wrlifeboil wrote: »It's almost gut check time for eso with monthly subscriptions due in a few days for the early access players. So how many people are on eso? 1 million? 2 million? More? Less?
WoW reported they had 7.6 million subscribers on March 31 which was 0.2 million lower than on December 31. That is a pretty good number considering the Mist of Pandaria expansion is 18 months into a two year expansion pack cycle.
wrlifeboil wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Does it really matter how many play OP? Are you looking for some sort of validation like you are popular?
The reason why experienced mmo'ers watch WoW subscriber numbers is to gauge how much money WoW makes. In the end, that will determine how much money Blizzard can put back into game development, network and customer support and still pay off their stockholders.
That's why size does matter.
Totally false, WoW with his supposed million of players doesn't put out much content between expansions (one the main complain in the WoW community) and considering the last 3 expansions, I don't know wtf they do with the money...
EVE on the other side, with merely 500K is always putting out free expansion and content
Size matters only in bed and if it isn't your gut....
Woogawoman wrote: »Answer is: more than come to or post on the forums.
wrlifeboil wrote: »Could be a perception thing but it seems like the forums are scrolling much slower than 2-3 weeks ago. It could be a good sign in that ZOS has fixed all the bugs in the game so fewer players are coming to the forums. It could be a bad sign in that players are not as enthusiastic about the game or are now ex-players .
wrlifeboil wrote: »Could be a perception thing but it seems like the forums are scrolling much slower than 2-3 weeks ago. It could be a good sign in that ZOS has fixed all the bugs in the game so fewer players are coming to the forums. It could be a bad sign in that players are not as enthusiastic about the game or are now ex-players .
Considering you do not need to be a subscriber to the game to post on the forums, any conclusions you are drawing from forum traffic is completely irrelevant to the health of the game.
Game publishers these days are very hesitant in general to publish subs. The creator of MMOdata, which was always the best source for these figures, recently shut down his service due to exactly this.
I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here, and predict maybe... 400-450K players are still subscribed to ESO, this includes both NA/EU.
Why so low? Because people have simply gotten bored of the game, tired of all the bugs, and or just didn't enjoy the game, and moved onto something that interests them more.
Quite a few players actually moved from ESO to ArcheAge Alpha, and have spent $150 (Such as myself) to get into the Alpha, of course, I play both games ArcheAge, and this, and believe from the enjoyment I'm getting from both, it was worth the money.
I think anyone who believes there are over 500K subs to ESO still are in denial of how poor ESO seemed to have executed the launch/Early Access and so forth.
but as long as there are still players to party with and, everyone is not a familiar face, I'm satisfied.
wrlifeboil wrote: »Woogawoman wrote: »Answer is: more than come to or post on the forums.
Could be a perception thing but it seems like the forums are scrolling much slower than 2-3 weeks ago. It could be a good sign in that ZOS has fixed all the bugs in the game so fewer players are coming to the forums. It could be a bad sign in that players are not as enthusiastic about the game or are now ex-players .
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »wrlifeboil wrote: »Could be a perception thing but it seems like the forums are scrolling much slower than 2-3 weeks ago. It could be a good sign in that ZOS has fixed all the bugs in the game so fewer players are coming to the forums. It could be a bad sign in that players are not as enthusiastic about the game or are now ex-players .
Considering you do not need to be a subscriber to the game to post on the forums, any conclusions you are drawing from forum traffic is completely irrelevant to the health of the game.
You had to get an invite somehow tho. You cant just sign up for a forum account. I guess the people here who are not subbed are from beta?
wait...what the hell are you doing on this forum? your using logic damn you! lol Ok joking aside that makes sense, never thought about it but i owned 3 accounts when i played WoW. i know some who own 5-7...no clue WHY they own so many but my friends are crazy.wrlifeboil wrote: »It's almost gut check time for eso with monthly subscriptions due in a few days for the early access players. So how many people are on eso? 1 million? 2 million? More? Less?
WoW reported they had 7.6 million subscribers on March 31 which was 0.2 million lower than on December 31. That is a pretty good number considering the Mist of Pandaria expansion is 18 months into a two year expansion pack cycle.
Only ZO knows this.
As for Blizz, there are many people with 5 or more accounts, almost everyone I know has at least two, plus the amount of Asians and bots so yes the numbers are very high, but they don't really translate into success or actual human players. I would guess there might be 2-3 Mio still playing WoW which is still a lot, but there are F2P´s with a lot more.
Thechemicals wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Thechemicals wrote: »I am not certain but i believe the asian market might not exist because of the look and setting of this game.
The game isnt allowed in CHina for one because of undead. The chinese have culture laws that prevent depicting honored ancesters in negative ways, ie skeletons/zombies. Zenimax would have to redesign the game for a chinese market.
So its the look and setting lol. What hapened with warcraft in china? Very popular+ has undead, will travel.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here, and predict maybe... 400-450K players are still subscribed to ESO, this includes both NA/EU.
Why so low? Because people have simply gotten bored of the game, tired of all the bugs, and or just didn't enjoy the game, and moved onto something that interests them more.
Quite a few players actually moved from ESO to ArcheAge Alpha, and have spent $150 (Such as myself) to get into the Alpha, of course, I play both games ArcheAge, and this, and believe from the enjoyment I'm getting from both, it was worth the money.
I think anyone who believes there are over 500K subs to ESO still are in denial of how poor ESO seemed to have executed the launch/Early Access and so forth.
but as long as there are still players to party with and, everyone is not a familiar face, I'm satisfied.
I think you are crazy if you think 3/4 of the people who bought the game have already left. thats just silly.
You're obviously blind to the cold hard truth then. The game has already renounced itself as probably the worst Mmorpg launch of all time by now. In all my years of Alpha, Beta testing, and playing pretty much any Mmorpg you can name out there, I've personally never seen any Beta, let alone a launch where you couldn't complete a quest.