I understand your argument but it's built on false premises.I understand why you would want the that but IMI it would pretty much lead to less competition and more price fixing because everyone can see all the prices everywhere. The competition is better as it is precisely because we can't see all the prices for everything all at once.
The first false premise is that the current system prevents some players to control the market. This is clearly not the case. There have been multiple threads about this, notably on consoles where they do not have access to third-party addons like on PC. In a way, the addons saved (somehow) the PC economy from these anticompetitive practices.
The second false premise is that a global AH or a meta-search engine would lead to more anticompetitive practices. This is a half-truth, because it depends how it's implemented. In the real world, there is something called "antitrust laws" to prevent these anticompetitive practices. These could be replicated in the game code to protect the economy and the "consumers".
Nothing false in anything I've said. It is based on my direct experience with a global AH in other games. No developer is going to put anti trust coding in their AH system/economy.
A global AH won't fix the issues on consoles.
Your experience, not the majority experience.
I understand your argument but it's built on false premises.I understand why you would want the that but IMI it would pretty much lead to less competition and more price fixing because everyone can see all the prices everywhere. The competition is better as it is precisely because we can't see all the prices for everything all at once.
The first false premise is that the current system prevents some players to control the market. This is clearly not the case. There have been multiple threads about this, notably on consoles where they do not have access to third-party addons like on PC. In a way, the addons saved (somehow) the PC economy from these anticompetitive practices.
The second false premise is that a global AH or a meta-search engine would lead to more anticompetitive practices. This is a half-truth, because it depends how it's implemented. In the real world, there is something called "antitrust laws" to prevent these anticompetitive practices. These could be replicated in the game code to protect the economy and the "consumers".
Nothing false in anything I've said. It is based on my direct experience with a global AH in other games. No developer is going to put anti trust coding in their AH system/economy.
A global AH won't fix the issues on consoles.
Your experience, not the majority experience.
I love spending 2hrs just to NOT find a set piece I'm looking for on console.
I understand your argument but it's built on false premises.I understand why you would want the that but IMI it would pretty much lead to less competition and more price fixing because everyone can see all the prices everywhere. The competition is better as it is precisely because we can't see all the prices for everything all at once.
The first false premise is that the current system prevents some players to control the market. This is clearly not the case. There have been multiple threads about this, notably on consoles where they do not have access to third-party addons like on PC. In a way, the addons saved (somehow) the PC economy from these anticompetitive practices.
The second false premise is that a global AH or a meta-search engine would lead to more anticompetitive practices. This is a half-truth, because it depends how it's implemented. In the real world, there is something called "antitrust laws" to prevent these anticompetitive practices. These could be replicated in the game code to protect the economy and the "consumers".
Nothing false in anything I've said. It is based on my direct experience with a global AH in other games. No developer is going to put anti trust coding in their AH system/economy.
A global AH won't fix the issues on consoles.
Your experience, not the majority experience.
Honestly no one's experience matters one iota.
The developers made the game. We did not.
They are not obligated to copy the systems on every other MMO just because it's in every other MMO.
They wanted a different system for this game. They didn't want Walmart simulator but went for the small town trader feel. From the other poll 2 out of 3 agree and like the system as it is with perhaps some changes to the UI to allow better searching of stuff on the trader ala Awesome Guild Store.
In any case the argument is old, tons of threads have been posted since the beginning of the game. They have said it will not happen. But keep on beating that dead horse if it makes you feel better. At least it will be nice and tender for the scavengers if there is anything left but bones at this point.
Callous2208 wrote: »I understand your argument but it's built on false premises.I understand why you would want the that but IMI it would pretty much lead to less competition and more price fixing because everyone can see all the prices everywhere. The competition is better as it is precisely because we can't see all the prices for everything all at once.
The first false premise is that the current system prevents some players to control the market. This is clearly not the case. There have been multiple threads about this, notably on consoles where they do not have access to third-party addons like on PC. In a way, the addons saved (somehow) the PC economy from these anticompetitive practices.
The second false premise is that a global AH or a meta-search engine would lead to more anticompetitive practices. This is a half-truth, because it depends how it's implemented. In the real world, there is something called "antitrust laws" to prevent these anticompetitive practices. These could be replicated in the game code to protect the economy and the "consumers".
Nothing false in anything I've said. It is based on my direct experience with a global AH in other games. No developer is going to put anti trust coding in their AH system/economy.
A global AH won't fix the issues on consoles.
Your experience, not the majority experience.
I believe it is the majority experience. There are a few polls floating around that back that up.
failkiwib16_ESO wrote: »Btw. for your information, the current guildtrader system allows guildchains that have monopoly over entire maps, guildmasters that fiddle with Master Merchant addon prices.
New players have limited access to guildstores.
Players with limited DLC access or no DLC access have limited access to guildstores.
Right, but they are the only source of data that people can look at as opposed to someone claiming "9/10 people think X". We don't exactly have a lot of choice in terms of what to look at for 'evidence'.I understand your argument but it's built on false premises.I understand why you would want the that but IMI it would pretty much lead to less competition and more price fixing because everyone can see all the prices everywhere. The competition is better as it is precisely because we can't see all the prices for everything all at once.
The first false premise is that the current system prevents some players to control the market. This is clearly not the case. There have been multiple threads about this, notably on consoles where they do not have access to third-party addons like on PC. In a way, the addons saved (somehow) the PC economy from these anticompetitive practices.
The second false premise is that a global AH or a meta-search engine would lead to more anticompetitive practices. This is a half-truth, because it depends how it's implemented. In the real world, there is something called "antitrust laws" to prevent these anticompetitive practices. These could be replicated in the game code to protect the economy and the "consumers".
Nothing false in anything I've said. It is based on my direct experience with a global AH in other games. No developer is going to put anti trust coding in their AH system/economy.
A global AH won't fix the issues on consoles.
Your experience, not the majority experience.
Honestly no one's experience matters one iota.
The developers made the game. We did not.
They are not obligated to copy the systems on every other MMO just because it's in every other MMO.
They wanted a different system for this game. They didn't want Walmart simulator but went for the small town trader feel. From the other poll 2 out of 3 agree and like the system as it is with perhaps some changes to the UI to allow better searching of stuff on the trader ala Awesome Guild Store.
In any case the argument is old, tons of threads have been posted since the beginning of the game. They have said it will not happen. But keep on beating that dead horse if it makes you feel better. At least it will be nice and tender for the scavengers if there is anything left but bones at this point.
Again the polls you speak of are a minority of the players that actually play. Most people do NOT participate on the forums and 9/10 of ppl I run into, wish for a better systems in place.
Does ESO need an auction house?
*clip*clop*clip*clop*clip*clop*
NEIGGHHHHH... it needs an Auction HORSE!
Link to the original post with details!: http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/159594/eso-needs-an-auction-horse-expanded-concept
SkoomaAddict420 wrote: »Does ESO need an auction house?
*clip*clop*clip*clop*clip*clop*
NEIGGHHHHH... it needs an Auction HORSE!
Link to the original post with details!: http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/159594/eso-needs-an-auction-horse-expanded-concept
Good idea. Like the traveling merchant we can buy. But it's not just about finding a item. It is also about not being in the right guild to even sell your stuff except to a vendor. Now if all that are guilded up no matter if they hold the guild trader spots or not could be on this list the donkey provides, that would be cool. By making it to where any in a guild could trade would be fine with me. But they have to be in a guild to trade...
QuebraRegra wrote: »not having an auction house is stupid.
Anyone played an MMO before?
Also fixes issues with the economy as well...
GarnetFire17 wrote: »there is an Auction House. That is the name of one of my guilds. I am an officer. We are selling in Stormhold this week. come see us.
Callous2208 wrote: »If the PC users don't want it fine. Give it to consoles. PCs have add ons that help with the terrible system.
I would be okay with this, as long as the consolers promise not to cry when their economy is in shambles, all their bids are sniped while they are at work, and AHProGuy22 owns all high end mats and prices them at 100k a pop.
Averya_Teira wrote: »No I like the current system as it is.
I visit the major trading hubs (5 of them) when I am looking for something. If I can't find it in that assortment, it probably isn't available. This takes me about 30 minutes to do on average
You realize how stupid ''This takes me about 30 minutes to do on average'' sounds ? THIRTY MINUTES TO MAYBE, MAYBE NOT FIND AN ITEM ?! And you find this okay ?
With an auction house, it would take you 15 seconds and the item would be cheaper ? Where exactly is the downside except less profit for the sellers (when in fact it's going to be more stable profit as stuff will sell faster and more reliably)
No guarantee you would find it on a global AH either.
I logged in yesterday to 45 mails of things I put up for sale the day before on two different stores in two different zones.
Over 27K gold in less than 24 hours. Sometime it sells in literally minutes after I post it. Seems like people have no problem finding my stuff. Maybe you need a better trading guild
kawazu874b16_ESO wrote: »very shortly, AH is "one-market", one-market is inflation, inflation lowers money value, lower money value calls pay to win model and gold sellers.
Guild traders aren't very far from TP. If you can't take time to just go through the world for that thing you want sooo much, you're too lazy to have it. (satanic laugh like in M. Jackson's Thriller)