mrdiamond666 wrote: »Has anybody seen a bot on ps4?
those are not bots. botting and bots are a completely different thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-boxing - the article is a litte misleading though, as the author makes it sound like there is legit reason to using a program to run multiple clients (multiple boxes) and challenge to controlling multiple game characters. the basic principle behind it is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplexing - sending one command (just like every normal player does, usually via mouse and keyboard) and have all other clients (resp. game characters) execute that same command as well. there is no skill or challenge involved whatsoever.
you should also be aware that even though the list of games that allow multiboxing (having multiple clients open at the same time) might be accurate, most of these games do not allow multiplexing as they deem it an unfair advantage (ergo cheating)
Hello,
Every day I find bots in different parts of Tamriel.
The bots are ruining the game's economy.
ZOS needs to do something about this.
Recent screenshots of bots farming south of Karthdar, Grahtwood, PC Europe server(NO naming & shaming, UI is hidden):
The bots are still there
Server: PC EU
Bots count: over 40+
Please stop them and implement anti bot system @ZOS_JessicaFolsom @ZOS_GinaBruno
Talon_Draconis wrote: »Seen bots appear about a month ago on the xbone.
Trouble is that banning bot accounts do no good....it just takes too long for them to ban them by the time that zmax bans the account the bots already made their money many times over....
They have to perma ban the gold buyers in if ands or buts
But seems no mmo ever goes after the buyers for some reason
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello there,
Recently we've had to remove several comments for being off topic and for being mostly flame. Keep in mind that flaming is against the Forum Rules and should be avoided to prevent action on one's own account.
Thank you for understanding.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello there,
Recently we've had to remove several comments for being off topic and for being mostly flame. Keep in mind that flaming is against the Forum Rules and should be avoided to prevent action on one's own account.
Thank you for understanding.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello there,
Recently we've had to remove several comments for being off topic and for being mostly flame. Keep in mind that flaming is against the Forum Rules and should be avoided to prevent action on one's own account.
Thank you for understanding.
Now imagine not only the comments were removed but the bots as well....that would be shocking indeed.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello there,
Recently we've had to remove several comments for being off topic and for being mostly flame. Keep in mind that flaming is against the Forum Rules and should be avoided to prevent action on one's own account.
Thank you for understanding.
Now imagine not only the comments were removed but the bots as well....that would be shocking indeed.
The bots were removed from the spot too.
Please read my last update
*Update:
I just checked the spot: south of Karthdar, Grahtwood, all the bots are gone! (PC EU)
Well done ZOS
lordrichter wrote: »*Update:
I just checked the spot: south of Karthdar, Grahtwood, all the bots are gone! (PC EU)
Well done ZOS
We can hope. However (get ready...) this might not be the case.
They might be there, but just not be visible because they are in a different "phase/channel/instance" of the game. They might be offline for whatever reason. Maybe it is a Bank Holiday in whatever country they are in and no one is at work. If the server goes down or they get disconnected, it could be a while before they get back into the game.
The mysterious missing bot thing happens a lot to me when I pass by Fort Virak in Stonefalls. They simply aren't there one time, but they are another time. In Shadowfen, they are much more reliable. One account in Shadowfen has been there so long that I expect him to tell me to get off his lawn. If anyone was there to say anything to me, which there probably isn't.
If they re-appear, with different account names, it is possible that they got the boot from ZOS.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello there,
Recently we've had to remove several comments for being off topic and for being mostly flame. Keep in mind that flaming is against the Forum Rules and should be avoided to prevent action on one's own account.
Thank you for understanding.
Karthdar bots are still there.
They are in two instances simultaneously. It is possible that you ported in a third botfree instance.
I see several new bot accounts here. Maybe ZOS banned a few of them but surely not all.
Yes.. I am the guy that showed you the spot.
I still have a theory that allowing changes to your @ handle is part of why there is a surge in botting. It makes selling accounts far more attractive. After all, if I were some random schmoe that wanted to be instant-win, but didn't want to look like it, be better to buy the account name "fjlkdsj7890sadf7" and then rename it "superwinner777" than to be stuck with a handle that is clearly someone facerolling on their keyboard.
Sure, behind the scenes there may be some evidence, but that's not the goal here. It's the social stigma a random handle has, which clearly indicates the strong likelihood (but not guarantee) of a previously-botted and/or currently-botted account.
Thus: The farmer creates a random account, bots it to maximum CP, puts it on the market, and sells it. The buyer gets a maxed out account (and any alts they create only have to get to LV 50 to take advantage of the CP), they can name it anything they want to make it personal, and they can still do all the story content if they want. (They probably won't, because that's too much work that you can't just buy your way out of, but still.)
I'd love to see if someone is able to prove or disprove this theory with logs/statistics/evidence.
I still have a theory that allowing changes to your @ handle is part of why there is a surge in botting. It makes selling accounts far more attractive. After all, if I were some random schmoe that wanted to be instant-win, but didn't want to look like it, be better to buy the account name "fjlkdsj7890sadf7" and then rename it "superwinner777" than to be stuck with a handle that is clearly someone facerolling on their keyboard.
Sure, behind the scenes there may be some evidence, but that's not the goal here. It's the social stigma a random handle has, which clearly indicates the strong likelihood (but not guarantee) of a previously-botted and/or currently-botted account.
Thus: The farmer creates a random account, bots it to maximum CP, puts it on the market, and sells it. The buyer gets a maxed out account (and any alts they create only have to get to LV 50 to take advantage of the CP), they can name it anything they want to make it personal, and they can still do all the story content if they want. (They probably won't, because that's too much work that you can't just buy your way out of, but still.)
I'd love to see if someone is able to prove or disprove this theory with logs/statistics/evidence.
Interesting theory.
There is no evidence that User_ID changes are common practice for botters.
But I know that sometimes ZOS allow players to change their User_ID but it is being evaluated case by case and there is a restriction to the number of times the User_ID can be changed.
lordrichter wrote: »I still have a theory that allowing changes to your @ handle is part of why there is a surge in botting. It makes selling accounts far more attractive. After all, if I were some random schmoe that wanted to be instant-win, but didn't want to look like it, be better to buy the account name "fjlkdsj7890sadf7" and then rename it "superwinner777" than to be stuck with a handle that is clearly someone facerolling on their keyboard.
Sure, behind the scenes there may be some evidence, but that's not the goal here. It's the social stigma a random handle has, which clearly indicates the strong likelihood (but not guarantee) of a previously-botted and/or currently-botted account.
Thus: The farmer creates a random account, bots it to maximum CP, puts it on the market, and sells it. The buyer gets a maxed out account (and any alts they create only have to get to LV 50 to take advantage of the CP), they can name it anything they want to make it personal, and they can still do all the story content if they want. (They probably won't, because that's too much work that you can't just buy your way out of, but still.)
I'd love to see if someone is able to prove or disprove this theory with logs/statistics/evidence.
Interesting theory.
There is no evidence that User_ID changes are common practice for botters.
But I know that sometimes ZOS allow players to change their User_ID but it is being evaluated case by case and there is a restriction to the number of times the User_ID can be changed.
We would not always be able to tell if the account name had changed.
Account name changes, unlike character name changes, are free. They can be done at any time. ZOS has not said if there is a limit.
yes, maybe.
But it is logical to assume there is a limit to how many times a player can change his User_ID and if the User_ID is appropriate(approved by auto system when entered) etc.