To coincide with this, they need to make random veterans much more enticing so higher level players would prefer to run those and leave the normals to new players, less experienced players and people under level 50
To coincide with this, they need to make random veterans much more enticing so higher level players would prefer to run those and leave the normals to new players, less experienced players and people under level 50
To coincide with this, they need to make random veterans much more enticing so higher level players would prefer to run those and leave the normals to new players, less experienced players and people under level 50
How would they make random veteran runs more enticing? Better rewards/more XP/more transmute crystals?
Because I would predict that those sort of rewards would probably entice also a lot of inexperienced/newer players to queue for that setting as soon they could, and bring about perhaps more groups that aren't prepared to clear content of that type of difficulty, which would perhaps lead to increased frustration.
ForzaRammer wrote: »I see fake DD way more often than fake support, in both proportion and total
Dem_kitkats1 wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »I see fake DD way more often than fake support, in both proportion and total
I mean...that's risk you run in PUG rnds. You cant really complain about the caliber of players in areas that have the highest amount of new/casual players, who have little to no knowledge about builds, mechanics, and combat. Or if DDs are focused more on survivability than damage, it's because they've probably had bad experiences with fake supports. It's a vicious cycle really.
Either way, claiming that players are fake in all roles furthers the argument that fake queuing is an issue. We can't excuse bad etiquette in normals and then wonder why it bleeds into vet content.
If you want to level up fast, slot damage skills and a taunt. Also what is your issue with orc spell casters [snip]?
SpacemanSpiff1 wrote: »why did have to get racial with it?
People are quick to complain about fake tanks and healers(on normal difficulty) and say they just want to skip the queue time for DPS, which is honestly pretty true. The other side of the issue is the lack of real tanks and healers in the queue for multiple reasons: 1. these roles are not needed in the vast majority of normal dungeons 2. many supports will play with premade groups and won't risk getting a low DPS group in which they feel bored and powerless. If you want people to really tank and heal, the average player's DPS needs to go up to make it worth it, which realistically is never gonna happen. I'm a tank main with every good tank set in the game and I will never tank a random again after some of the groups I've dealt with. I'll only tank for friends and guildies.
ForzaRammer wrote: »Dem_kitkats1 wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »I see fake DD way more often than fake support, in both proportion and total
I mean...that's risk you run in PUG rnds. You cant really complain about the caliber of players in areas that have the highest amount of new/casual players, who have little to no knowledge about builds, mechanics, and combat. Or if DDs are focused more on survivability than damage, it's because they've probably had bad experiences with fake supports. It's a vicious cycle really.
Either way, claiming that players are fake in all roles furthers the argument that fake queuing is an issue. We can't excuse bad etiquette in normals and then wonder why it bleeds into vet content.
Fake role queue is an issue, i am not disputing it.
I am pointing out the selective bias on calling people out.
Only going after the less prevalent problem (fake support) and ignoring the more prevalent problem (fake DD) is ridiculous.
Race has very little to do with anything outside of serious end game. Up to that point, you can roleplay whatever you want.
Outside of race (which for healer is generally viewed as altmer being best), the weapon choice is also somewhat subjective. Naturally, one would expect a restoration staff. But you have two bars. Why wouldn't you use an inferno staff in dungeon content? What would you suggest healers use?
I don't disagree that fake roles offer a negative experience for newer players, especially when that newer player ends up face-tanking a boss when a tank should have aggro, but you're arguing the wrong things. Racial choices have generally little to do with capabilities, and weapon choices are going through changes now that we have hybridisation. I've seen a couple healers running bow or two-hander with a restoration staff, just because they can get a little more DPS from it (and why not, as long as they're not actively letting people die).
Jarl_Ironheart wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »Dem_kitkats1 wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »I see fake DD way more often than fake support, in both proportion and total
I mean...that's risk you run in PUG rnds. You cant really complain about the caliber of players in areas that have the highest amount of new/casual players, who have little to no knowledge about builds, mechanics, and combat. Or if DDs are focused more on survivability than damage, it's because they've probably had bad experiences with fake supports. It's a vicious cycle really.
Either way, claiming that players are fake in all roles furthers the argument that fake queuing is an issue. We can't excuse bad etiquette in normals and then wonder why it bleeds into vet content.
Fake role queue is an issue, i am not disputing it.
I am pointing out the selective bias on calling people out.
Only going after the less prevalent problem (fake support) and ignoring the more prevalent problem (fake DD) is ridiculous.
I really don't think fake DDs are a issue. At least I'm never really seem any. There are newer players or less skilled players that deal less damage but at the end of the day unless a DD is trying to heal or tank or literally doung no damage then they aren't a fake DD. Just not a good DD yet.
ForzaRammer wrote: »Jarl_Ironheart wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »Dem_kitkats1 wrote: »ForzaRammer wrote: »I see fake DD way more often than fake support, in both proportion and total
I mean...that's risk you run in PUG rnds. You cant really complain about the caliber of players in areas that have the highest amount of new/casual players, who have little to no knowledge about builds, mechanics, and combat. Or if DDs are focused more on survivability than damage, it's because they've probably had bad experiences with fake supports. It's a vicious cycle really.
Either way, claiming that players are fake in all roles furthers the argument that fake queuing is an issue. We can't excuse bad etiquette in normals and then wonder why it bleeds into vet content.
Fake role queue is an issue, i am not disputing it.
I am pointing out the selective bias on calling people out.
Only going after the less prevalent problem (fake support) and ignoring the more prevalent problem (fake DD) is ridiculous.
I really don't think fake DDs are a issue. At least I'm never really seem any. There are newer players or less skilled players that deal less damage but at the end of the day unless a DD is trying to heal or tank or literally doung no damage then they aren't a fake DD. Just not a good DD yet.
Nice try but no. All taunts in this game do damage, if anyone who do any damage is a real DD, then all tanks are DD.
I think you know 'tank is a subset of DD' is ridiculous.
A human player indifferent to a companion (or worse) is definitely a fake.