ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks for bringing this to our attention, everyone. We're looking into it now.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Lawlicaust wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »And I take it youre one of these jerks that spawn camp? Or you have friends that spawn camp. Because I cant imagine why someone would idiotically blame the victim here. Unless they had something worth protecting.
Because laughing at them for the idiocy is hilarious? Seriously, go out to Bankorai or Reapers and watch group of people trying to get bit. 50+ people standing around two mobs trying to hit them and get aggro. No one has to camp and kill the mobs because they are killing them just by trying to get bit.
Meanwhile, 20 feet away, there is another spawn that one smart person is at with a taunt equipped.
I never denied people were killing them. But the idea that you can't possibly get bit because there is some illuminati conspiracy is laughable.
So youve moved up from blaming victims to character assassination by claiming theyre conspiracy theorists now?
This is starting to become humorous. Only because you seem to believe that if you raise the bar...People will begin to buy into your crap.
Omar_Comin wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno does this mean you will be looking into the death threats, *** threats and other forms of abuse that has been used in public and private channels to those that are killing spawns, those who are suspected of killing spawns, and those who are claiming to kill spawns?
I'd like to know which is the more serious issue to be dealt with, killing a mob in a videogame or threatening to hunt someone down in real life and kill them.
Omar_Comin wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno does this mean you will be looking into the death threats, *** threats and other forms of abuse that has been used in public and private channels to those that are killing spawns, those who are suspected of killing spawns, and those who are claiming to kill spawns?
I'd like to know which is the more serious issue to be dealt with, killing a mob in a videogame or threatening to hunt someone down in real life and kill them.
Customer Service should be thoroughly investigating any of those you report. I'm not sure why it would warrant special mention, they typically take that stuff extremely seriously.
selling a bite should not be reported, thats jsut a usual trade, the skill has 7days cooldown you know? giving it out for free would be stupid.MercyKilling wrote: »Report each and every single one of them. If you see someone advertising in zone chat to sell vamp/ww bites....report them, too. Let Zenimax determine if it's a bannable offense, as it isn't a player's call. All we can do is point out things that we -think- might be against the ToS.
@ZOS_GinaBruno does this mean you will be looking into the death threats, (rhymes with grape) threats and other forms of abuse that has been used in public and private channels to those that are killing spawns, those who are suspected of killing spawns, and those who are claiming to kill spawns?
I'd like to know which is the more serious issue to be dealt with, killing a mob in a videogame or threatening to hunt someone down in real life and kill them.
phreatophile wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno does this mean you will be looking into the death threats, (rhymes with grape) threats and other forms of abuse that has been used in public and private channels to those that are killing spawns, those who are suspected of killing spawns, and those who are claiming to kill spawns?
I'd like to know which is the more serious issue to be dealt with, killing a mob in a videogame or threatening to hunt someone down in real life and kill them.
If it's been reported I'm sure they will. Neither one is especially serious, one is killing an imaginary creature to annoy other people and the other is impotent, anonymous, and impossible to take seriously. But it is what one comes to expect from griefers, they are supposed to be allowed to screw with people with impunity but act the victim if someone even talks back to them.
selling a bite isn't an offense, thats just a usual trade,
liquid_wolf wrote: »2 Things
Report, and encourage Zenimax to smack these griefers down.
Find a way around their griefing for now.
Log in and out. Get on really early or really late. Over lunch.
Prime Time is probably going to be a bad time for this.
MercyKilling wrote: »Report each and every single one of them. If you see someone advertising in zone chat to sell vamp/ww bites....report them, too. Let Zenimax determine if it's a bannable offense, as it isn't a player's call. All we can do is point out things that we -think- might be against the ToS.
Who says selling the bites is against the ToS though?
I'm not sure I see anything wrong with people willing to pay for a bite.
The problem is when their griefing to make sure they're the only way to get it.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »I think it would be wrong to stop this. Speaking as someone who had a guild do that, and managed to get bitten anyways. Why? Because it makes things more interesting. More immersive as well. Vampire hunting squads? Werewolf hunters? That is awesome.
Although I think selling bites is wrong as well (I give mine for free to guildies first, then random). Buying a bite is a quick way to get scammed as well.
anyways, point being, vampire/wolf hunting groups are fine for the immersion/game.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »I think it would be wrong to stop this. Speaking as someone who had a guild do that, and managed to get bitten anyways. Why? Because it makes things more interesting. More immersive as well. Vampire hunting squads? Werewolf hunters? That is awesome.
Although I think selling bites is wrong as well (I give mine for free to guildies first, then random). Buying a bite is a quick way to get scammed as well.
anyways, point being, vampire/wolf hunting groups are fine for the immersion/game.
I think this is wrong because of the sum of it: camping mobs, killing them with the objective of prevent other players from getting a bite and selling the bites knowing they will have to do it.
I don't think those individual actions are so harmful by themselvs, maybe questionable, but all of them together are.
I would never blame a new player that kills a mob without knowing all this, or a player who just likes to kill vampires/werewolves. I also think vampirism and lycanthropy should be very rare, with as many handicaps as advantages, not just something everyone wants to have because it's cool or overpowered. Even having that in mind, I don't like the fact that we have a group of people deciding the way other people can have access to something provided by the game.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »They don't HAVE to get bitten, they can relog to different "phases" where the players aren't there, etc... How about taking the fun out of players pretending to be vampire/wolf hunters? Are they killing them for profit, or for fun/roleplaying?
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »I think it would be wrong to stop this. Speaking as someone who had a guild do that, and managed to get bitten anyways. Why? Because it makes things more interesting. More immersive as well. Vampire hunting squads? Werewolf hunters? That is awesome.
Although I think selling bites is wrong as well (I give mine for free to guildies first, then random). Buying a bite is a quick way to get scammed as well.
anyways, point being, vampire/wolf hunting groups are fine for the immersion/game.
I think this is wrong because of the sum of it: camping mobs, killing them with the objective of prevent other players from getting a bite and selling the bites knowing they will have to do it.
I don't think those individual actions are so harmful by themselvs, maybe questionable, but all of them together are.
I would never blame a new player that kills a mob without knowing all this, or a player who just likes to kill vampires/werewolves. I also think vampirism and lycanthropy should be very rare, with as many handicaps as advantages, not just something everyone wants to have because it's cool or overpowered. Even having that in mind, I don't like the fact that we have a group of people deciding the way other people can have access to something provided by the game.
They don't HAVE to get bitten, they can relog to different "phases" where the players aren't there, etc... How about taking the fun out of players pretending to be vampire/wolf hunters? Are they killing them for profit, or for fun/roleplaying?
There are ways around this, and there isn't a reason for this to be reportable.
I reported that part specifically because it's hypocritical. Youre deciding to take away their fun/access to roleplaying.
With that said, I do agree with you it should be more rare to becoming vamp/wolf.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »They don't HAVE to get bitten, they can relog to different "phases" where the players aren't there, etc... How about taking the fun out of players pretending to be vampire/wolf hunters? Are they killing them for profit, or for fun/roleplaying?
I'm sure some will claim that's why they're doing it. Just as some justify other actions as "roleplaying a jerk". I'm sure Zenimax will have the logging capability to determine who's being honest.
Darkstar4758 wrote: »Let me preface my statement with the fact that I am a lowly level 16 and know nothing about how to contract vampirism / lycanthropy ... BUT, I think one solution to this problem would be for the people who know the mechanics to share that info with others, especially players willing to bite for free. This would take the wind right out of a lot (not all) of the griefers sails.
Because the people mad about people killing pixels think they're entirely justified in wishing *grape* threats, death threats and other violence upon people in some weird form of mental gymnastics and usually that sort of behavior is excused if enough people think someone "deserves" it (they don't).
phreatophile wrote: »Because the people mad about people killing pixels think they're entirely justified in wishing *grape* threats, death threats and other violence upon people in some weird form of mental gymnastics and usually that sort of behavior is excused if enough people think someone "deserves" it (they don't).
For the record, I didn't say is was excused or deserved. I actually said it was "impotent, anonymous, and impossible to take seriously" and that if reported it would likely be dealt with.
But I did mention the irony of complaining about the verbal abuse to deflect from the other abuse that all in all IS (as you said) just killing pixels.