Mrslizardface wrote: »Mrslizardface wrote: »“For what they’re designed for.”
Yep.
What they’re designed for is the entirety of the game.
I personally have run vet trials with Xynode’s builds with no problem.
Nice try, though…
You could say that about anything, but in reality the group could be carrying you and you could be barely contributing, so saying you've done vet trials with xynode builds means nothing...
Nah. That’s the beauty of Combat Metrics. I can see what my actual real-world damage is while engaging mechanics, as well as my incoming and outgoing buffs and debuts.
Again, nice try...
Could you share? Since none of xynode builds show actual dps
saw his easy sorc build... You need:
Undaunted Infiltrator lightning staff
Undaunted Infiltrator 3 jewerly
you need 150 transmute crystals, cuz set is medium, so jewerly (or any other body armor parts) is robust (stamina)
you need vma lightning staff
easy sorc...
Mrslizardface wrote: »“For what they’re designed for.”
Yep.
What they’re designed for is the entirety of the game.
I personally have run vet trials with Xynode’s builds with no problem.
Nice try, though…
You could say that about anything, but in reality the group could be carrying you and you could be barely contributing, so saying you've done vet trials with xynode builds means nothing...
Nah. That’s the beauty of Combat Metrics. I can see what my actual real-world damage is while engaging mechanics, as well as my incoming and outgoing buffs and debuts.
Again, nice try...
Also I run with the Ninja Cakes guild on PC. We run almost all Xynode builds in all content.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But hey - meta orthodoxy says that’s impossible, so eh.
T3hasiangod wrote: »[snip]
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with his builds. For what they are built for, they're pretty decent. What I have issue with is the fact that many people who use these builds consider them as good as the meta builds, which is complete hogwash. Like please show me the parses that are getting within 1 percent of the meta builds. Meta is meta for a reason. Just because something can do DLC dungeons half-decently does not make it as good as the meta.
These same people are the ones who try to bring these builds into vet trials, not realizing the builds aren't good enough. Then we have to essentially reteach the meta to these same people, assuming they're receptive enough for feedback. Because a lot of them aren't and just complain on the forums about the elitism in end-game raiding, not realizing that they wouldn't be pulling their fair share.
So tl;dr Xynode builds are ok for what they were designed for, but his followers are the ones who elevate him and his builds to unrealistic expectations. [snip]
Off-meta is off-meta for a reason. If you have no intention on doing vet trials, then you do you. But don't you say that off-meta is within 1 percent of the meta and expect us to believe that without solid hard parses as evidence.
Some people are frightened by the notion that there isn't a single 'best in slot' build in ESO as there are in other games. Suggesting that other builds provide within 1% of the performance of the build they believe is best is a direct threat to the time they invested in collecting the items they believe to be best.
T3hasiangod wrote: »Also I run with the Ninja Cakes guild on PC. We run almost all Xynode builds in all content.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But hey - meta orthodoxy says that’s impossible, so eh.
Please show a video of your guild clearing vAS + 2, vMaw HM, vHoF HM, or vCR + 3 with all Xynode builds. I'll wait.
Now granted, Hodor can easily do that. They did finish vMaw HM with 300 CP, but thats because they have that experience. If you compare how quickly and easily they do it though, Xynode's will likely be significantly slower and less efficient.
Clearing a vet trial means almost nothing about the build itself, depending on the trial you're clearing. You can clear most of the vet Craglorn with an average of 20k DPS, with a tank that's only about beefiness and a healer that's just about pumping out HPS. Does that mean that group's set-up is meta or better than the meta? No, because the vet Craglorns are rediculously easy now due to power creep. In fact, many veteran raiders would consider vet Craglorns to be an introduction into end-game, not end-game proper.
saw his easy sorc build... You need:
Undaunted Infiltrator lightning staff
Undaunted Infiltrator 3 jewerly
you need 150 transmute crystals, cuz set is medium, so jewerly (or any other body armor parts) is robust (stamina)
you need vma lightning staff
easy sorc...
T3hasiangod wrote: »Please show a video of your guild clearing vAS + 2, vMaw HM, vHoF HM, or vCR + 3 with all Xynode builds. I'll wait.
lassitershawn wrote: »kathandira wrote: »kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
Very good point. Xynode tends to build on self sufficiency, Alcast and others (Dottz, etc) on group synergy and coordination. There is a place for both philisophies, and neither outweighs the other except for niche requirement.
Part of enjoying this game is exploring that, and the more voices the better.
100% Agreed.
Reading this has made me consider creating videos for fun builds for the bottom half of the player base. The Non-Vet Trials players. Fun stuff that is actually effective. Sort of a Deltia Revival. There are so many fun ways to build characters that can capitalize on their identity that i'd like to see more of it.
Should try making an ice build with winterborn, I've always wanted to see how fast you could get it to proc xD Warden with 2x ice dots, frost reach dot, asylum staff for the frost part of FP, frost glyph, ice blockade, ice light attacks, ice destro, iceheart, absolute crazy amount of chilled procs. I feel like you could probably get it to proc like once a second and maybe get 5k+ out of it, you'd sacrifice a lot of DPS elsewhere but it might be fun.
kylewwefan wrote: »With Rele, Ay, Veli Meta setup, I hit 52k. So uh yeah. %1 better.
Ah, the Far Eastern Deity. It was only a matter of time before you were summoned.
Would an entire guild team (Ninja Cakes, PS4-EU) with the vHOF skin suffice? The entire team made up of Xynode’s guildies? No? Probably not. They probably just carried each other.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ah, the Far Eastern Deity. It was only a matter of time before you were summoned.
Would an entire guild team (Ninja Cakes, PS4-EU) with the vHOF skin suffice? The entire team made up of Xynode’s guildies? No? Probably not. They probably just carried each other.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
kylewwefan wrote: »saw his easy sorc build... You need:
Undaunted Infiltrator lightning staff
Undaunted Infiltrator 3 jewerly
you need 150 transmute crystals, cuz set is medium, so jewerly (or any other body armor parts) is robust (stamina)
you need vma lightning staff
easy sorc...
Lol, I started working on this last night. Got the jewelry, but this lightning staff is about as legendary as BSW inferno! Thinking about going 2 light Grothdar and throwing in 2 medium underpants to try it out.
Agenericname wrote: »kylewwefan wrote: »saw his easy sorc build... You need:
Undaunted Infiltrator lightning staff
Undaunted Infiltrator 3 jewerly
you need 150 transmute crystals, cuz set is medium, so jewerly (or any other body armor parts) is robust (stamina)
you need vma lightning staff
easy sorc...
Lol, I started working on this last night. Got the jewelry, but this lightning staff is about as legendary as BSW inferno! Thinking about going 2 light Grothdar and throwing in 2 medium underpants to try it out.
I subbed elegance for undaunted infiltrator. Much easier to get and works pretty well.
MooseKnuckles88 wrote: »There's nothing wrong with not running meta builds, and to be honest if you're not trying for vet trial score runs then I don't see what the problem is.
T3hasiangod wrote: »[snip]
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with his builds. For what they are built for, they're pretty decent. What I have issue with is the fact that many people who use these builds consider them as good as the meta builds, which is complete hogwash. Like please show me the parses that are getting within 1 percent of the meta builds. Meta is meta for a reason. Just because something can do DLC dungeons half-decently does not make it as good as the meta.
These same people are the ones who try to bring these builds into vet trials, not realizing the builds aren't good enough. Then we have to essentially reteach the meta to these same people, assuming they're receptive enough for feedback. Because a lot of them aren't and just complain on the forums about the elitism in end-game raiding, not realizing that they wouldn't be pulling their fair share.
So tl;dr Xynode builds are ok for what they were designed for, but his followers are the ones who elevate him and his builds to unrealistic expectations. [snip]
Off-meta is off-meta for a reason. If you have no intention on doing vet trials, then you do you. But don't you say that off-meta is within 1 percent of the meta and expect us to believe that without solid hard parses as evidence.
[edited for non-constructive/baiting comments]
T3hasiangod wrote: »[snip]
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with his builds. For what they are built for, they're pretty decent. What I have issue with is the fact that many people who use these builds consider them as good as the meta builds, which is complete hogwash. Like please show me the parses that are getting within 1 percent of the meta builds. Meta is meta for a reason. Just because something can do DLC dungeons half-decently does not make it as good as the meta.
These same people are the ones who try to bring these builds into vet trials, not realizing the builds aren't good enough. Then we have to essentially reteach the meta to these same people, assuming they're receptive enough for feedback. Because a lot of them aren't and just complain on the forums about the elitism in end-game raiding, not realizing that they wouldn't be pulling their fair share.
So tl;dr Xynode builds are ok for what they were designed for, but his followers are the ones who elevate him and his builds to unrealistic expectations. [snip]
Off-meta is off-meta for a reason. If you have no intention on doing vet trials, then you do you. But don't you say that off-meta is within 1 percent of the meta and expect us to believe that without solid hard parses as evidence.
[edited for non-constructive/baiting comments]
Xynode: 31k subscribers
You: 8k subscribers
[snip].
I mean, his new DK hits 52k dps. How is that not good enough for vet trials, exactly?
[snip]
T3hasiangod wrote: »[snip]
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with his builds. For what they are built for, they're pretty decent. What I have issue with is the fact that many people who use these builds consider them as good as the meta builds, which is complete hogwash. Like please show me the parses that are getting within 1 percent of the meta builds. Meta is meta for a reason. Just because something can do DLC dungeons half-decently does not make it as good as the meta.
These same people are the ones who try to bring these builds into vet trials, not realizing the builds aren't good enough. Then we have to essentially reteach the meta to these same people, assuming they're receptive enough for feedback. Because a lot of them aren't and just complain on the forums about the elitism in end-game raiding, not realizing that they wouldn't be pulling their fair share.
So tl;dr Xynode builds are ok for what they were designed for, but his followers are the ones who elevate him and his builds to unrealistic expectations. [snip]
Off-meta is off-meta for a reason. If you have no intention on doing vet trials, then you do you. But don't you say that off-meta is within 1 percent of the meta and expect us to believe that without solid hard parses as evidence.
[edited for non-constructive/baiting comments]
Xynode: 31k subscribers
You: 8k subscribers
Now I get why you're so salty.
I mean, his new DK hits 52k dps. How is that not good enough for vet trials, exactly?
Pretty sad of you to feel like you have to come throw some shade on a appreciation post.
This is probably the least contructive comment in this entire thread, I don't see the points honestly, the two creators have entirely different audiences.
T3hasiangod wrote: »[snip]
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with his builds. For what they are built for, they're pretty decent. What I have issue with is the fact that many people who use these builds consider them as good as the meta builds, which is complete hogwash. Like please show me the parses that are getting within 1 percent of the meta builds. Meta is meta for a reason. Just because something can do DLC dungeons half-decently does not make it as good as the meta.
These same people are the ones who try to bring these builds into vet trials, not realizing the builds aren't good enough. Then we have to essentially reteach the meta to these same people, assuming they're receptive enough for feedback. Because a lot of them aren't and just complain on the forums about the elitism in end-game raiding, not realizing that they wouldn't be pulling their fair share.
So tl;dr Xynode builds are ok for what they were designed for, but his followers are the ones who elevate him and his builds to unrealistic expectations. [snip]
Off-meta is off-meta for a reason. If you have no intention on doing vet trials, then you do you. But don't you say that off-meta is within 1 percent of the meta and expect us to believe that without solid hard parses as evidence.
[edited for non-constructive/baiting comments]
It's sad to see a thread established to appreciate a content creator devolve into an argument over meta. It has become another example of the notorious elitism of a few vet trials players. Quite sad.
lassitershawn wrote: »Pretty much this post. When I was a new player myself I took some builds off the internet that were essentially advertised as BiS and were anything but. Being new to MMOs I just kind of naively assumed the content was accurate and later learned the hard way that it was not. Ofc I was willing to accept that another build was better and was willing to learn from actual endgame players, some people are not and just stupidly insist things like "IA on DPS" are BiS with no evidence to back it up (note that opinion and theorycrafting are in general not evidence). Same goes for a lot of players taking builds from popular websites.
On a side note, how does copying a build from a "meta-killer" (lol) website make you any more innovative or special than someone who copies their build from someone who is actually using a meta build. Like... lol? Can someone who fancies themselves anti-meta for any reason other than cool RP builds (full respect to those and those who advertise them as what they are) answer this for me?