I would like to also point out, once again, that my Nibenay Mudcrab was supposed to be "exclusive digital content" when I bought it as part of the Imperial Edition 70 months ago (at launch):
...and yet, when I returned, 29 months ago, I found it was available for anyone to buy, as a standalone pet, in the Crown Store.
I just assumed it would be a limited time offer and if it said "exclusive content", that is what it would be.
No one seems to know and/or care, at all, about that...
Not that I really care, either, because I'm not driven by pettiness and selfishness.
But, we're not allowed a tiger (even a different tiger), according to some people, even if we have subbed continuously for way more than 12 months, at this point?
Seems legit.
It was not "nigh untold garbage" and don't believe anyone who says it was.
It was buggy and it still is!
karthrag_inak wrote: »in other words, this one does not think that staying with the game during its bumpy birth eternally entitles someone to gate the rest of the community out of any content whatsoever. this viewpoint is irrational on many levels.
karthrag_inak wrote: »in other words, this one does not think that staying with the game during its bumpy birth eternally entitles someone to gate the rest of the community out of any content whatsoever. this viewpoint is irrational on many levels.
Irrational is clearly reading an item is a game exclusive in exchange for something done, yet throwing a fit because they don't break their word and hand it to you.
starkerealm wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »in other words, this one does not think that staying with the game during its bumpy birth eternally entitles someone to gate the rest of the community out of any content whatsoever. this viewpoint is irrational on many levels.
Irrational is clearly reading an item is a game exclusive in exchange for something done, yet throwing a fit because they don't break their word and hand it to you.
Talking about "irrational," we're not even talking about content. It's a cosmetic toy. It's not like you're gated from vMoL because you don't have that one specific mount.
starkerealm wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »in other words, this one does not think that staying with the game during its bumpy birth eternally entitles someone to gate the rest of the community out of any content whatsoever. this viewpoint is irrational on many levels.
Irrational is clearly reading an item is a game exclusive in exchange for something done, yet throwing a fit because they don't break their word and hand it to you.
Talking about "irrational," we're not even talking about content. It's a cosmetic toy. It's not like you're gated from vMoL because you don't have that one specific mount.
Dammit! And I thought I completed hard mode vMOL only thanks to my tiger mount!
This topic has taken a flight the past few days and I see a lot of people who say something like 'why deny us content? It must be selfishness.'
Those people actually want to deny veterans their ONLY mount to show they play from launch. This is unlimited arrogance and selfishness. MORE MORE MORE FOR ME (ME ME ME).
Get over it. The striped tiger senche is exclusive. There have been lots of other tiger-like mounts released into the game. Choose one of those.
(snip)
...and I'm still pissed off about how badly ZOS hosed up the cougar mount as well. I was really looking forward to the cougar, but then they put black socks on it for some stupid reason. Never in the history of the world has a cougar had black feet.