Maybe I'm just not well-acquainted enough with this stuff as someone who doesn't RP in the way that people who RP mean RP, but wouldn't Lore/Culture just sort of be lumped together with Role-Playing?
I make my characters the race they are because... well, it fits the character idea I'm trying to make. Is that RP, or is that me following lore? What's the difference, especially if I'm "making my own lore"? If my Bosmer is an archer, and my Orc is a warrior, but my Altmer is a sword master, then how would you classify that?
Either way, it's seldom about aligning with the meta or popularity for me; and I think all races/sexes can be made attractive and/or aesthetically interesting. So I guess I'm in one of those two other categories. I'm interested to hear what the difference is now, honestly.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Other: a character pops into my mind fully formed including name, race, and backstory and then I go make that character in the game. The only races that never happen are orcs and argonians.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Other: a character pops into my mind fully formed including name, race, and backstory and then I go make that character in the game. The only races that never happen are orcs and argonians.
All my 5 characters are Dunmers because I find them the most interesting and really well developed race in TES lore, and ESO Dunmers look much more cute than Bethesda's monsters.
I think that the majority of players choosing aesthetics/lore are (un)consciously attracted to characters similar to them... E.g. I main an Imperial bc I am Mediterranean and my char looks the closest to me an ESO character can look... I think this would also explain the tremendous Breton popularity, because most playerbase is North-European somehow.