Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
Some people are frightened by the notion that there isn't a single 'best in slot' build in ESO as there are in other games. Suggesting that other builds provide within 1% of the performance of the build they believe is best is a direct threat to the time they invested in collecting the items they believe to be best.
Peekachu99 wrote: »Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
It’s always easier to be a patronizing critic than it is to do it yourself. Props to Xynode and all the other content creators.
OMG everyone how have i only just seen this?
I was just shown this link by a friend. Completely humbled, thank you all so much!
OMG everyone how have i only just seen this?
I was just shown this link by a friend. Completely humbled, thank you all so much!
You know what will humble you even more? Don't forget to hit @iamdogman for PCEU carries.
@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Mrslizardface wrote: »Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
It's really not.. Even though he is one of the best Healers in the game, what he's saying is completely true. Xynode tells not to use IA and other good builds and when asked why not has no evidence to back it up. He just seems to have a hatred for anything considered meta
kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
Very good point. Xynode tends to build on self sufficiency, Alcast and others (Dottz, etc) on group synergy and coordination. There is a place for both philisophies, and neither outweighs the other except for niche requirement.
Part of enjoying this game is exploring that, and the more voices the better.
kathandira wrote: »kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
Very good point. Xynode tends to build on self sufficiency, Alcast and others (Dottz, etc) on group synergy and coordination. There is a place for both philisophies, and neither outweighs the other except for niche requirement.
Part of enjoying this game is exploring that, and the more voices the better.
100% Agreed.
Reading this has made me consider creating videos for fun builds for the bottom half of the player base. The Non-Vet Trials players. Fun stuff that is actually effective. Sort of a Deltia Revival. There are so many fun ways to build characters that can capitalize on their identity that i'd like to see more of it.
kathandira wrote: »kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
Very good point. Xynode tends to build on self sufficiency, Alcast and others (Dottz, etc) on group synergy and coordination. There is a place for both philisophies, and neither outweighs the other except for niche requirement.
Part of enjoying this game is exploring that, and the more voices the better.
100% Agreed.
Reading this has made me consider creating videos for fun builds for the bottom half of the player base. The Non-Vet Trials players. Fun stuff that is actually effective. Sort of a Deltia Revival. There are so many fun ways to build characters that can capitalize on their identity that i'd like to see more of it.
I weep for Deltia... Helped me so much in the early days.
I guess it's even easier to be a patronizing *** towards people who made a pretty valid comment.Peekachu99 wrote: »Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
It’s always easier to be a patronizing critic than it is to do it yourself. Props to Xynode and all the other content creators.
Oh, while you're here:OMG everyone how have i only just seen this?
I was just shown this link by a friend. Completely humbled, thank you all so much!
I guess it's even easier to be a patronizing *** towards people who made a pretty valid comment.Peekachu99 wrote: »Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
It’s always easier to be a patronizing critic than it is to do it yourself. Props to Xynode and all the other content creators.
I read through that comment quite a few times. It's not a terrible comment at all. You and that Aurielle are the ones being patronizing here.
Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials.
Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials.
Where is he telling people not to use IA or Lightning staves? Asking for a friend..
kathandira wrote: »ArchangelIsraphel wrote: »@ArchangelIsraphel xynode does tend to focus on class skills that provide identity to his builds, rather than weapon skills - - one of the things you'll hear him say or read in his notes quite often is that he chooses skills that give reason to play a specific class, or, indeed, play vampire for example. He picks sets that compliment that philosophy to achieve the best results. In many ways that is the very essence of what makes a xynode build, and how they can work within 1 or 2 % of the meta.
Agree or disagree, but in my experience console and pc play differently (player experience, responsiveness, qol). Certain classes (sorc, dk) I will pick a xynode build over an alcast build for that reason on xbox.
That's what I'm liking about everything I'm seeing. The classes actually feel unique. I'm thinking of respeccing my NB completely after seeing this because I'm just not having fun with his alcast build, and I feel like I could enjoy him more trying out Xynode's builds.
I've never played on Xbox, only on PC, but I think I'll enjoy it on PC just as much
Side note to fans of alcast builds that I'm not trying to insult alcast or anything- those guides have been useful to me as well. I just don't enjoy the style of gameplay I'm getting out of them at all and my mele characters feel really stagnant in terms of skills and animations. These look so much more dynamic. I might even pick up the DK I abandoned ages ago again.
Alcasts build seem to be built with the intention that the entire Trial group is creating their builds with complete synergy. They work best when everyone has the other team mates in mind when coordinating their builds. It is the Pro technique.
If I were in a scoreboard chasing guild, I would absolutely be using builds like his. But since my guild doesn't coordinate like that, I make builds with the assumption that I may not get all the buffs that I need to perform to my best ability. So in his build where he doesn't slot a certain buff, I do so I can at least be 100% sure I will be getting it.
To me, it seems that is the difference between the two build creators. They are built for different audiences.
Very good point. Xynode tends to build on self sufficiency, Alcast and others (Dottz, etc) on group synergy and coordination. There is a place for both philisophies, and neither outweighs the other except for niche requirement.
Part of enjoying this game is exploring that, and the more voices the better.
I don't know why anyone would be critical of others who contribute such effort in offering their ideas and opinions toward ESO builds, guides, and game play. I'm an Alcast follower too, but I think Xynode has done a fantastic job in offering some well thought-out and explained alternatives. His explanation and demonstration of the StamBlade rotation was enormously helpful to me. Props to him and all others who offer to help us out.
People running in organised trial groups know this who I assume you are.Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
Mrslizardface wrote: »Not a huge fan of his ideas around healing, he tells people not to use lightning staves or Infallible Aether, even though healers have shown both things are good. Most healers will have succes running IA even in normal trials. As for his dps builds, they're alright. Often they take a lot less effort to perfect and delivers enough damage to clear the sort of content they are made for. I would'nt really take him as a source for something even remotely meta or best in slot, but that does not seem to be what he is going for.. I consider it a positive that you can do builds like Xynode is and still have succes relative to the content you're doing, I would say most people would find more succes with his builds if they just want to have fun and do their daily pledges, than to straight up copy an Alcast trial build. I would'nt ever run one of his builds, but then again I would'nt run anything that is'nt best in slot.
What a patronizing response.
It's really not.. Even though he is one of the best Healers in the game, what he's saying is completely true. Xynode tells not to use IA and other good builds and when asked why not has no evidence to back it up. He just seems to have a hatred for anything considered meta