silvereyes wrote: »Use some of your daily login XP scrolls to grind to level 10, then go unlock the Assault skill line in Cyrodiil for the Continuous Attack passive. You can also stick 100 CP into the Gifted Rider star. Between those two mount speed buffs, you can be at +40% mount speed within an hour.
I was replying to @drsalvation, but I wanted to include your correction about the time to level horse training. Sorry for the confusion.Sylvermynx wrote: »silvereyes wrote: »Use some of your daily login XP scrolls to grind to level 10, then go unlock the Assault skill line in Cyrodiil for the Continuous Attack passive. You can also stick 100 CP into the Gifted Rider star. Between those two mount speed buffs, you can be at +40% mount speed within an hour.
Nah. I already don't use mounts because it's just way too fast. Don't like it, prefer just running.
silvereyes wrote: »I was replying to @drsalvation, but I wanted to include your correction about the time to level horse training. Sorry for the confusion.Sylvermynx wrote: »silvereyes wrote: »Use some of your daily login XP scrolls to grind to level 10, then go unlock the Assault skill line in Cyrodiil for the Continuous Attack passive. You can also stick 100 CP into the Gifted Rider star. Between those two mount speed buffs, you can be at +40% mount speed within an hour.
Nah. I already don't use mounts because it's just way too fast. Don't like it, prefer just running.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »I don't want my main mocked by achievements he would never earn himself being forever incomplete in his achievement collections like the Werewolf achievements because he is a pure Vampire and has been one constantly since 2015 , before this change ZOS made I had no intention of every going after any achievements on any of my characters, now I actually have motivation to do them.
Don't ruin this for people like me.
I wouldn't try to read anything into the percentages. The "everyone wins" option explicitly says to pick that option as a compromise, even if the player only cares about one side or the other. Those people could just as easily have gone into another column, if they were led that way with different wording.Interesting that the highest vote (not even the highest combined) is the wow-style "everyone wins" version, despite the people on the feedback thread who seem to think that account-wide achievements only are wanted by the "majority" of players.
Hm.
Sylvermynx wrote: »It's not something I care about personally - I don't pay attention to achievements and I don't use titles. I would like to see ZOS do something to make everyone happy about this though.
Sylvermynx wrote: »It's not something I care about personally - I don't pay attention to achievements and I don't use titles. I would like to see ZOS do something to make everyone happy about this though.
Does it concern you that as the new system is currently on the PTS, once one character has completed an achievement such as completing a delve or catching a rare fish, your other characters will be unable to receive any acknowledgement for doing so, and that some achievement-based quests simply won't be able to be done by more than one character? Also, if one character has completed a zone both the map and zone guide will be largely completed when another character enters the zone for the first time. For me a lot of the fun of playing multiple characters is exploring, unlocking and completing content more than once. These things are seriously compromised on the PTS.
Yeah I agree. The options are way too convoluted and confusing, there is no question that the poll options address, and there’s loaded language in the options like having achievements “obliterated”. All of this makes it hard to infer much from this poll. It’s still interesting information but I sat this one out because the poll is not well constructed. Sorry op, I appreciate what you are trying to do here, I just disagree with the approach.silvereyes wrote: »I wouldn't try to read anything into the percentages. The "everyone wins" option explicitly says to pick that option as a compromise, even if the player only cares about one side or the other. Those people could just as easily have gone into another column, if they were led that way with different wording.Interesting that the highest vote (not even the highest combined) is the wow-style "everyone wins" version, despite the people on the feedback thread who seem to think that account-wide achievements only are wanted by the "majority" of players.
Hm.
So long as they don't screw everyone's accounts when implementing the changes I have no problem with it. Would like account wide motifs and recipes though.
SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »I don't want my main mocked by achievements he would never earn himself being forever incomplete in his achievement collections like the Werewolf achievements because he is a pure Vampire and has been one constantly since 2015 , before this change ZOS made I had no intention of every going after any achievements on any of my characters, now I actually have motivation to do them.
Don't ruin this for people like me.
See, this makes me curious - if you have been a vampire since 2015, and you had no interest in him being a Werewolf, why does it matter now? Why are the achievements he would never earn ‘mocking’ him?
silvereyes wrote: »I wouldn't try to read anything into the percentages. The "everyone wins" option explicitly says to pick that option as a compromise, even if the player only cares about one side or the other. Those people could just as easily have gone into another column, if they were led that way with different wording.Interesting that the highest vote (not even the highest combined) is the wow-style "everyone wins" version, despite the people on the feedback thread who seem to think that account-wide achievements only are wanted by the "majority" of players.
Hm.
First of all, it's not selflessness - or at least not primarily selflessness - that leads people to put themselves in the compromise camp. It's a lack of strong feelings about the other option, or perhaps a sense of fatalism that ZOS probably won't change course significantly, so a compromise is what they're left with.silvereyes wrote: »I wouldn't try to read anything into the percentages. The "everyone wins" option explicitly says to pick that option as a compromise, even if the player only cares about one side or the other. Those people could just as easily have gone into another column, if they were led that way with different wording.Interesting that the highest vote (not even the highest combined) is the wow-style "everyone wins" version, despite the people on the feedback thread who seem to think that account-wide achievements only are wanted by the "majority" of players.
Hm.
I will read in. This is the fairest option that is the best for everyone concerned. It is also how it is done in other MMOs. Seems to me that even if others would prefer one or the other, the least selfish are also okay with everyone being happy.
Silverfaerie wrote: »I wanted account achievements. but the way its implemented in pts is absolutely bonkers. you should be able to do quests and individually complete achievements on characters even with overall accountwide tracking data. the fact that delves autocomplete on alts if you finished them on at least one character, the fact that you cannot pick up collection quests on alts, because QUEST AVAILABILITY???? is tied to an achievement? is absolutely insane.
given current implementation I'd rather they didn't implement it at all then add it in its current form.