CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »My point is I think ZOS should take a lesson from Frontier, and improve upon it. Not only should the mount remain "exclusive" as some put it, but also, ZOS should really do what Frontier won't, and come in here and tell new players straight.
"You will not be given the opportunity to acquire this mount if you don't already qualify."
They need to say that. Then lock the thread. No debates, no pleads. GM has spoken.
karthrag_inak wrote: »
You know who used to do that? SOE. perhaps you don't know who they are - would not be surprised. They once had some of the biggest MMOs around, but they are gone now.
OP wanting a legit Tiger and telling them they can have any other Senche BUT the single one they want.
tigerborn62 wrote: »I was here in 2014, but I for some reason never got a tiger mount and never even knew of it at the time, now that I think about it. I hated this game so much in 2014 that I rarely played it. It wasn't until xbox release that I gave it a serious go. Oh well. Thems the brakes, I guess.
Nevertheless, I would still love one. I love tigers sooooo much.
CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »
Quick Google suggests Sony Online Entertainment? You're quite right, I do not know who they are and this is of course not your fault.
But the search did immediately lead to several MMO articles so I'm guessing they are who you mean?
Nemesis7884 wrote: »there is a tiger that was a loyalty reward a loooooooong time back - unfortunately it was already confirmed that it wont come back...
karthrag_inak wrote: »
the point being that they engaged in the behavior that you are suggesting. bolded above for easy reference. it led to their current state of non-being.
Yep, and I’d bet 95% of the players who got one are gone now.
No. The only platform that should see anything exclusive to it would be PC. ESO is a PC game.
Do you suffer from that often, then?
If you go back a couple of pages, you will see that I am asking for an Amur tiger mount - which I personally prefer, as I don't like the narrow face of the loyalty mount very much.
I am not asking for the loyalty mount to come back for me, personally.
Obviously, it would be easier for ZOS to not have to do a whole new model (so, I would have settled for that) and I am still for the idea, for people who would prefer the narrow-faced loyalty mount, but still.
No. The only platform that should see anything exclusive to it would be PC. ESO is a PC game. Accommodating console players is, arguably, what has led to a great deal of the bugs in this game.
emilyhyoyeon wrote: »The frustrating thing about the loyalty reward tiger is that it had to be what it is. Out of any mount that could've been the reward, it is a simple generic senche tiger. It's like making it a brown horse. Making something so generic so rare. It's just strange, and disappointing too if you don't like flashy mounts and like tigers. not white tigers, not black, not green, not glowing, not senche-raht, but just tigers
emilyhyoyeon wrote: »The frustrating thing about the loyalty reward tiger is that it had to be what it is. Out of any mount that could've been the reward, it is a simple generic senche tiger. It's like making it a brown horse. Making something so generic so rare. It's just strange, and disappointing too if you don't like flashy mounts and like tigers. not white tigers, not black, not green, not glowing, not senche-raht, but just tigers
It is odd that you call it generic yet it was the most unique mount in the game when Zos gave it to us. Further, some players were upset they could not get the mount because they took a few months off so Zos changed the requirements so months of sub paid ahead of the cutoff date would count. It is also a mount that has been the source of many threads of people requesting it like this thread.
So not so generic as it is considered special.
Yep, and I’d bet 95% of the players who got one are gone now.
MurderMostFoul wrote: »Xbox NA tiger lovers:
1000g for a 5 min viewing of my tiger!
Nope they are not. And i would be pretty annoyed if they break their promise.
BUT I can understand console players. Still, as they didnt support the game with sub before going b2p, they havent "earned" it. Some transfered and have it, but they supported the game during that time.
Accept, adapt, overcome.
If you miss an oppurtunity, happens, unlucky.
Making it accessable would be a slap to the face for old loyal supporters. Nogo.
MurderMostFoul wrote: »Xbox NA tiger lovers:
1000g for a 5 min viewing of my tiger!
but in all this time this was not that bad, hard as on beggining
we needed to struggle through this long time with very limited space for items than now,
we had limited options to use our mount, speed or for item capatiry, choose, now we dont need to choose between those stats
stamina buils literally doesnt exist in those days as for diversity of builds, the way we wanted to play
and I probably still missed some points not counting bugs....but ok
CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »I honestly think ZOS should shut this thread down.
Look guys, I've seen this debate before, and nobody wins.
Believe me, you need to look up the multitude of Cobra Mk IV threads on the Elite Dangerous forum. That ship in that game fulfils a similar reward to the tiger mount discussed here.
That one ship has on its own managed to cause a rift between new and old players that I just think cannot be repaired at this point.
Either Frontier gives everyone the ship and the vets start discussing matters of broken promises, and I distinctly remember one player threatening a legal case if "his" ship if given to new players. (It's a space sim. Believe me, those guys will spend a fortune on pixel ships) Or they don't give in. You'll get cries of unfairness but sticking to the status quo just doesn't hurt the company so is safer.
My point is I think ZOS should take a lesson from Frontier, and improve upon it. Not only should the mount remain "exclusive" as some put it, but also, ZOS should really do what Frontier won't, and come in here and tell new players straight.
"You will not be given the opportunity to acquire this mount if you don't already qualify."
They need to say that. Then lock the thread. No debates, no pleads. GM has spoken. Elite Dangerous is probably a prime example of the bad that happens when a dev' tries to include players too much. It does not end well. But then, Frontier Developments are the company who runs an MMO where some players have unobtainable gear that is more powerful then what new players can get, because old players literally cried.