... and a system was created to further take advantage of that fact. You want this so keep spending until you get what you want. On average it will be considerably much more then a direct price.brandonv516 wrote: »ChaosWotan wrote: »A hundred bucks on crown crates is not that much compared to how much other hobbies often cost.
Most hobbies give you a hundred bucks worth of something in return for your hundred bucks, even if it's something ephemeral like "fun". This game gives you nothing. I make enough of a good living that I could buy crown crates till the cows come home and not worry about it at all, but I would never do something so ridiculous as to buy even one. It's almost exactly the same thing as flushing a hundred bucks down the toilet.
Again this comes down to your own definition of "worth". It is worth it to some to have fancy mounts to run around with.
I'm probably going to get banned for this but I just got a warning for using the words "hypocrisy", "pompous", "small-minded" and "high-horse". No cusswords. No cheap derogatory name-calling. Just those words to illustrate poor argumentation on the part of some people in this thread. My posts were also deleted. When did it become "not acceptable" to imply someone is being a hypocrite? GG.
Watch out folks. The pitchforks and torches are out in force today. ZOS Community Reps are happy when people are bickering and insulting others like 5 year-olds. When somebody pokes holes into people's arguments and points out the act of hypocrisy like an adult formally debating, warnings abound.
MasterSpatula wrote: »0 packs purchased, 0 mounts. 100% success rate. BOOM!
PlaceboSoul wrote: »I'm probably going to get banned for this but I just got a warning for using the words "hypocrisy", "pompous", "small-minded" and "high-horse". No cusswords. No cheap derogatory name-calling. Just those words to illustrate poor argumentation on the part of some people in this thread. My posts were also deleted. When did it become "not acceptable" to imply someone is being a hypocrite? GG.
Watch out folks. The pitchforks and torches are out in force today. ZOS Community Reps are happy when people are bickering and insulting others like 5 year-olds. When somebody pokes holes into people's arguments and points out the act of hypocrisy like an adult formally debating, warnings abound.
Is that really how you viewed your posts? Not picking a fight here, but I just want to point out to you, you were not exactly walking the high road righteously. You slang plenty of mud in your posts. I openly admit others, as well as myself did too, but you were certainly not the moral mature voice you think you were.
Just pointing this out, not because I'm proud of everything I've posted, I'm not, but it would seem you are.
PlaceboSoul wrote: »I'm probably going to get banned for this but I just got a warning for using the words "hypocrisy", "pompous", "small-minded" and "high-horse". No cusswords. No cheap derogatory name-calling. Just those words to illustrate poor argumentation on the part of some people in this thread. My posts were also deleted. When did it become "not acceptable" to imply someone is being a hypocrite? GG.
Watch out folks. The pitchforks and torches are out in force today. ZOS Community Reps are happy when people are bickering and insulting others like 5 year-olds. When somebody pokes holes into people's arguments and points out the act of hypocrisy like an adult formally debating, warnings abound.
Is that really how you viewed your posts? Not picking a fight here, but I just want to point out to you, you were not exactly walking the high road righteously. You slang plenty of mud in your posts. I openly admit others, as well as myself did too, but you were certainly not the moral mature voice you think you were.
Just pointing this out, not because I'm proud of everything I've posted, I'm not, but it would seem you are.
I didn't mention the word "morality" in any of my posts. Being rational and debating flawed arguments is a far cry from morality. You're asking me to rebute an attack against a stance I never once took. Nice try.
PlaceboSoul wrote: »We read your posts before they were gone, all of us aren't as blind and stupid as you seem to think we are.
Maybe ZoS could doing a bothway system (Store & Ingame) or a system where u can transferring Gold into Crowns. There would be still people who pay for it, because they want them fast. Only a idea...
@PlaceboSoul
I understand your arguments but in a way it looks that u also do not know how the world turns. Zenimax is a Incorporated Company , so it's natural that their goal is profit (in best case high profit). When ESO doesn't make enough profit it will be abandoned. There is no way to run nowdays the game with only selling DLC's or Addons like in GW 1.
I think too that there should be also cosmetic stuff available ingame. I hope there will be a fair balance between Cosmetic stuff available Ingame/Store in future.
I bought some crates today.....don't judge!!!.....and I was happy about pretty much everything. I got a couple of mounts, pets and lots of potions so I'm not unhappy. However, I think with just about every crate I opened, I got the banekin pet. Seriously! I started out with 1 crown gem. I got doubles on one or two things, but I got banekin after banekin after banekin. After exchanging some potions I didn't really want, I can now buy my own apex reward.
ChaosWotan wrote: »Used about $100 on the new crown crates, and basically got nothing. Only two non-apex mounts. Last time I got 3 apex mounts from the same numbers of crates, and several non-apex mounts. I know this is a gamble, and don't mind supporting ESO in any case, but a bit curious if the RNG is worse this time.
BlueViolet wrote: »Absolutely no sympathy for anyone who spends a cent on those crates and doesn't get anything decent.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »Maybe it's just me, but I think there's a lot less wild hunt mounts around than there were storm mounts last time around on day 1. I think it's probably more to do with less people buying them than RNG being tweaked. They were a novelty last time around. I bought some, yet this time, I just bought what i needed with gems and have zero inclination to go back to them.
Honestly, if they aren't legally compelled to disclose the rates or even keep them the same, I'd do all kind of shady stuff.I wouldn't be surprised if the RNG is worse so people spend more money.
ZOS should be required by law to publicly release the RNG % chance for each item.