64,680,700 Alliance Points Required to get to PvP Rank 50!!!!!!

tinythinker

Jaywics wrote: »

Spawn wrote: »

So i since i haven't seen it posted any where else i figure no one has really bothered to work out the formula so i figured i'd do it my self to take a look.

So the table below shows the rank points you need per level and then the total you gained at that level.


PvP Rank |Rank Points Till Next Level |Total Rank Points Gained
0 | 700 | 700
1 | 1600 | 2300
2 | 6400 | 8700
3 | 14400 | 23100
4 | 25600 | 48700
5 | 40000 | 88700
6 | 57600 | 146300
7 | 78400 | 224700
8 | 102400 | 327100
9 | 129600 | 456700
10 | 160000 | 616700
11 | 193600 | 810300
12 | 230400 | 1040700
13 | 270400 | 1311100
14 | 313600 | 1624700
15 | 360000 | 1984700
16 | 409600 | 2394300
17 | 462400 | 2856700
18 | 518400 | 3375100
19 | 577600 | 3952700
20 | 640000 | 4592700
21 | 705600 | 5298300
22 | 774400 | 6072700
23 | 846400 | 6919100
24 | 921600 | 7840700
25 | 1000000 | 8840700
26 | 1081600 | 9922300
27 | 1166400 | 11088700
28 | 1254400 | 12343100
29 | 1345600 | 13688700
30 | 1440000 | 15128700
31 | 1537600 | 16666300
32 | 1638400 | 18304700
33 | 1742400 | 20047100
34 | 1849600 | 21896700
35 | 1960000 | 23856700
36 | 2073600 | 25930300
37 | 2190400 | 28120700
38 | 2310400 | 30431100
39 | 2433600 | 32864700
40 | 2560000 | 35424700
41 | 2689600 | 38114300
42 | 2822400 | 40936700
43 | 2958400 | 43895100
44 | 3097600 | 46992700
45 | 3240000 | 50232700
46 | 3385600 | 53618300
47 | 3534400 | 57152700
48 | 3686400 | 60839100
49 | 3841600 | 64680700

Given its going to take 64,680,700 you would need to get a least ~177k Ap a Day for a whole year to get there, its one hell of a grind, At PvP Rank 24 When you get your rank 10 Assault and support you are just over 10% of the way there.

Have fun, its going to be a long ride.

Are these numbers still accurate?

Thanks for the info.

Should be. I haven't see anything in the patch notes about a change to scoring and Alliance ranks.

Sallington

tinythinker wrote: »

Jaywics wrote: »

Spawn wrote: »

So i since i haven't seen it posted any where else i figure no one has really bothered to work out the formula so i figured i'd do it my self to take a look.

So the table below shows the rank points you need per level and then the total you gained at that level.


PvP Rank |Rank Points Till Next Level |Total Rank Points Gained
0 | 700 | 700
1 | 1600 | 2300
2 | 6400 | 8700
3 | 14400 | 23100
4 | 25600 | 48700
5 | 40000 | 88700
6 | 57600 | 146300
7 | 78400 | 224700
8 | 102400 | 327100
9 | 129600 | 456700
10 | 160000 | 616700
11 | 193600 | 810300
12 | 230400 | 1040700
13 | 270400 | 1311100
14 | 313600 | 1624700
15 | 360000 | 1984700
16 | 409600 | 2394300
17 | 462400 | 2856700
18 | 518400 | 3375100
19 | 577600 | 3952700
20 | 640000 | 4592700
21 | 705600 | 5298300
22 | 774400 | 6072700
23 | 846400 | 6919100
24 | 921600 | 7840700
25 | 1000000 | 8840700
26 | 1081600 | 9922300
27 | 1166400 | 11088700
28 | 1254400 | 12343100
29 | 1345600 | 13688700
30 | 1440000 | 15128700
31 | 1537600 | 16666300
32 | 1638400 | 18304700
33 | 1742400 | 20047100
34 | 1849600 | 21896700
35 | 1960000 | 23856700
36 | 2073600 | 25930300
37 | 2190400 | 28120700
38 | 2310400 | 30431100
39 | 2433600 | 32864700
40 | 2560000 | 35424700
41 | 2689600 | 38114300
42 | 2822400 | 40936700
43 | 2958400 | 43895100
44 | 3097600 | 46992700
45 | 3240000 | 50232700
46 | 3385600 | 53618300
47 | 3534400 | 57152700
48 | 3686400 | 60839100
49 | 3841600 | 64680700

Given its going to take 64,680,700 you would need to get a least ~177k Ap a Day for a whole year to get there, its one hell of a grind, At PvP Rank 24 When you get your rank 10 Assault and support you are just over 10% of the way there.

Have fun, its going to be a long ride.

Are these numbers still accurate?

Thanks for the info.

Should be. I haven't see anything in the patch notes about a change to scoring and Alliance ranks.

I'm pretty sure nothing has changed.

Ghostbane

The addon PvPRanks has been very accurate in terms of all my toons ranks and skill lines with AP. Its numbers are very close/exact to these.

Decado

That's a whole lot of mutagen!

Crown

I'm about 900k away from level 50, have been PvP'ing for about a year and a half, and have 160 days played - if that gives you an idea of time needed.

Wollust

that's quite a lot of towers to repair hehe

Amica

Natjur wrote: »

Any fast way to 'grind' PVP levels? Beside join a ZERG?

I have been trying to find a way to unlock Dets in under vets on Ronin San by just solo pvping. Truth is, i found waiting at a keep being attacked is the fastest way. Once the other faction has died put in /yell "GO AFTER THEM PEOPLE" most of the time they run off leaving you the tick lol.

Sanct16

@Crown

Time to start leveling a new character :P

Crown

@Sanct16 I've actually been dreading it - as I'm really not looking forward to the grind, skyshard hunting, lorebook hunting, undead kill grinding, doing all the dungeons for skill points, quest lines for skill points, ven dungeons for skill points, and leveling up all the skill lines. I've done all that once - it's not going to be fun doing it again.

Skyshards and lore books at least should be account wide.

Pchela

Crown wrote: »

@Sanct16 I've actually been dreading it - as I'm really not looking forward to the grind, skyshard hunting, lorebook hunting, undead kill grinding, doing all the dungeons for skill points, quest lines for skill points, ven dungeons for skill points, and leveling up all the skill lines. I've done all that once - it's not going to be fun doing it again.

Skyshards and lore books at least should be account wide.

It's not so bad! I got multiple v16 just get a partner and take a day for shards and books

Undaunted sucks tho.

Sanct16

Crown wrote: »

@Sanct16 I've actually been dreading it - as I'm really not looking forward to the grind, skyshard hunting, lorebook hunting, undead kill grinding, doing all the dungeons for skill points, quest lines for skill points, ven dungeons for skill points, and leveling up all the skill lines. I've done all that once - it's not going to be fun doing it again.

Skyshards and lore books at least should be account wide.

I fully agree. Grinding sucks *** and I'd be happy if ZOS would give me either account wide stuff to reduce the need for grinding or even just puts all that *** to the crownstore. Especially Undaunted is a pain and I couldn't be arsed to get all the passive on any char other than my (former) main, which is now retired after reaching rank 50.

However getting whispers from *** that camohuntersnipe you 10v1 "Thanks for [Grand Overlord Slayer] noob" etc a couple of times leveling a new char doesn't seem such a bad idea.

SkylarkAU

It would be nice if alliance ranks were account based instead of character based.. Added up I have 60-70 "AR levels" across all my toons but if you add up the AP behind them then it would only equate to AR 33 (only 4 AR above my current highest AR29 toon). Not a great leap in the scheme of things.

The two main reasons I think account based should be the way to go are
1.) It would be easier to gauge the experience level of the people you're playing against as many players have rerolled over the last few major updates (maybe more relevant if/when arenas are released),
2.) pvp'ers and pve'ers would only need to grind out assault/support ranks once which would encourage more players to continue playing as well as try new things and/or develop better compositions for group play

asneakybanana

SkylarkAU wrote: »

It would be nice if alliance ranks were account based instead of character based.. Added up I have 60-70 "AR levels" across all my toons but if you add up the AP behind them then it would only equate to AR 33 (only 4 AR above my current highest AR29 toon). Not a great leap in the scheme of things.

The two main reasons I think account based should be the way to go are
1.) It would be easier to gauge the experience level of the people you're playing against as many players have rerolled over the last few major updates (maybe more relevant if/when arenas are released),
2.) pvp'ers and pve'ers would only need to grind out assault/support ranks once which would encourage more players to continue playing as well as try new things and/or develop better compositions for group play

I disagree with the acct wide skills. You would have people in the non vet with prox det and combat frenzy 2 just rolling zergs with never ending batswarms from the kbs. Acct wide rank I would be open to but what happens after 50? People who are 50 on one toon typically swap to another toon and start levelling that alliance rank but with acct wide ar you would have no push to do that.

Crown

The alliance RANK should be account wide, but each character should have their skill line level independently, so you could be AR50, with skill line level 1 on a new toon.

Sanct16

asneakybanana wrote: »

SkylarkAU wrote: »

It would be nice if alliance ranks were account based instead of character based.. Added up I have 60-70 "AR levels" across all my toons but if you add up the AP behind them then it would only equate to AR 33 (only 4 AR above my current highest AR29 toon). Not a great leap in the scheme of things.

The two main reasons I think account based should be the way to go are
1.) It would be easier to gauge the experience level of the people you're playing against as many players have rerolled over the last few major updates (maybe more relevant if/when arenas are released),
2.) pvp'ers and pve'ers would only need to grind out assault/support ranks once which would encourage more players to continue playing as well as try new things and/or develop better compositions for group play

I disagree with the acct wide skills. You would have people in the non vet with prox det and combat frenzy 2 just rolling zergs with never ending batswarms from the kbs. Acct wide rank I would be open to but what happens after 50? People who are 50 on one toon typically swap to another toon and start levelling that alliance rank but with acct wide ar you would have no push to do that.

Account wide ranks would be so moist. We would have so many stars in our group. Sooooo maaaaaany staaaaars GIEF ME!

Zavus

Pchela wrote: »

Crown wrote: »

@Sanct16 I've actually been dreading it - as I'm really not looking forward to the grind, skyshard hunting, lorebook hunting, undead kill grinding, doing all the dungeons for skill points, quest lines for skill points, ven dungeons for skill points, and leveling up all the skill lines. I've done all that once - it's not going to be fun doing it again.

Skyshards and lore books at least should be account wide.

It's not so bad! I got multiple v16 just get a partner and take a day for shards and books

Undaunted sucks tho.

Do not convince him to level another toon, I still need my achievement.

SkylarkAU

asneakybanana wrote: »

SkylarkAU wrote: »

It would be nice if alliance ranks were account based instead of character based.. Added up I have 60-70 "AR levels" across all my toons but if you add up the AP behind them then it would only equate to AR 33 (only 4 AR above my current highest AR29 toon). Not a great leap in the scheme of things.

The two main reasons I think account based should be the way to go are
1.) It would be easier to gauge the experience level of the people you're playing against as many players have rerolled over the last few major updates (maybe more relevant if/when arenas are released),
2.) pvp'ers and pve'ers would only need to grind out assault/support ranks once which would encourage more players to continue playing as well as try new things and/or develop better compositions for group play

I disagree with the acct wide skills. You would have people in the non vet with prox det and combat frenzy 2 just rolling zergs with never ending batswarms from the kbs. Acct wide rank I would be open to but what happens after 50? People who are 50 on one toon typically swap to another toon and start levelling that alliance rank but with acct wide ar you would have no push to do that.

True but if they can have no CP campaigns surely they can control that too if need be. With account wide AR you would be free to play whichever toon you want without having to worry about it!

Lucky28

Well, i'm not in any great rush to get to rank 50. after all, when i get to rank 50 it means i'm probably about to retire my character. So i got no problem taking my time with it.

Draxys

A while back, someone suggested the rank 50 icon should be the eagle/dragon/lion. They should add more ranks after 50, but the icon switches to the alliance symbol. Would be kickass imo.

Also, I'm for account wide alliance ranks but character based alliance skill lines. A few people with combat frenzy 2 in BWB would not be good for that campaign.

Decado

I'm actually really curious how high I would be on AR if it was account bound, I have unlocked prox det on 2 chars, have a third and forth pretty close and have Vigor on the last 4, I'm just to damn lazy to do the maths

Sanct16

Decado wrote: »

I'm actually really curious how high I would be on AR if it was account bound, I have unlocked prox det on 2 chars, have a third and forth pretty close and have Vigor on the last 4, I'm just to damn lazy to do the maths

Probably around pvp rank 28.

Decado

Sanct16 wrote: »

Decado wrote: »

I'm actually really curious how high I would be on AR if it was account bound, I have unlocked prox det on 2 chars, have a third and forth pretty close and have Vigor on the last 4, I'm just to damn lazy to do the maths

Probably around pvp rank 28.

Ah cheers that's not to bad atall

ArvenAldmeri

Rank 11 here. And I am pretty much annoyed I still need around million AP to get detonation... then I need to get vigor on my stamina NB... and stamina sorc... and magick det for my magicka NB... Too much grind... just NO.

Kartalin

Draxys wrote: »

A while back, someone suggested the rank 50 icon should be the eagle/dragon/lion. They should add more ranks after 50, but the icon switches to the alliance symbol. Would be kickass imo.

Also, I'm for account wide alliance ranks but character based alliance skill lines. A few people with combat frenzy 2 in BWB would not be good for that campaign.

Really like that first suggestion, would be a nice reward for those achieving that rank. And I absolutely agree with your second thought. Combat frenzy 2 would be OP enough, but could you imagine groups of vet alts running prox det bombs in BWB? New pvpers would have no idea what hit them. Vets would be using their lowbie alts to farm alliance ranks.

I do like the idea of having an account-wide rank with character based skill line progression. Non-vet pvpers would be able to spot the Clark Kents among all the Jimmy Olsens.

Burning_Talons

What about now?

Jaronking

Burning_Talons wrote: »

What about now?

It should be the same ask Hulk on xbox he should be able to tell you lol.

CatchMeTrolling

Burning_Talons wrote: »

What about now?

The requirement hasn't changed

Ni7eWa7ch

CatchMeTrolling wrote: »

Burning_Talons wrote: »

What about now?

The requirement hasn't changed

It did change since TG patch , read the notes. The requirement is lower now

Jaronking

Ni7eWa7ch wrote: »

CatchMeTrolling wrote: »

Burning_Talons wrote: »

What about now?

The requirement hasn't changed

It did change since TG patch , read the notes. The requirement is lower now

No it did not but that a simple mistake people can make.What Zos did was lower the amount of AP you need to collect in total to level up your Alliance assault rank.So the total alliance points to move up in the ranks are the same what has changed is how much AP it requiresrequires to level up assault.

Rylana

Thread should really be a sticky. One of the best threads this forum ever had.

Also just for funsies im doing it again...

36 - 25930300
26 - 9922300
21 - 5298300
21 - 5298300
21 - 5298300
15 - 1984700
13 - 1311100
11 - 810300

55 853 600 - just short of Overlord grade 2. Damn. If id just stuck with one toon