Zorgon_The_Revenged wrote: »The way I see it...
- Crowns to Gold limits scamming and abuse
- Crowns to gold improve revenue for ZeniMax
- Improve revenue means better content.
- Without a system like this scams-for-gifts will be commonplace.
A gold to crowns system would be interesting, but a crowns to gold system is a completely different thing.....the way I see it.
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
I would totally support exchange of gold to crown store items!If I could buy mounts, pets, cosmetics (and those dungeon DLCs which I can't justify to buy until they are 500 crowns max
) with gold which I earned while playing, I would feel like I earned those mounts, pets and cosmetics by actually playing the game.
Even better, I would buy many cosmetics which I wouldn't buy with crowns (cause I like them, bit don't like them enough to spend real money).
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
The bans of irl to in-game trading is harsh usually in mmos. Eso banned one of the most popular streamers for irl to gold trading so most people will not want to risk getting banned. Zos would tap into the market that the more honest players wouldn't try doing and those players can make more money than gold with their time and so would spend lots for gold if they could buy from zos directly without the fear of being banned
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
The bans of irl to in-game trading is harsh usually in mmos. Eso banned one of the most popular streamers for irl to gold trading so most people will not want to risk getting banned. Zos would tap into the market that the more honest players wouldn't try doing and those players can make more money than gold with their time and so would spend lots for gold if they could buy from zos directly without the fear of being banned
I still don’t see why ZOS would cut into their own profits. Every item sold with in game gold to crown conversion is an item not sold with real money.
Besides, I don’t believe they really crack down on botters and gold sellers.
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
The bans of irl to in-game trading is harsh usually in mmos. Eso banned one of the most popular streamers for irl to gold trading so most people will not want to risk getting banned. Zos would tap into the market that the more honest players wouldn't try doing and those players can make more money than gold with their time and so would spend lots for gold if they could buy from zos directly without the fear of being banned
I still don’t see why ZOS would cut into their own profits. Every item sold with in game gold to crown conversion is an item not sold with real money.
Besides, I don’t believe they really crack down on botters and gold sellers.
Saucy_Jack wrote: »I think that would get shut down pretty quick though; what would be the reason for the chargeback?
Conversation 1:
"I want a chargeback for my crown purchase!"
"Did you get your crowns?"
"Yes."
"Did you spend your crowns on something from the Crown Store?"
"Yes."
"Did that item or items get credited to your account?"
"Yes, but I bought them as a gift!"
"Did you give that item or items away?"
"Yes."
"Ok, we're done here."
Conversation 2:
"I want a chargeback for my crown purchase!"
"Did you get your crowns?"
"Yes."
"Did you spend your crowns on something from the Crown Store?"
"Yes."
"Did that item or items get credited to your account?"
"Yes, but when I tried to trade someone the stuff for gold, he never sent the gold!"
"Not the intended purpose of the system, and not our problem. Ok, we're done here."
I'm not sure what other possible conversations people who attempting a chargeback would use?
It depends on the credit card company and there's something called "chargeback fraud".
For example in some cases the card holder will just argue "it wasn't delivered!" and some card companies default to the cardholder on anything digital, etc. It's not as cut and dry as it may seem.
What you're demonstrating in your mock conversations is logical and how it should work, though. However, many times it does not work that way.
JasonSilverSpring wrote: »Saucy_Jack wrote: »I think that would get shut down pretty quick though; what would be the reason for the chargeback?
Conversation 1:
"I want a chargeback for my crown purchase!"
"Did you get your crowns?"
"Yes."
"Did you spend your crowns on something from the Crown Store?"
"Yes."
"Did that item or items get credited to your account?"
"Yes, but I bought them as a gift!"
"Did you give that item or items away?"
"Yes."
"Ok, we're done here."
Conversation 2:
"I want a chargeback for my crown purchase!"
"Did you get your crowns?"
"Yes."
"Did you spend your crowns on something from the Crown Store?"
"Yes."
"Did that item or items get credited to your account?"
"Yes, but when I tried to trade someone the stuff for gold, he never sent the gold!"
"Not the intended purpose of the system, and not our problem. Ok, we're done here."
I'm not sure what other possible conversations people who attempting a chargeback would use?
It depends on the credit card company and there's something called "chargeback fraud".
For example in some cases the card holder will just argue "it wasn't delivered!" and some card companies default to the cardholder on anything digital, etc. It's not as cut and dry as it may seem.
What you're demonstrating in your mock conversations is logical and how it should work, though. However, many times it does not work that way.
ZOS has it in their TOS that accounts that have a charge back are suspended. So, that person would lose their ability to play until they sorted it out with ZOS.
MercTheMage wrote: »Oh yeah that's a great idea. I long to spend 2m gold for 200 crowns -_-
It would be easier to just sell ESO+ on the store for crowns so you would just earn the crowns and they buy it that way.
I don’t believe that. Logic would say that the demand for gold increases with the things you can actually buy with said gold. Now, of course you can go straight to the crown store too. But if the conversion to botted gold made the item price cheaper, people would be tempted to go that route.
The bans of irl to in-game trading is harsh usually in mmos. Eso banned one of the most popular streamers for irl to gold trading so most people will not want to risk getting banned. Zos would tap into the market that the more honest players wouldn't try doing and those players can make more money than gold with their time and so would spend lots for gold if they could buy from zos directly without the fear of being banned
I still don’t see why ZOS would cut into their own profits. Every item sold with in game gold to crown conversion is an item not sold with real money.
Besides, I don’t believe they really crack down on botters and gold sellers.
No, it's not.. I don't think you're understanding how this works. Every crown item would be purchased by someone still.
So X Player buys crowns. Y Player has gold to exchange for crowns. X Player exchanges his crowns for gold. Y Player gives up gold to the integrated system and X player gets gold while Y player gets the crowns.
- X player still pays for the crowns
- Y player gets those crowns.
- X player receives gold in exchange.
- This promotes more crown sales.
KingYogi415 wrote: »KingYogi415 wrote: »The only reason they do this is because the store is P2W.
It's how they justify selling gold or items that can be sold for gold.
Only trash failing games need to do this to keep their servers open.
Eso is neither trash, nor failing.
If these other games are so great, go play them!
WoW isn't failing and does it. WoW is the biggest MMO.
I'd say it is trash though.
Go play it then, and you can spew your bad ideas on their forums.I don't get it knowledge why don't you just play GW2 and not make ESO like that abomination..
Cause seriously GW2 is garbage.
Both of you guys need to cool it. You can discuss differing opinions without resorting to bad decorum.
VaranisArano wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Just sale for gold. I don’t follow why gold to crowns is a thought
Because the expectation is that people will go "Hey, WTS crown store mount for Gold, whisper offer"
And other people are like, "Dude, how can you make sure you don't get scammed? You can't!"
And then some people say "ZOS, you should make sure people don't get scammed!"
But so far ZOS is all radio silence, so as far as we know, ZOS doesn't give a fart if people get scammed, since they should have been using the system to give other people gifts not trades.
What you're failing to account for is no one is going to care about this.What you're failing to account for is that these systems have been implemented in hundreds of games and the result is always people gifting for gold with some people using it as intended.
No, then it’s not longer crown exclusive
I personally would love this. I buy WoW tokens with gold all the time and keep my sub going that way.
That being said, ZO$ is no Blizzard. They would never do anything to make less money. Even if that means player retention.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Just sale for gold. I don’t follow why gold to crowns is a thought
Because the expectation is that people will go "Hey, WTS crown store mount for Gold, whisper offer"
And other people are like, "Dude, how can you make sure you don't get scammed? You can't!"
And then some people say "ZOS, you should make sure people don't get scammed!"
But so far ZOS is all radio silence, so as far as we know, ZOS doesn't give a fart if people get scammed, since they should have been using the system to give other people gifts not trades.
VaranisArano
My comment should be understood as....there shouldn’t be any crown store items at all that can’t be obtained in playing the game.
If we are going to request something let’s request something they’ve already agreed to that they went back on their word on.
If you want to remove the possibility of being scammed remove the incentive to involve any real money. I’d gladly pay fo things to keep the game running but coming from experiences like WoW and Diablos Real money auction house....this is going to go down bad.
The issues arent gifting crown items or crowns, the issue is items in the crown store that aren’t otherwise attainable.
It’s almost more simplified to interpret the OP as a way to ask to spend real money for gold exchange.
So many people here are innocent and naive.
This 100% inevitability will result in gold for crowns trade whether your innocent mind likes it or not.
If you can get crates through someone else for gold, you will.