AJones43865 wrote: »Yep it's just hard to believe. I replaced a whole company worth of servers during the pandemic. (Phone and internet company) No problems getting server RAM, SSD hard drives, and the whole servers themselves from Dell. There may have been an extra week or 2 for shipping but no problems at all otherwise. I'm sure they need a lot of hardware but a company like them would be moved to the front of the line.
I will disagree that stuff is showing up like it used to, but as someone who also builds/replaces TONS of server infrastructure, the worst case I have seen is 8 months. Had they actually ordered the hardware when they announced they were, it would have arrived and been able to install many months ago. I am of the opinion they never ordered it, and probably still haven't.
I am actually wondering if we will know. I mean, they can be installing hardware and getting it ready at any time. I would imagine that the upgrades are replacements. They can install and test it without taking down the servers. During some maintenance, they switch over to the new hardware and turn off the old. They don't have to do it all at once, either. They can do it in batches. The bottom line is that if they don't tell us, we won't know.
We will know if performance improves or not. We will know. As customers we absolutely can determine what is going on based upon the results. If nothing gets better, as it hasn't consistently for years, then we will know whether or not we are still being strung along. Frankly, and I'm not just speaking for myself here, I feel like ZOS is dragging the customers behind their metaphorical truck on some dusty back road somewhere and laughing at us for thanking them for it.
I don't think we will be able to tell when they upgrade the hardware. Given they say the issues with performance are based on bad code, upgrading hardware isn't likely to fix anything with performance.
AJones43865 wrote: »Yep it's just hard to believe. I replaced a whole company worth of servers during the pandemic. (Phone and internet company) No problems getting server RAM, SSD hard drives, and the whole servers themselves from Dell. There may have been an extra week or 2 for shipping but no problems at all otherwise. I'm sure they need a lot of hardware but a company like them would be moved to the front of the line.
I will disagree that stuff is showing up like it used to, but as someone who also builds/replaces TONS of server infrastructure, the worst case I have seen is 8 months. Had they actually ordered the hardware when they announced they were, it would have arrived and been able to install many months ago. I am of the opinion they never ordered it, and probably still haven't.
I am actually wondering if we will know. I mean, they can be installing hardware and getting it ready at any time. I would imagine that the upgrades are replacements. They can install and test it without taking down the servers. During some maintenance, they switch over to the new hardware and turn off the old. They don't have to do it all at once, either. They can do it in batches. The bottom line is that if they don't tell us, we won't know.
We will know if performance improves or not. We will know. As customers we absolutely can determine what is going on based upon the results. If nothing gets better, as it hasn't consistently for years, then we will know whether or not we are still being strung along. Frankly, and I'm not just speaking for myself here, I feel like ZOS is dragging the customers behind their metaphorical truck on some dusty back road somewhere and laughing at us.
AJones43865 wrote: »Yep it's just hard to believe. I replaced a whole company worth of servers during the pandemic. (Phone and internet company) No problems getting server RAM, SSD hard drives, and the whole servers themselves from Dell. There may have been an extra week or 2 for shipping but no problems at all otherwise. I'm sure they need a lot of hardware but a company like them would be moved to the front of the line.
I will disagree that stuff is showing up like it used to, but as someone who also builds/replaces TONS of server infrastructure, the worst case I have seen is 8 months. Had they actually ordered the hardware when they announced they were, it would have arrived and been able to install many months ago. I am of the opinion they never ordered it, and probably still haven't.
The problem is they've been telling us they are working on it for over 4 years now, and performance has gotten discernibly worse even though population caps have been slashed to roughly 75/players/faction.
Now they are telling us "they're working on it, and we have to wait at least another year before we see any results."
There is this story about a boy who cried wolf too many times. Eventually people stopped believing the boy.
At this point, and for at least the next year it sounds, the results will speak for themselves apparently.
I see we are back to the 1 year and we will fix it again. How about remove all proc sets till it is fixed. that will improve things... the last set that have come out for PVP have broken the game more.
There was no performance improvement from removing proc sets. I have no idea why this fallacy keeps being perpetuated.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/7149943/#Comment_7149943
Really, it's amazing "YOU" are saying that when "OTHERS" have said different. SO with that side, others see if different and so did I
Lol, "I" didn't say it. The people who wrote the game code and monitored the data from the no-proc tests said it. If you'd prefer to believe opinions versus facts, that's your prerogative.
shadyjane62 wrote: »Fix one dang thing. Fix the stuck in combat bug and I will believe you are serious about improving pvp.
OrdoHermetica wrote: »shadyjane62 wrote: »Fix one dang thing. Fix the stuck in combat bug and I will believe you are serious about improving pvp.
The fact that it has literally been several years since that bug was introduced and it still hasn't been fixed is a pretty good example of why I'm pretty dubious about this statement, yeah. I mean, I appreciate the communication, but at this point? I'll believe it when I see it, and not a moment before.
Pink_E_808 wrote: »I saved this video yesterday (PS5 NA GH). No one else around, and yet I can barely cap a resource. No, it's not always like this, but it's happening more often for sure. As a five star, it borders on embarrassing needing help to flip resources. I've kept my hopes up for a long, long time now but those are slowing waning and my frustrations are starting to outpace the hope. One of the things keeping me around still is knowing I'm not the only one having these kinds of issues. I love this game. I do not want to find another game. I've put so much time, effort and money into my account and I'm not ready to give it all up, so I am rooting for you ZOS. Please don't let us down.
https://youtu.be/GKLMeQLQYi0
Pink_E_808 wrote: »I saved this video yesterday (PS5 NA GH). No one else around, and yet I can barely cap a resource. No, it's not always like this, but it's happening more often for sure. As a five star, it borders on embarrassing needing help to flip resources. I've kept my hopes up for a long, long time now but those are slowing waning and my frustrations are starting to outpace the hope. One of the things keeping me around still is knowing I'm not the only one having these kinds of issues. I love this game. I do not want to find another game. I've put so much time, effort and money into my account and I'm not ready to give it all up, so I am rooting for you ZOS. Please don't let us down.
https://youtu.be/GKLMeQLQYi0
I also wonder if these improvements will improve "balance" changes that were done for the sake of performance:
- Dots ticking twice as slower than before
- "Trap" duration reduced to 15 second
- CP change cooldown
And possibly other that I can't think of right now.
Murky_Dregs wrote: »It's long past time that you upgrade your architecture. It's good to hear that plans are finally in work.
I've run many program, project, & development teams in my career ($600m+portfolio), and the offhand comments made by Rich's wife speak volumes regarding the mindset of the ZoS team.
Her remarks were incredibly candid and are definitely a real glimpse into how your people feel.
Given the glib customer disregard displayed, how do you plan to address that issue, meaning your team's professional resolve regarding the matter, in order to ensure delivery of the quality product that many of us pay well over hundreds of dollars a year for and deserve?
Murky_Dregs wrote: »It's long past time that you upgrade your architecture. It's good to hear that plans are finally in work.
I've run many program, project, & development teams in my career ($600m+portfolio), and the offhand comments made by Rich's wife speak volumes regarding the mindset of the ZoS team.
Her remarks were incredibly candid and are definitely a real glimpse into how your people feel.
Given the glib customer disregard displayed, how do you plan to address that issue, meaning your team's professional resolve regarding the matter, in order to ensure delivery of the quality product that many of us pay well over hundreds of dollars a year for and deserve?
Whats this about? The part that includes richs wife and all that? I was absent for a long time, so im wondering what this is.
BlossomDead wrote: »So should all PvPers cancel subs for the foreseeable next 2 years or so? This announcement tells me I shouldn't get my hopes high for an unacceptable amount of time. With the state of PvP now, it really means I'm expected to accept being unable to play for years more.
Software development is not that complicated as you make it sound. Maybe this statement would work with a clueless upper management, but certainly not with a community already waiting for years for significant fixes.
IMHO your priority should be this, and only this. Hire more people if you need to. Everything else is irrelevant.
This to me is only PR damage control.
BlossomDead wrote: »So should all PvPers cancel subs for the foreseeable next 2 years or so? This announcement tells me I shouldn't get my hopes high for an unacceptable amount of time. With the state of PvP now, it really means I'm expected to accept being unable to play for years more.
Software development is not that complicated as you make it sound. Maybe this statement would work with a clueless upper management, but certainly not with a community already waiting for years for significant fixes.
IMHO your priority should be this, and only this. Hire more people if you need to. Everything else is irrelevant.
This to me is only PR damage control.
[snip] Also, keep in mind the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of players care more about PVE and questing, the PVP community is a significant minority in the game. Sure some players do both, but if you've been playing ESO for as many years as I have- you'd know what I say is true. [snip]
[Edited for Baiting]
AJones43865 wrote: »BlossomDead wrote: »So should all PvPers cancel subs for the foreseeable next 2 years or so? This announcement tells me I shouldn't get my hopes high for an unacceptable amount of time. With the state of PvP now, it really means I'm expected to accept being unable to play for years more.
Software development is not that complicated as you make it sound. Maybe this statement would work with a clueless upper management, but certainly not with a community already waiting for years for significant fixes.
IMHO your priority should be this, and only this. Hire more people if you need to. Everything else is irrelevant.
This to me is only PR damage control.
[snip] Also, keep in mind the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of players care more about PVE and questing, the PVP community is a significant minority in the game. Sure some players do both, but if you've been playing ESO for as many years as I have- you'd know what I say is true. [snip]
[Edited for Baiting]
You are plainly wrong. Every PvP player has done the vast majority if not all of the PvE in the game. Most PvP players spend far more on the game than a casual PvE player does. PvP is PvE+ a ton more time and money investment is how it works out in the real world.