEaTuReS, but honestly, can we get to see less of the tittyplate-trope? Some gender-neutral armor?
Preferably I'd like to see all heavy armor replaced with the gender-neutral male version with the flat chest, since any heavy armor worn has gambesons beneath, which make tittyshapes redundant, no matter how aesthetically pleasing they may or may not be. This wouldn't be a difficult task, logistically speaking, because the models for flat-chested armor already exist. You'd just have to make male versions of heavy armor appear on both male and female characters.
If gender-neutral armor is too big a request, I'd like to see male armor given codpieces and muscle cuirasses, to ensure equality in regards to sexualized armor.
Thoughts? Opinions? IMO it should be done.
There are already many "gender neutral" armor motifs. If you feel offended by "boobplates" then you can equip any of armors that already cover womanly assets.
If anything we could use more motifs that make our characters look more feminine and visually attractive.
SidraWillowsky wrote: »InvictusApollo wrote: »BlissfulDelusions wrote: »This might be seen as low-effort, and I was gonna write an essay on the validity of gendered armor, but I don't have the time for it. So here's a TL;DR version of that.
I'm not gonna ask to change cloth-/leather-armor that necessitates different armor versions for men and women to cover up certain fEaTuReS, but honestly, can we get to see less of the tittyplate-trope? Some gender-neutral armor?
Preferably I'd like to see all heavy armor replaced with the gender-neutral male version with the flat chest, since any heavy armor worn has gambesons beneath, which make tittyshapes redundant, no matter how aesthetically pleasing they may or may not be. This wouldn't be a difficult task, logistically speaking, because the models for flat-chested armor already exist. You'd just have to make male versions of heavy armor appear on both male and female characters.
If gender-neutral armor is too big a request, I'd like to see male armor given codpieces and muscle cuirasses, to ensure equality in regards to sexualized armor.
Thoughts? Opinions? IMO it should be done.
There are already many "gender neutral" armor motifs. If you feel offended by "boobplates" then you can equip any of armors that already cover womanly assets.
If anything we could use more motifs that make our characters look more feminine and visually attractive.
Nooooooo if you want boobs and battle heels look elsewhere; please don't turn ESO into.... that
logarifmik wrote: »[removed quote]
It's not about SJ at all. It's about logic behind real so-called "heavy" armor.
BlissfulDelusions wrote: »This might be seen as low-effort, and I was gonna write an essay on the validity of gendered armor, but I don't have the time for it. So here's a TL;DR version of that.
I'm not gonna ask to change cloth-/leather-armor that necessitates different armor versions for men and women to cover up certain fEaTuReS, but honestly, can we get to see less of the tittyplate-trope? Some gender-neutral armor?
Preferably I'd like to see all heavy armor replaced with the gender-neutral male version with the flat chest, since any heavy armor worn has gambesons beneath, which make tittyshapes redundant, no matter how aesthetically pleasing they may or may not be. This wouldn't be a difficult task, logistically speaking, because the models for flat-chested armor already exist. You'd just have to make male versions of heavy armor appear on both male and female characters.
If gender-neutral armor is too big a request, I'd like to see male armor given codpieces and muscle cuirasses, to ensure equality in regards to sexualized armor.
Thoughts? Opinions? IMO it should be done.
IMHO, ESO has the BEST armor options, being that you can make make or female characters realistically armored, well-protected or scantily clad, depending on your preference. By contrast, nearly every female armor option in GW2 had weird cut-outs or was downright bikini armor and heels!I don’t mind such options being available, but having that the only option for females while the male versions look totally different is downright sexist. I’m glad that ESO has so many options in armor and costumes as well as other aspects of character customization!
SidraWillowsky wrote: »IMHO, ESO has the BEST armor options, being that you can make make or female characters realistically armored, well-protected or scantily clad, depending on your preference. By contrast, nearly every female armor option in GW2 had weird cut-outs or was downright bikini armor and heels!I don’t mind such options being available, but having that the only option for females while the male versions look totally different is downright sexist. I’m glad that ESO has so many options in armor and costumes as well as other aspects of character customization!
[snip] battle heels. I don't know much about costumes so maybe they have heels as an option, but I'm SO glad that battle heels aren't a thing in ESO.
I DO appreciate the fact that this game lets me create female characters that can have small boobs and hips and no weird dainty running (Ciri in TW3 looks ridiculous when she runs, for example).
I'm here to shoot birds at you and maul you with my bear, not to break my ankles in battle heels.
Agreed, but not when it comes to functionality of European medieval armor, on which mostly fantasy armor with plate boobs is based. I think, that even if we assume, that women can be as much effective warriors in our fantasy world as some man was in Medieval times, I doubt, that those highly professional battle maidens will use armor of such a shape. Its just dangerous and ineffective, "less protective", and your life depends on it.MLGProPlayer wrote: »logarifmik wrote: »
I don't disagree with your sentiment, but sexualised armour existed in real life too.
Muscle cuirasses were popular in ancient Greece and Rome where they accentuated the idealised male form (men were the sexualised gender back then). It didn't serve any functional purpose other than to look sexy.
It all starts at character creation....if you are female you can choose to emphasize various bits of your anatomy, or not. Not sure if males can exaggerate their codpieces, as my toons are all girlies. Any armour you care to sport will then take on the gender characteristics.....to an extent.