A large rectangle
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Even bad MMOs are getting 10 year runs these days . Some even longer . There's no way to say how long a good title will last . Not in the foreseeable future would be best option .
RealHeadhonchoe wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Even bad MMOs are getting 10 year runs these days . Some even longer . There's no way to say how long a good title will last . Not in the foreseeable future would be best option .
10 years oh boy, totally forgot about games like world of Warcraft that been out like 12 years??
Silver_Strider wrote: »MMOs tend to die slow deaths. Even the worst MMOs can survive for a minimal 5 years and ESO is far from the worst, despite my personal feelings on the matter.
I'd give it another 5 years at the most though, before people get sick of the expired milk ZOS is funneling down people's throats.
BenLocoDete wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Even bad MMOs are getting 10 year runs these days . Some even longer . There's no way to say how long a good title will last . Not in the foreseeable future would be best option .
Not really wishing the game to die but I'd like at some point a rewriting of the shaders and general graphical concept. It never pleased me how cartunish the game looks, to my understanding it is very different from the other titles. If you remove every TES reference you could easily sell it for any other title.
andreasranasen wrote: »I'd give ESO 3-4 more years. 2 more years of momentum. The remaining two holding on to whatever player base that's left. A lot changes in 3-4 years... ESO will soon meet their competitors.
Burgererer wrote: »andreasranasen wrote: »I'd give ESO 3-4 more years. 2 more years of momentum. The remaining two holding on to whatever player base that's left. A lot changes in 3-4 years... ESO will soon meet their competitors.
They've already met their competitors. WoW, FF Online, Guilds Wars 2, etc. They all stand against the competition, and with good numbers. I'd also like to note that some other MMOs have been going for years, and still are good for new and old players alike.
In all honesty, until their publisher sees them as useless or somehow runs out of cash (people will never quit buying Fallout Shelter Lunchboxes), I see them sticking around for a long time.
andreasranasen wrote: »Burgererer wrote: »andreasranasen wrote: »I'd give ESO 3-4 more years. 2 more years of momentum. The remaining two holding on to whatever player base that's left. A lot changes in 3-4 years... ESO will soon meet their competitors.
They've already met their competitors. WoW, FF Online, Guilds Wars 2, etc. They all stand against the competition, and with good numbers. I'd also like to note that some other MMOs have been going for years, and still are good for new and old players alike.
In all honesty, until their publisher sees them as useless or somehow runs out of cash (people will never quit buying Fallout Shelter Lunchboxes), I see them sticking around for a long time.
They haven't met any competitors on console yet. ESO is winning on console for MMO's.
As Guild Wars veteran, I am truly disappointed they didn't make a console version for GW2. I probably would have never started this game. Arenanet truly care about their players
Silver_Strider wrote: »MMOs tend to die slow deaths. Even the worst MMOs can survive for a minimal 5 years and ESO is far from the worst, despite my personal feelings on the matter.
I'd give it another 5 years at the most though, before people get sick of the expired milk ZOS is funneling down people's throats.
People said the same about SWTOR and bioware turned that around extremely fast.
Regardless of everyones point of view on a game like SWTOR and its "problematic" history. There is no question right now that its still super popular and bringing in quite a bit of revenue.