Narvuntien wrote: »The poll isn't nauanced enough.
It depends on the type of guild.
If the guild is a group of like minded individuals particularly if it is a group of real life friends or people from similar backgrounds. That is an exclusive guild it has a purpose for those friends to hang out together. You can speak "freely" because everyone basically agrees, for good or ill.
But if you guild wants to be inclusive, that is attract as many different players as it can then it needs to be respectful of people of different backgrounds feelings or it risks losing members. In a simlar way most large companies are in favor of inclusivity. If I needs donations for its store, if It needs good traders, if it needs active players for dungeons and trails it cannot be pushing people away.
I'd much perfer people go to guild chats to be terrible people than zone chat. Since this game needs players so it needs to be as inclusive as possible and terrible zone chat people can push away players.
I think the most important thing is how you handle being called out for percieved terrible behavour is the most important thing. I mean sometimes you can be mistakenly inappropraite or misjudge a crowd, it is going to happen. The "Am I being inappropraite?, No! it is minorities that are wrong" type response is the wrong way to go about it. It is your chance to learn something about other people rather than being angry someone made you feel bad about your behaviour.
I think both sides of this arguement is actually the same thing, just from two different perspectives. One person wants a safe space to be what the other sees are inappropraite and the other wants a safe space from people that are innappropraite. When one side gets angry because they have been made to feel bad the other side gets angry that the other side made them feel bad. The only difference is your perspective.
Sorry, I didn't want to have too many gray areas. Polls with an abundance of options tend to lose value in my opinion.
Narvuntien wrote: »The poll isn't nauanced enough.
It depends on the type of guild.
If the guild is a group of like minded individuals particularly if it is a group of real life friends or people from similar backgrounds. That is an exclusive guild it has a purpose for those friends to hang out together. You can speak "freely" because everyone basically agrees, for good or ill.
But if you guild wants to be inclusive, that is attract as many different players as it can then it needs to be respectful of people of different backgrounds feelings or it risks losing members. In a simlar way most large companies are in favor of inclusivity. If I needs donations for its store, if It needs good traders, if it needs active players for dungeons and trails it cannot be pushing people away.
I'd much perfer people go to guild chats to be terrible people than zone chat. Since this game needs players so it needs to be as inclusive as possible and terrible zone chat people can push away players.
I think the most important thing is how you handle being called out for percieved terrible behavour is the most important thing. I mean sometimes you can be mistakenly inappropraite or misjudge a crowd, it is going to happen. The "Am I being inappropraite?, No! it is minorities that are wrong" type response is the wrong way to go about it. It is your chance to learn something about other people rather than being angry someone made you feel bad about your behaviour.
I think both sides of this arguement is actually the same thing, just from two different perspectives. One person wants a safe space to be what the other sees are inappropraite and the other wants a safe space from people that are innappropraite. When one side gets angry because they have been made to feel bad the other side gets angry that the other side made them feel bad. The only difference is your perspective.
Sorry, I didn't want to have too many gray areas. Polls with an abundance of options tend to lose value in my opinion.
You're asking a gray area question with a yes/no option. That's why it's weird.
There are guilds that specifically say they safe spaces for certain types. That guild was not one of them. There are no rule that you can't talk or joke or be silly about pretty much anything, besides it wasn't directed against anyone in particular.
But as I told you, you should understand, in large guilds all 500 members can't agree on everything. It is normal that someone might not like something. They asked you guys to stop, but it wasn't the Guild that censored you. Already had similar complaints and told them - it's not a safe space. Sure, if there was some personal conflict or like a serious argument, that could be stopped, but in that case - it wasn't anything serious.
Again, these conversations can be happening when no one from the leadership is online or when no one from the people who get offended is online, in the first case - no one can stop you, in the second case - no one will complain. But you should understand that among 500 members there might be someone who can ask you to stop. In this case it wasn't even disrespectful if I remember correctly. And either way - you were not restrained by a guild
Specifics aside, in general I'm for the option 1 (or 3). There are different people, not everyone will agree - it's normal. But the freedom of speech doesn't end where someone's feelings begin. There can always be situations where 1 person doesn't feel comfortable, that doesn't mean others are restrained. They could be nice to that one person and not continue the topic (while that person is online XD). Either way, unless it's an official guild rule that you can't talk about X and that rule is being enforced - I don't think you should leave a big guild if someone disagrees with you. It's a part of being in a guild with other people.
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »I'll share with you a secret . If you talk about things in a positive way , you get happy conversations . If you give respect you make respectful and very helpful friends . If you are kind , you are more often treated with kindness . Why would anyone want to be negative and attract negativity is so beyond me . It's like people that enjoy paying for spankings from professional spankers . You could keep your money and buy something nice without the sore bottom . Freedom to say what ever you want should only come if there is freedom for everyone to react they way they want to your free speech . Everyome is for freedom except when it comes to freedom to get your butt kicked without calling a police officer . When everyone removes assault from the law books then I'll be pro freedom of speech .
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »I'll share with you a secret . If you talk about things in a positive way , you get happy conversations . If you give respect you make respectful and very helpful friends . If you are kind , you are more often treated with kindness . Why would anyone want to be negative and attract negativity is so beyond me . It's like people that enjoy paying for spankings from professional spankers . You could keep your money and buy something nice without the sore bottom . Freedom to say what ever you want should only come if there is freedom for everyone to react they way they want to your free speech . Everyome is for freedom except when it comes to freedom to get your butt kicked without calling a police officer . When everyone removes assault from the law books then I'll be pro freedom of speech .
There are guilds that specifically say they safe spaces for certain types. That guild was not one of them. There are no rule that you can't talk or joke or be silly about pretty much anything, besides it wasn't directed against anyone in particular.
But as I told you, you should understand, in large guilds all 500 members can't agree on everything. It is normal that someone might not like something. They asked you guys to stop, but it wasn't the Guild that censored you. Already had similar complaints and told them - it's not a safe space. Sure, if there was some personal conflict or like a serious argument, that could be stopped, but in that case - it wasn't anything serious.
Again, these conversations can be happening when no one from the leadership is online or when no one from the people who get offended is online, in the first case - no one can stop you, in the second case - no one will complain. But you should understand that among 500 members there might be someone who can ask you to stop. In this case it wasn't even disrespectful if I remember correctly. And either way - you were not restrained by a guild
Specifics aside, in general I'm for the option 1 (or 3). There are different people, not everyone will agree - it's normal. But the freedom of speech doesn't end where someone's feelings begin. There can always be situations where 1 person doesn't feel comfortable, that doesn't mean others are restrained. They could be nice to that one person and not continue the topic (while that person is online XD). Either way, unless it's an official guild rule that you can't talk about X and that rule is being enforced - I don't think you should leave a big guild if someone disagrees with you. It's a part of being in a guild with other people.
Edit:
This topic isn't about me.
Since you brought it up though--I left because I didn't think your guild was the right home, not because anyone asked me to leave. Someone was offended by the lighthearted conversation we were having so we promptly stopped out of respect. There's nothing more to it. I thought about it and left a while afterwards after deciding the guild wasn't a good fit for me. I did it quietly and did not rage, and I left on good terms with the offended party.
If you have anything more to say on the subject please keep it private and send me more ingame mail or a PM. Let's keep this a generalized poll, not a blog.
KochDerDamonen wrote: »This conversation is very gray-area, but I think the idea that some people react to speech violently falls firmly on one side for most people. We don't base our social standards on how people in the congo behave, and that should go for any 'hood' where violence is an expected response to speech.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »KochDerDamonen wrote: »This conversation is very gray-area, but I think the idea that some people react to speech violently falls firmly on one side for most people. We don't base our social standards on how people in the congo behave, and that should go for any 'hood' where violence is an expected response to speech.
Well, Congolese people reading this will be very pleased to see them described as the very example of unsocial, incorrect, brutal, violent, prehistorical cultural behaviours....
See, it's not directed at me, but I still call it offensive... (unless I've misunderstood you).