
staracino_ESO wrote: »Next up: WAMASU! You heard it here first.
cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
I completely agree with @cyclonus11 here... As long as ZOS actually BOTHERS to create the lore. The Dro-M'Athra mount has lore! We know what it is, we know why it is... even though there's a very minor inconsistency with it's existence, it's still lore
This is very unlike the other mystical mounts we have. Lore behind the ice horse? Is there any?
staracino_ESO wrote: »Next up: WAMASU! You heard it here first.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
I completely agree with @cyclonus11 here... As long as ZOS actually BOTHERS to create the lore. The Dro-M'Athra mount has lore! We know what it is, we know why it is... even though there's a very minor inconsistency with it's existence, it's still lore
This is very unlike the other mystical mounts we have. Lore behind the ice horse? Is there any?
You mean like the lore behind the nightmare courser and the ice mount? Because if you call that one sentence description lore. I might have to question if youre being serious or not.
The gore creates the game, not the other way around.cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »The "Lore" Creates the Game, not the other way around.cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
There I fixed your spelling error, without the lore this game would just another generic fantasy game.
Isn't it the devs get to choose and state what's lore, not the players?
So ultimately, they decide what's lore breaking.
Lore changes with every iteration of a series.
Been playing ES games since Arena and this doesn't bother me in the least. And I love ES lore.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
I completely agree with @cyclonus11 here... As long as ZOS actually BOTHERS to create the lore. The Dro-M'Athra mount has lore! We know what it is, we know why it is... even though there's a very minor inconsistency with it's existence, it's still lore
This is very unlike the other mystical mounts we have. Lore behind the ice horse? Is there any?
You mean like the lore behind the nightmare courser and the ice mount? Because if you call that one sentence description lore. I might have to question if youre being serious or not.
TheWhiteDarkness wrote: »I want an Echatere mount! Already in-game so not hard to make as mounts!
Isn't it the devs get to choose and state what's lore, not the players?
So ultimately, they decide what's lore breaking.
Lore changes with every iteration of a series.
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »Isn't it the devs get to choose and state what's lore, not the players?
So ultimately, they decide what's lore breaking.
Lore changes with every iteration of a series.
This is absolutely true. They might one day decide huge pauldrons with lightning and miniature tornadoes coming out of them are the lore.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »cyclonus11 wrote: »The game creates the lore, not the other way around.
I completely agree with @cyclonus11 here... As long as ZOS actually BOTHERS to create the lore. The Dro-M'Athra mount has lore! We know what it is, we know why it is... even though there's a very minor inconsistency with it's existence, it's still lore
This is very unlike the other mystical mounts we have. Lore behind the ice horse? Is there any?
You mean like the lore behind the nightmare courser and the ice mount? Because if you call that one sentence description lore. I might have to question if youre being serious or not.
I'm saying there is no lore behind the ice horse. I don't count item descriptions as lore @Korah_Eaglecry
The Dro-M'Artha exist in the game... they are sort of being added as "living lore" and there are other things that have discussed the Dro-M'Artha, even prior to ESO.
Where is a race of ice horses in the lore?
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »Isn't it the devs get to choose and state what's lore, not the players?
So ultimately, they decide what's lore breaking.
Lore changes with every iteration of a series.
This is absolutely true. They might one day decide huge pauldrons with lightning and miniature tornadoes coming out of them are the lore.
If they do then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it's their property, dude!
Nirnrotten wrote: »With all the hype and hate focused on "lorebreaking" mounts and their exuberant prices what sort of lore friendly mounts would you like to see in the future?
I vote for the Unicorn found in Oblivion. That mount killed many a monster for me. It's too bad it could never be stabled.I went to such great lengths to keep em...