twilightwarrick wrote: »Androconium wrote: »I'm old. Like over 40 old. I just dont do that ***.
im 54 what don't you do, undaunted, and yes to Happylittletree I know its a MMO but perhaps they could have an option
or missions that give you better gear for people, that don't know many players, and struggle to find groups,
to do the missions they want to do.
twilightwarrick wrote: »Him mm yes well I'm a bit fed up, as an older player, I don't really know many people playing and the few I do are usually offline, lately,
been trying to do a couple of undaunted missions to get some monster gear sets, well its almost impossible on my own,
and thinking about it most things in this game seen geared towards group play ,Alliance wars , Battlegrounds, dungeons undaunted.
really the only thing you can do as a single player are basic story missions, and the rewards are crap, I don't know,
I can join a group finder , but its usually not the missions I want to do, and if I post , nobody seems to do my quests, feel like its just a waste of time lately.
any advice would be welcome as how to solo some of these missions, I'm cp 290 night blade thanks
MornaBaine wrote: »
That's easy though: Bad marketing decisions and laziness. They realized they didn't want to go to the trouble of doing 4 zone DLCs a year. Frankly, I'm still saltly about this bait and switch.
2 big expansions on "chapter" scale with proper content would be much much better arrangement.
It can easily be a wolf. Or a fox. See how easily you can get fooled.
When Matt Frior is right he is right.
"Our bigger challenge has been to educate players that we are not a traditional 2004-style MMO and much more an expansive online Elder Scrolls RPG."
"MF: Again, we’re not really a traditional MMO, we are much more of a hybrid, kind of like an ‘online RPG’. The term MMO is freighted with a lot of pre-conceived notions, most of which are outdated and obsolete. But, no, of course we had no qualms about making an online Elder Scrolls game – we were following just two and a half years after one of the best-selling (and awesome) RPGs in history: Skyrim, which ignited huge interest in the Elder Scrolls as a brand."
ANd THAT is why ESO is not a MMO and why calling it a MMO is misleading/deceiving. It is Skyrim online no matter how much you want to disbelieve it. ANd it became Skyrim online when first iteration failed miserably and they had to rework the whole game (even before that they NEVER advertised it as a "MMO")
"ESO is not single player friendly"
does the definition of an MMORPG mean something else where you're from?