newtinmpls wrote: »Seriously? People don't see the difference betwen sharing a bank and sharing actual skills?
This is the laziest change I've ever seen suggested. I'm going to guess it comes from the "I want to grind my character to veteran level in 15 min" crowd.
Maybe they will put it in pay for play
newtinmpls wrote: »Seriously? People don't see the difference betwen sharing a bank and sharing actual skills?
This is the laziest change I've ever seen suggested. I'm going to guess it comes from the "I want to grind my character to veteran level in 15 min" crowd.
Maybe they will put it in pay for play
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »newtinmpls wrote: »Seriously? People don't see the difference betwen sharing a bank and sharing actual skills?
This is the laziest change I've ever seen suggested. I'm going to guess it comes from the "I want to grind my character to veteran level in 15 min" crowd.
Maybe they will put it in pay for play
Following your point of view...are you in opposition to the mount changes?
Psychobunni wrote: »I would prefer an account wide crafting system, and being that they seem to want to limit players ability to obtain premium crafting items through the hirelings that you have to put the time/effort into unlocking to even get to
Psychobunni wrote: »My own reasoning for this preference is because in choosing crafting or skills, I spread my crafting out across multiple toons and when making a full set of weapons/gear/enchants...it takes about an hour of logging mutliples, getting to crafting stations and back to bank, etc, etc.........and having it account based wouldn't actually effect game play, like say shared skillpoints would. (I've seen that asked for here)
newtinmpls wrote: »
An hour? You might re-examine your organizational skills.
lordrichter wrote: »Please do not do this, ZOS.
Those of us who like Alternate characters that follow independent paths and goals do not need fewer things that make the characters unique.
Sorry, I don't support laziness. If you want more than one crafter, just start some researchs on an alt. It's already way too easy ...SoulScream wrote: »I am not going to research everything all over again on an alt I don't play all that often. I support account wide research because it causes me to just have to switch back and forth to make something.
lordrichter wrote: »Please do not do this, ZOS.
Those of us who like Alternate characters that follow independent paths and goals do not need fewer things that make the characters unique.
I'm in total agreement with this comment. I hate the whole account-wide sharing system other than for a part of the bank slots which I'd like to be shared, but with some individual character bank slots too.
I'm on PTS and its fine. I also don't think you understand the changes based on your comment. This thread is based on the 1.6 PTS experiences I've had thus far.SuraklinPrime wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »newtinmpls wrote: »Seriously? People don't see the difference betwen sharing a bank and sharing actual skills?
This is the laziest change I've ever seen suggested. I'm going to guess it comes from the "I want to grind my character to veteran level in 15 min" crowd.
Maybe they will put it in pay for play
Following your point of view...are you in opposition to the mount changes?
I think you will be a sad player when you get what the mount changes actually are.
You will have access to all mounts across account BUT each character will have to learn their own horse skills to increase speed, carry & stamina.
I suspect you will then launch a new thread about how horse skills should be account wide.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »For some reason my posts is drawing ppl to attach crafting to this suggestion.
I'm in no way suggesting that crafting be changed at all.
My suggestion is that when research is performed that the account get credit. Now this should not affect anyone who crafts x on this toon and y on another toon.
It's not dumbing down the game or making crafting easier.