spartaxoxo wrote: »The forums have a lower age rating than the game
spartaxoxo wrote: »The forums have a lower age rating than the game
That is interesting notion, considering you need to buy the game to get the forum invite as far as I understand it.
ZOS_ConnorG wrote: »After review we have had to edit or remove several posts for Inappropriate Content. Even though ESO is rated M for Mature by the ESRB for, among other things, Sexual Themes, the ESO Forums have a lower age rating than that of the game. This means that content within ESO is not necessarily permitted on the forums, for example Sexual Theme (i.e. Inappropriate Content).
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »The forums have a lower age rating than the game
That is interesting notion, considering you need to buy the game to get the forum invite as far as I understand it.
Yeah. I suspect it's because you don't need to buy the game to view the forums, only to post in it. So, to be safe they just make the website a lower age rating. Although, I'm fairly certain it's PG13 not E. So, I might be wrong about that. I can't remember where I saw that. I did find a mod posting about it though. I think that's something that would be interesting to hear about the reasoning.ZOS_ConnorG wrote: »After review we have had to edit or remove several posts for Inappropriate Content. Even though ESO is rated M for Mature by the ESRB for, among other things, Sexual Themes, the ESO Forums have a lower age rating than that of the game. This means that content within ESO is not necessarily permitted on the forums, for example Sexual Theme (i.e. Inappropriate Content).
"After a hard week of farming, or a long night of being nagged by your wife, there is nothing better than going out for a bit of a fish."
Araneae6537 wrote: »Would you be less stressed if you didn’t feel a need to report anything against the rules? I rarely report anything unless I see someone being attacked or disrespected. For instance, against the rules or no, I don’t see any need to report posts as in the thread referenced, which were meant as jokes, though not everyone’s taste in humor, but not aimed at anyone and harmless in my opinion.
I realize that different things stress different people, but so long as you’re following the rules yourself (and I don’t think that is in question), it isn’t your job but the moderators’ to worry about what others post (at least that’s what I’m interpreting as the source of stress from your post).
(Edited for clarity, hopefully.)
Ishtarknows wrote: »We need a disagree button.
No.
Ishtarknows wrote: »We need a disagree button.Ishtarknows wrote: »We need a disagree button.
No.
Why not?
29 people (at least) would disagree with you. Why should we only be able to emote in agreement with a post and not show that we do not agree?
Ishtarknows wrote: »We need a disagree button.Ishtarknows wrote: »We need a disagree button.
No.
Why not?
29 people (at least) would disagree with you. Why should we only be able to emote in agreement with a post and not show that we do not agree?
In other forums I've used that have had a disagree option, it has rapidly become a not-so-subtle method of trolling, and therefore got removed fairly quickly. They still seem to have somewhat of that situation on reddit for instance.
IIRC they did used to have something like that here, but found it also caused mass trolling and did away with it.
Thank you all for your helpful comments. ... I've learned that I'm too sensitive and passionate about the forums, and that if something is bothering me, it's best to try and step away, but it's so hard sometimes. And I need to let the moderators do their job, I know they have a tough one sometimes.
Monte_Cristo wrote: »Which is still a bit strange, as it means there are parts of the game, including in game dialogue and lore books, that can't be mentioned or talked about on the forum.
Oh right - @Danikat, I wasn't here back that far, forgot it was "lol" instead of disagree.
I came to the forums not only to give out my suggestions, feedback, and ideas, but also to improve. The reasons why I am on these forums is to hopefully overcome my online struggles, become stronger, to learn how to read and understand others better, to write better, and that I am finally considered someone who is worthy of listening to.
SilverBride wrote: »I came to the forums not only to give out my suggestions, feedback, and ideas, but also to improve. The reasons why I am on these forums is to hopefully overcome my online struggles, become stronger, to learn how to read and understand others better, to write better, and that I am finally considered someone who is worthy of listening to.
The mere fact that posters open your threads and read them shows that they do consider you someone worth listening to. Even if they don't agree with your idea or suggestion, they still took the time to see what you had to say.
One of my favorite posters on this forum is a person I rarely share the same viewpoint with. We are like polar opposites in many of our views but I hold her in the higest regard because of how knowledgable and respectful her posts are. So not agreeing with someone doesn't mean we don't value them as a productive poster.
Tyrant_Tim wrote: »Back to an earlier thread regarding Forum Feedback, this is exactly why we need to axe General as a forum category.
When I get on my phone, I don’t want to read about drama, or people getting overly emotional, I want to see if anyone posted anything interesting game related, or if anyone has any questions from playing the game.
While I sympathize with the OP, the Forums are not the place to develop character, or a place to vent a mental health crisis.
Rogue_WolfESO wrote: »I haven't been able to figure out why profanity used by players of a game intended for mature players is concerning.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Moderators are less active late night, so you may need to wait until normal business hours for something to be handled sometimes.
In addition, we had stricter moderation before and the community begged for it to be less restrictive. Nobody is perfect and part of the mods job is to not only enforce the rules, but to use reasonable discretion to facilitate productive and positive communication. So, that people feel free to share their opinions. Over reporting can also cause people who are pretty normal posters to be banned for life unfairly. Just because very minor mistakes that are so minor that not everyone would even agree it breaks the rules can add up.
As a general rule, mods err towards keeping threads peaceful and not attacking others. They aren't there to scare people to having the perfect communication skills of a professional PR agent. They are there to keep discourse respectful and mostly on topic. The one in question didn't use profanity to offend or hurt anyone (in fact it was censored), but to make people laugh. And it was received in that light by everyone in that thread. So, clearly they let it slide. A harmless joke that made everyone posting in the thread laugh is significantly more likely to be shown a little grace than someone attacking another.
It is very obvious that the censored out bad word is the bad F-bomb. Everyone knows what that word is because it was not totally censored.
I never use profanity in any case what so ever, and it never once made me laugh (That's why I don't find tasteless jokes funny). Just because others say "its fine to use profanity" that doesn't mean I should be using it. I know its wrong to use profanity. Lots of those bad words(profanity) have extremely inappropriate definitions and very harsh meanings behind them. I also say that profanity usage is overrated/annoying.
Its a complicated topic because everyone has different views of what are bad words(profanity) or not. Its better to be safe than sorry and to keep profanity off the forums no matter what the circumstances are.