i vote proc, as the rest require actual player input to still make work.
proc sets require the least amount of player input to make work, thus they carry the hardest of the options.
though most proc build run malacath. . .but its the cherry on top.
mikey_reach wrote: »i vote proc, as the rest require actual player input to still make work.
proc sets require the least amount of player input to make work, thus they carry the hardest of the options.
though most proc build run malacath. . .but its the cherry on top.
I agree malacath can be but isn’t always top contender i place it of course for the sake of the argument my vote went for ww be because it can even make the less skilled of players unkillable and sometimes better be because its easier to only have one bar and be op than to have two bars and be op.The fact that you can die easier with a normal build with procs than with a ww at least from what ive seen is why my vote went for ww. It is fun to use though.
Recapitated wrote: »mikey_reach wrote: »i vote proc, as the rest require actual player input to still make work.
proc sets require the least amount of player input to make work, thus they carry the hardest of the options.
though most proc build run malacath. . .but its the cherry on top.
I agree malacath can be but isn’t always top contender i place it of course for the sake of the argument my vote went for ww be because it can even make the less skilled of players unkillable and sometimes better be because its easier to only have one bar and be op than to have two bars and be op.The fact that you can die easier with a normal build with procs than with a ww at least from what ive seen is why my vote went for ww. It is fun to use though.
A bad player on werewolf who can't turn that survivability into kills isn't getting carried anywhere, as it were. With procs you can actually punch above your weight.
Werewulf with malacath and procsets
im guessing dw is op with malacath and fossilize because of the extra 15% damage done with dw passive. Or it procs dolymesh a lot easier with what he said you can pretty much piece it together with research.
mikey_reach wrote: »im guessing dw is op with malacath and fossilize because of the extra 15% damage done with dw passive. Or it procs dolymesh a lot easier with what he said you can pretty much piece it together with research.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nothing wrong with non-dmg proc sets
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Dizzy Swing spam is flying under the radar evidently ...
mikey_reach wrote: »Werewulf with malacath and procsetsim guessing dw is op with malacath and fossilize because of the extra 15% damage done with dw passive. Or it procs dolymesh a lot easier with what he said you can pretty much piece it together with research.
No one is ready for the vatshran 2H + dolymish + malacath + explosive rebuke, petrify, DW stamDk
Urzigurumash wrote: »No one is ready for the vatshran 2H + dolymish + malacath + explosive rebuke, petrify, DW stamDk
Sure I'll try this out once it hits Xbox, and maybe it will be OP in Cyro/IC, but in Xbox NA BGs, Doyle isn't a guaranteed proc even on a valid target (I've used it in many hundreds of BGs). Explosive Rebuke certainly sounds OP for BGs, but I'm not sold on the 2h yet - stack sets tend to be weak in BGs since you (usually) lose the stacks if you die. Granted on paper it sounds easy enough to hit max stacks before death.
You want me to put skill and experience on the poll? How does that work skill and experience carries skill and experience?Goregrinder wrote: »That's a loaded poll if I ever saw it lol, skill and experience isn't even on the list.
mikey_reach wrote: »You want me to put skill and experience on the poll? How does that work skill and experience carries skill and experience?Goregrinder wrote: »That's a loaded poll if I ever saw it lol, skill and experience isn't even on the list.
Recapitated wrote: »mikey_reach wrote: »You want me to put skill and experience on the poll? How does that work skill and experience carries skill and experience?Goregrinder wrote: »That's a loaded poll if I ever saw it lol, skill and experience isn't even on the list.
Being good at the game is a huge carry dude
mikey_reach wrote: »Recapitated wrote: »mikey_reach wrote: »You want me to put skill and experience on the poll? How does that work skill and experience carries skill and experience?Goregrinder wrote: »That's a loaded poll if I ever saw it lol, skill and experience isn't even on the list.
Being good at the game is a huge carry dude
I dont think that is how you use the term “carry”. You are good then you are good you arent using anything to carry you. Your own skill and experience doesnt not carry you it can carry someone else but not yourself.
Recapitated wrote: »mikey_reach wrote: »Recapitated wrote: »mikey_reach wrote: »You want me to put skill and experience on the poll? How does that work skill and experience carries skill and experience?Goregrinder wrote: »That's a loaded poll if I ever saw it lol, skill and experience isn't even on the list.
Being good at the game is a huge carry dude
I dont think that is how you use the term “carry”. You are good then you are good you arent using anything to carry you. Your own skill and experience doesnt not carry you it can carry someone else but not yourself.
No that's totally a carry. A carry is when a bad player punches above their weight because of some advantage they have access to, like you put proc sets on a bad player and they suddenly do great. Take a player who's bad, now make them good, bam, carried. It's clearly the exact same thing.