Biased poll. "Yes" gives me what I want, "No" denies other players what they want.
Seriously, why can't people just ask straight questions in polls? If they want to impress us with their biased opinion then express it in a comment, not in a poll.
Grianasteri wrote: »Biased poll. "Yes" gives me what I want, "No" denies other players what they want.
Seriously, why can't people just ask straight questions in polls? If they want to impress us with their biased opinion then express it in a comment, not in a poll.
True to an extent, but its also factually accurate and descriptive. Youd have more of a point if Id said, "No, I do not want other players to have more character slots available", but I didnt, players refers to both YOU, and other players. Its a catch all, because by saying no that is obviously what you are voting for - for neither you or anyone else to have more characters slots, and thats fine, each to their own.
So, take a chill pill, like, comment and subscribe!
darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »
Voting on your own poll kind of proves his point.
Grianasteri wrote: »darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »
Voting on your own poll kind of proves his point.
What on Earth are you on about, obviously Im going to vote on the poll, Its not like Ive hiden my opinion have I? What a fruit loop.
darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »Grianasteri wrote: »darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »
Voting on your own poll kind of proves his point.
What on Earth are you on about, obviously Im going to vote on the poll, Its not like Ive hiden my opinion have I? What a fruit loop.
Your large volume of needless exposition clearly laid out your bias for the world to see before you even got the the poll options.
Nordic__Knights wrote: »i for one have 18 maxed toons on ps4 and just started on pc so i have slots free for new builds but tbh even if i didnt only way id vote yes if they was free and only reason im not voting is because you asked for them to be paid for if an player has invested time and money to get 18 toons already they should get some free ones each chapter they order its that easy so again im an no vote due to asking that i pay for something i should already have opinions to use due to paying for each new chapter and buying all slots
Grianasteri wrote: »Nordic__Knights wrote: »i for one have 18 maxed toons on ps4 and just started on pc so i have slots free for new builds but tbh even if i didnt only way id vote yes if they was free and only reason im not voting is because you asked for them to be paid for if an player has invested time and money to get 18 toons already they should get some free ones each chapter they order its that easy so again im an no vote due to asking that i pay for something i should already have opinions to use due to paying for each new chapter and buying all slots
I didnt ask for anyone to pay, youv made that claim twice, incorrectly. I suggested that given ZOS is a business, that could be a component and that I personally, would be willing to pay. I also said that as a minimum, everyone should get additional free slots. In case it was not clear, I do not believe additional slots should be purchasable instead of free, but its ZOS were talking about so I am realistic. The salient point was, should there or should there not be additional slots available. The detail was just my opinions and thoughts.
Cheers
darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »Based on your own poll from last year, the overwhelming majority of players has substantially less than the current maximum. That's likely additional income from nearly 70% of players(based on your own poll). ZOS isn't going to hurt a potential revenue stream just because a statistical outlier like yourself writes a wall of text.
Grianasteri wrote: »darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »Based on your own poll from last year, the overwhelming majority of players has substantially less than the current maximum. That's likely additional income from nearly 70% of players(based on your own poll). ZOS isn't going to hurt a potential revenue stream just because a statistical outlier like yourself writes a wall of text.
30% of the community (with 15 or more characters, many of them likely with more now) represents a statistical outlayer? Where did you learn statistics like!
Other
No, but because the pototoes ZOS call servers are totally inadquate for handing the current numbers of characters so until more servers are added, it's a QOL needed NO!
darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »Grianasteri wrote: »darthgummibear_ESO wrote: »Based on your own poll from last year, the overwhelming majority of players has substantially less than the current maximum. That's likely additional income from nearly 70% of players(based on your own poll). ZOS isn't going to hurt a potential revenue stream just because a statistical outlier like yourself writes a wall of text.
30% of the community (with 15 or more characters, many of them likely with more now) represents a statistical outlayer? Where did you learn statistics like!
I said you were, not the 30%. [Snip.
[Edited for baiting]
Grianasteri wrote: »Yes, some folks start new accounts. Why should I have to? I have a quite ridiculous amount of time, effort, unlocks, dlcs and real world money invested in my account and I have no intention of starting another. Each to their own but no, it shouldnt be required.
I very much doubt that, considering they made character loading a specific performance plan improvement. "There are millions of accounts in our database. The goal of this task is to split the character database into “active” and “inactive” shards to remove the need to pool all the character records for all logins" https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/56681 It's clearly enough of a problem for ZOS to fix it- they're not gonna add more character slots to potentially make the problem worse.Grianasteri wrote: »Firstly its highly unlikely that the stored data from player characters has much if any effect on live server performance.
Grianasteri wrote: »Other
No, but because the pototoes ZOS call servers are totally inadquate for handing the current numbers of characters so until more servers are added, it's a QOL needed NO!
Why does every idea anyone makes ever, generally get trolled by folk screaming "but performance, fix that first!". Firstly its highly unlikely that the stored data from player characters has much if any effect on live server performance. Secondly, who cares, performance is not a factor when considering the simple question, "should folk have more character slots available".