Hmm, not a biased POLL then with 4 yes and only 1 no answer options....lol
Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.
He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »Full monty please, if only to ***-off the lolbreachofprivacy lobby.
Build is irrelevant, it's clear the moment you see them start to fight what build they're using.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »Full monty please, if only to ***-off the lolbreachofprivacy lobby.
Build is irrelevant, it's clear the moment you see them start to fight what build they're using.
I haven't seen many people who are against it because it 'breaches their privacy'. The most common reason for people to say no is because it encourages elitism, and will cause people to turn down people because of their gear (even in cases where the gear is perfectly fine).
It's got nothing to do with privacy, but everything to do with the kind of attitude this sort of feature encourages.
Edit: For some reason it decided to quote the same message twice.
Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.
He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »Full monty please, if only to ***-off the lolbreachofprivacy lobby.
Build is irrelevant, it's clear the moment you see them start to fight what build they're using.
I haven't seen many people who are against it because it 'breaches their privacy'. The most common reason for people to say no is because it encourages elitism, and will cause people to turn down people because of their gear (even in cases where the gear is perfectly fine).
It's got nothing to do with privacy, but everything to do with the kind of attitude this sort of feature encourages.
Edit: For some reason it decided to quote the same message twice.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »Full monty please, if only to ***-off the lolbreachofprivacy lobby.
Build is irrelevant, it's clear the moment you see them start to fight what build they're using.
I haven't seen many people who are against it because it 'breaches their privacy'. The most common reason for people to say no is because it encourages elitism, and will cause people to turn down people because of their gear (even in cases where the gear is perfectly fine).
It's got nothing to do with privacy, but everything to do with the kind of attitude this sort of feature encourages.
Edit: For some reason it decided to quote the same message twice.
How exactly does it have nothing to do with privacy? That's a very valid concern. It violates my privacy if people can look at exactly what i'm wearing, exactly my build etc. So yes. It does apply. It's a violation of privacy that LEADS to elitism. It's all related.
Providing a way to "turn it off" is also not an appropriate solution. It will lead to exactly the same elitism. People will camp out in town recruiting for trials etc. and they will refuse to let you join unless you turn your inspect on so they can judge your gear. It will happen, it's guaranteed.
fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »Full monty please, if only to ***-off the lolbreachofprivacy lobby.
Build is irrelevant, it's clear the moment you see them start to fight what build they're using.
I haven't seen many people who are against it because it 'breaches their privacy'. The most common reason for people to say no is because it encourages elitism, and will cause people to turn down people because of their gear (even in cases where the gear is perfectly fine).
It's got nothing to do with privacy, but everything to do with the kind of attitude this sort of feature encourages.
Edit: For some reason it decided to quote the same message twice.
How exactly does it have nothing to do with privacy? That's a very valid concern. It violates my privacy if people can look at exactly what i'm wearing, exactly my build etc. So yes. It does apply. It's a violation of privacy that LEADS to elitism. It's all related.
Providing a way to "turn it off" is also not an appropriate solution. It will lead to exactly the same elitism. People will camp out in town recruiting for trials etc. and they will refuse to let you join unless you turn your inspect on so they can judge your gear. It will happen, it's guaranteed.
Maybe that sentence was a bit unfortunate, but surely you understand what I'm getting at and that I'm on your side with this. I also never said that it wasn't a valid concern. If it came across that way, I didn't meant for it to.
Turning it off will do nothing, I agree. It just shouldn't be implemented to begin with, there are no positive sides to it. You would be able to get all of this information simply by asking, and if people don't want to tell you, that's their right.
None of the above.
I want the players to be inspectable through ZOS website, no info about skills or achievements (aka what is done in most MMOs).
And for people that fear Elitism, I've said it before, I'll say it again: "Elites" will realize you are a noob, no matter what your gear is and you will never learn anything in Elite groups where you're expected to perform and they *will* kick you from the group without any heart feelings as soon as the instance is failed.
Sadly, you could have inspected their gear to try to at least have a good build but you decided to stay ignorant, hoping to "crash" a so called "Elite" group. GG.