Dusk_Coven wrote: »If people continue to hide behind excuses to allow humiliating another player with T-bagging, then the final recourse should be that they prove they didn't do it when they are reported.
This puts the onus on players to avoid the behavior completely.
Once or twice maybe they'll let you get away with "it was an accident / incidental". Too many times and you should be permanently banned because it starts to show a pattern of trying to get around the TOS.
Same with pets blocking stations. If it's there too long, don't care whether it was intentional or not. Just give them a suspension so they'll be careful next time by putting away their pet proactively.
I saw you t-bag someone and I can get 3 people to also say the same thing. Now prove you didn't.
What part of "M" rating do you guys not understand? If you care about a pretend bagging if you win a fight, then you are certainly in the wrong game. Perhaps you should try Pokémon!
If people continue to hide behind excuses to allow humiliating another player with T-bagging, then the final recourse should be that they prove they didn't do it when they are reported.
Welcome to the witch hunt culture.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »What part of "M" rating do you guys not understand? If you care about a pretend bagging if you win a fight, then you are certainly in the wrong game. Perhaps you should try Pokémon!
M = Mature.
People engaging in t-bagging or defending vulgar acts do not have sufficient maturity to qualify.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »What part of "M" rating do you guys not understand? If you care about a pretend bagging if you win a fight, then you are certainly in the wrong game. Perhaps you should try Pokémon!
M = Mature.
People engaging in t-bagging or defending vulgar acts do not have sufficient maturity to qualify.
Soul_Demon wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Soul_Demon wrote: »[snip]
Ask Google or Wikipedia. It's all very well documented.
Any picture or link or text description of the sort will be deleted here.
There is not the slightest doubt as to what T-bagging means, is and simulates.
Here's one of the sources I looked at dealing with the history of teabagging. It covers it both as an sexual act AND as a gaming taunt.
[snip]
Because I do think that these arguments tend to struggle over the fact that its both.
It came from and symbolizes a sexual act.
Its also been a fairly universal PVP taunt for nearly 20 years, even to the point that some Devs want emotes for it in their games.
Now, we can argue back and forth whether its a bad/fine thing that 20 years of PVP gaming has made teabagging commonplace even in games marketed to teens, but that doesn't really change the fact that it has become so, and thus desensitized to a lot of PVP players.
So I see problems on both sides with recognizing context.
The "it's just PVP side" needs to acknowledge the sexual history/nature of the gesture.
And the "it's just sexual assault" side needs to acknowledge the context within PVP gaming.
And ZOS needs to get off the fence. "Its fine until someone gets offended" type enforcement protects no one.
Varanis, you are a married woman. Stop for one second and consider the mechanics of standing, then crouch over someones head, then walk off.....exactly what sexual act does that compare to? You already know the answer. The people who claim this in fact does relate to some specific act they encounter on a regular basis- need therapy and likely are extremely 'pent up' based on the mechanics alone.......
These ridiculous definitions a person can find on the net as well as people simply repeating over an over there is an act of some sort that translates to the normal sexual encounters a person has is absolutely ridiculous and smacks of some desperate basement dwellers reaching for something to be offend about. Its like using Wiki as a source or slang definitions to 'prove' your case.....its something most avoid at all costs. You well know my opinion on this specific issue----but letting someone make up a false reasoning as to why someone does this and then propagate it while making false claims is just a bad idea. There is no end to lies paraded as facts when you let the first one slide for want of less resistance and to take the easier path.
Khaleesi8688 wrote: »Not only that but then cutting off friends you got along with for such a trivial thing? I often wonder what life is like for people who have to look for and invent problems instead of having to deal with real ones. I appreciate the insight I suppose. If it is that easy for someone to feel victimized in such a traumatic way, mmo games and the internet in general is probably never going to be a safe place for them.
VaranisArano wrote: »Soul_Demon wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Soul_Demon wrote: »[snip]
Ask Google or Wikipedia. It's all very well documented.
Any picture or link or text description of the sort will be deleted here.
There is not the slightest doubt as to what T-bagging means, is and simulates.
Here's one of the sources I looked at dealing with the history of teabagging. It covers it both as an sexual act AND as a gaming taunt.
[snip]
Because I do think that these arguments tend to struggle over the fact that its both.
It came from and symbolizes a sexual act.
Its also been a fairly universal PVP taunt for nearly 20 years, even to the point that some Devs want emotes for it in their games.
Now, we can argue back and forth whether its a bad/fine thing that 20 years of PVP gaming has made teabagging commonplace even in games marketed to teens, but that doesn't really change the fact that it has become so, and thus desensitized to a lot of PVP players.
So I see problems on both sides with recognizing context.
The "it's just PVP side" needs to acknowledge the sexual history/nature of the gesture.
And the "it's just sexual assault" side needs to acknowledge the context within PVP gaming.
And ZOS needs to get off the fence. "Its fine until someone gets offended" type enforcement protects no one.
Varanis, you are a married woman. Stop for one second and consider the mechanics of standing, then crouch over someones head, then walk off.....exactly what sexual act does that compare to? You already know the answer. The people who claim this in fact does relate to some specific act they encounter on a regular basis- need therapy and likely are extremely 'pent up' based on the mechanics alone.......
These ridiculous definitions a person can find on the net as well as people simply repeating over an over there is an act of some sort that translates to the normal sexual encounters a person has is absolutely ridiculous and smacks of some desperate basement dwellers reaching for something to be offend about. Its like using Wiki as a source or slang definitions to 'prove' your case.....its something most avoid at all costs. You well know my opinion on this specific issue----but letting someone make up a false reasoning as to why someone does this and then propagate it while making false claims is just a bad idea. There is no end to lies paraded as facts when you let the first one slide for want of less resistance and to take the easier path.
Truth be told, it was the very unsubstantiated definitions of teabagging you mention that made me go looking up the history of it. I found several articles that took a balanced approach to its origins referencing the sexual act in a John Waters film and the use of teabagging as a gamer taunt shortly after as games like Quake 2 introduced real crouch mechanics.
I wish I could link my sources, but since the last link got snipped, I think discretion is the better part of valor.
Mods, the linkless versions of my most useful sources are under the spoiler. If these are still a problem, please remove them."Everything You Never Wanted To Know About Teabagging In Video Games" by Whitney Meers on THEGAMER
"How a Simple Video Game Mechanics Became ESports' Most Controversial Insult" by Danny Paez on Inverse
"The Ups And Downs Of Teabagging In Pro Gaming" by Maddy Myers on Kotaku
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Khaleesi8688 wrote: »Not only that but then cutting off friends you got along with for such a trivial thing? I often wonder what life is like for people who have to look for and invent problems instead of having to deal with real ones. I appreciate the insight I suppose. If it is that easy for someone to feel victimized in such a traumatic way, mmo games and the internet in general is probably never going to be a safe place for them.
It has nothing to do with feeling safe or unsafe, nor with being a victim or not.
It has everything to do with what T-bagging says about the person who does it.
Imagine you're out in the woods with a friend and you drink a bottle of Coke. Then this friend throws the bottle away and leaves it in the woods.
This person will not remain my friend. No way.
Same goes with T-bagging in ESO.
It is so easy to take offense at every little thing.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »Dusk_Coven wrote: »If people continue to hide behind excuses to allow humiliating another player with T-bagging, then the final recourse should be that they prove they didn't do it when they are reported.
This puts the onus on players to avoid the behavior completely.
Once or twice maybe they'll let you get away with "it was an accident / incidental". Too many times and you should be permanently banned because it starts to show a pattern of trying to get around the TOS.
Same with pets blocking stations. If it's there too long, don't care whether it was intentional or not. Just give them a suspension so they'll be careful next time by putting away their pet proactively.
I saw you t-bag someone and I can get 3 people to also say the same thing. Now prove you didn't.
Screenshot? Video? If you don't even have a screenshot, you don't even have a report to begin with. How about you use some common sense? People defending teabagging seem to have a severe lack of that.
If you have a video or screen that they can look at, and if it looks like you are teabagging, then you are teabagging.
Too many warnings and you get a suspension since by that point it's likely you are doing it on purpose.
Don't care if you personally think it's teabagging or not, or if you personally intended it or not, or whatever. If they see your toon doing it, that's all they should need to take action.
Seriously... all these people who t-bagged now are so scared shitless that they will be banned retroactively. And they'll say anything to make this go away. Same as with every cheat or exploit that shows up on the forums.
How about they just not accept the TOS to begin with because they obviously don't agree with it.
If you don't think it's against TOS, don't bother arguing here. Just go ahead and do it and get reported. If you think it's completely innocent, you have nothing to worry about if ZOS is reasonable, right?
Soul_Demon wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Soul_Demon wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Soul_Demon wrote: »I have some quite serious concerns about you and of anyone who would claim this is fact and furthermore would love to know what the specific act is you think this simulates specifically.
Ask Google or Wikipedia. It's all very well documented.
Any picture or link or text description of the sort will be deleted here.
There is not the slightest doubt as to what T-bagging means, is and simulates.
Here's one of the sources I looked at dealing with the history of teabagging. It covers it both as an sexual act AND as a gaming taunt.
[snip]
Because I do think that these arguments tend to struggle over the fact that its both.
It came from and symbolizes a sexual act.
Its also been a fairly universal PVP taunt for nearly 20 years, even to the point that some Devs want emotes for it in their games.
Now, we can argue back and forth whether its a bad/fine thing that 20 years of PVP gaming has made teabagging commonplace even in games marketed to teens, but that doesn't really change the fact that it has become so, and thus desensitized to a lot of PVP players.
So I see problems on both sides with recognizing context.
The "it's just PVP side" needs to acknowledge the sexual history/nature of the gesture.
And the "it's just sexual assault" side needs to acknowledge the context within PVP gaming.
And ZOS needs to get off the fence. "Its fine until someone gets offended" type enforcement protects no one.
Varanis, you are a married woman. Stop for one second and consider the mechanics of standing, then crouch over someones head, then walk off.....exactly what sexual act does that compare to? You already know the answer. The people who claim this in fact does relate to some specific act they encounter on a regular basis- need therapy and likely are extremely 'pent up' based on the mechanics alone.......
These ridiculous definitions a person can find on the net as well as people simply repeating over an over there is an act of some sort that translates to the normal sexual encounters a person has is absolutely ridiculous and smacks of some desperate basement dwellers reaching for something to be offend about. Its like using Wiki as a source or slang definitions to 'prove' your case.....its something most avoid at all costs. You well know my opinion on this specific issue----but letting someone make up a false reasoning as to why someone does this and then propagate it while making false claims is just a bad idea. There is no end to lies paraded as facts when you let the first one slide for want of less resistance and to take the easier path.
Truth be told, it was the very unsubstantiated definitions of teabagging you mention that made me go looking up the history of it. I found several articles that took a balanced approach to its origins referencing the sexual act in a John Waters film and the use of teabagging as a gamer taunt shortly after as games like Quake 2 introduced real crouch mechanics.
I wish I could link my sources, but since the last link got snipped, I think discretion is the better part of valor.
Mods, the linkless versions of my most useful sources are under the spoiler. If these are still a problem, please remove them."Everything You Never Wanted To Know About Teabagging In Video Games" by Whitney Meers on THEGAMER
"How a Simple Video Game Mechanics Became ESports' Most Controversial Insult" by Danny Paez on Inverse
"The Ups And Downs Of Teabagging In Pro Gaming" by Maddy Myers on Kotaku
Ah
gotcha. Thought it was a bit different than I am used to with your posting, I see now it my misinterpretation of what you were suggesting
Dusk_Coven wrote: »Seriously... all these people who t-bagged now are so scared ******** that they will be banned retroactively. And they'll say anything to make this go away. Same as with every cheat or exploit that shows up on the forums.
ZOS_ConnorG wrote: »Greetings all,
After review we have had to edit or remove multiple posts for a variety of rule violations. Please keep in mind our Community Rules and Code of Conduct so that this thread remains civil, constructive, and within the rules. This will allow the discussion to continue and the thread to remain open.
You are welcome to review the Community Rules here and the Code of Conduct here.
ZOS_ConnorG wrote: »Greetings all,
After review we have had to edit or remove multiple posts for a variety of rule violations. Please keep in mind our Community Rules and Code of Conduct so that this thread remains civil, constructive, and within the rules. This will allow the discussion to continue and the thread to remain open.
You are welcome to review the Community Rules here and the Code of Conduct here.
@ZOS_ConnorG Okay, clearly y'all are reading this post, could you please, pretty please, just answer my question so people can quit using my "asking the devs a very simple yes or no question" thread to fight? I've lost enough faith in humanity already, thanks. Will you please just tell me in simple layperson's (not legalese) language whether teabagging is allowed or not?
Why can't you just not do it?
[Quoted post was removed]
I don't see it as a sexual act.
SilverBride wrote: »I don't see it as a sexual act.
By its definition, teabagging is a sexual act. Whether the person doing it sees it as a sexual doesn't matter. The act itself is sexual and that is what they are simulating. Their reason for teabagging doesn't change what it is.
Also, if the definition is too graphic to post on the forum, then the act is too graphic to perform in game.
SilverBride wrote: »
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Khaleesi8688 wrote: »Not only that but then cutting off friends you got along with for such a trivial thing? I often wonder what life is like for people who have to look for and invent problems instead of having to deal with real ones. I appreciate the insight I suppose. If it is that easy for someone to feel victimized in such a traumatic way, mmo games and the internet in general is probably never going to be a safe place for them.
It has nothing to do with feeling safe or unsafe, nor with being a victim or not.
It has everything to do with what T-bagging says about the person who does it.
Imagine you're out in the woods with a friend and you drink a bottle of Coke. Then this friend throws the bottle away and leaves it in the woods.
This person will not remain my friend. No way.
Same goes with T-bagging in ESO.
SilverBride wrote: »
If they don't ban people for cheating, why would they ban someone for something as petty as a tea-bag? So far, ZOS has remained silent on this, so that tells me that it isn't as big a deal as this forum is making it out to be.
SilverBride wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »
If they don't ban people for cheating, why would they ban someone for something as petty as a tea-bag? So far, ZOS has remained silent on this, so that tells me that it isn't as big a deal as this forum is making it out to be.
That's just speculation.