And this is were I stop playing ESO. Altho I've been waiting a long time for khajiiti lands to be implemented, even if this is a dragonbreak point of view on the timeline, for me it breaks to much lore.
Bethesda made a huge bust with fo76, and it seems tha they try to make up with a necromancer class wich doesnt make sense. Yes, everyone has asked for it, but implentation is troublesome to say the least.
1. Its banned by the magesguild, so how would a necromancer be allowed to join after mannimarco?
2. People are generally afraid of corpseraising, so how would questing go?
Huge problems indeed. And no, Dragons in this Era are not canon! Every TES fan with a shred of diginity would say the same.
Also the ongoing crownstore, while bugs from 2014 and onwards arent fixed is just downright sad.
If (and thats the biggest if so far in my life) they mamage to make our expectations true, I'll consider comming back, but so far to me this is a desperate move from a dying gamedeveloperstudio who used to be top notch, to keep their reputation and playerbase intact.
ESO_Nightingale wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
Not only lore, but all sanity.
I have mostly defended ESO's lore, as I find it enriching for the most part. But this update is clearly meant to please cows and whales. Because they have been asking for necromancy and Elsweyr since years and dragons would be a welcome nostalgia for them. I am fairly sure that true fans will find this rather questionable.
Yea. I guess I'll have to wait and see how they implement it all. By the wording alone, it doesn't look good.
I wouldn't mind too much if it was a necromancy skill line. Because 5 active abilities can hardly break immersion as much as 15 abilities can. But the very idea that they consider adding another class, where the last one was and still is a disaster and general class balance is still shocking......
I don't see how they plan to make 3 skill lines themed around necromancy that are distinct from other classes, especially Sorcerers. Wardens have been portrayed as a support class from the beginning, but I fail to see what the appeal of Necromancers is supposed to be outside of undead pets.
... They are going to be everywhere like Warden bears were in the beginning, won't they? Sigh.
Disease, Undead Magic and if they are a sload necromancer. water magic fits best.
Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
How did I miss this- I’d honestly love to be a Dremora wandering around nirnWildberryjack wrote: »Can we get a new race too? All we have now are four. Yes FOUR. All the Humans are just different ethnicities of the same race. All Elves are just different ethnicities of the same race. Honestly it makes for boring race choices when they mostly all look the same.
How about playable Daedra? Have some break off from Oblivion. Give them customization that includes demon and insect aspects to make them look less like a plain human variant.
Seraphayel wrote: »What strikes me is that
Dragons + Elsweyr + Necromancy
sounds so weird. I mean Dragons in Elsweyr? Why? Getting a tan or what? And then Necromancy?
Right now we lack almost every bit of information but it sounds like a really weird cocktail of ingredients to work in the end. I have to agree with @Dracane on this except for the Elsweyr part. Dragons and Necromancy very much sound like the most obvious choice to generate cash, just Skyrim as a new zone would have brought more to that table.
Hm. Now that we know what the next chapter is about, I see more connections with Murkmire, namely with the Honor Guard in Black Rose Prison. If we get to see Akaviri in Rimmen and elsewhere, maybe the yet unreleased Akaviri Honor Guard style will be available with the new chapter as well.
Callous2208 wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »What strikes me is that
Dragons + Elsweyr + Necromancy
sounds so weird. I mean Dragons in Elsweyr? Why? Getting a tan or what? And then Necromancy?
Right now we lack almost every bit of information but it sounds like a really weird cocktail of ingredients to work in the end. I have to agree with @Dracane on this except for the Elsweyr part. Dragons and Necromancy very much sound like the most obvious choice to generate cash, just Skyrim as a new zone would have brought more to that table.
I'm just gonna wait for more details. Hoping the "Dragons" part is very few dragons as end of quest or dungeon bosses. There just aren't that many dragons around at this time for a horde of dragons to make any sense. Also having them in Elsweyr seems really odd.
Building on this...alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
ESO is I believe set centuries before any of the previous games so if you think about it you can have dragons being way more common than the Skyrim Era.
ESO: 2E 583
Redguard: 2E864
Battlespire: 3E172
Arena: 3E399
Daggerfall: 3E405
Morrowind: 3E427
Oblivion: 3E433
Skyrim: 4E201
Quote from The Dragon War by Torhal Bjorik (lorebook found in Skyrim)
"The war was long and bloody. The dragon priests were overthrown and dragons were slaughtered in large numbers. The surviving dragons scattered, choosing to live in remote places away from men. The dragon cult itself adapted and survived. They built the dragon mounds, entombing the remains of dragons that fell in the war. They believed that one day the dragons would rise again and reward the faithful."
This was long before ESO but clearly Dragons, and their followers, still exist.
lordrichter wrote: »Building on this...alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
ESO is I believe set centuries before any of the previous games so if you think about it you can have dragons being way more common than the Skyrim Era.
ESO: 2E 583
Redguard: 2E864
Battlespire: 3E172
Arena: 3E399
Daggerfall: 3E405
Morrowind: 3E427
Oblivion: 3E433
Skyrim: 4E201
Quote from The Dragon War by Torhal Bjorik (lorebook found in Skyrim)
"The war was long and bloody. The dragon priests were overthrown and dragons were slaughtered in large numbers. The surviving dragons scattered, choosing to live in remote places away from men. The dragon cult itself adapted and survived. They built the dragon mounds, entombing the remains of dragons that fell in the war. They believed that one day the dragons would rise again and reward the faithful."
This was long before ESO but clearly Dragons, and their followers, still exist.
The dragons of Tamriel are gone through the culmination of events long before those of ESO, so the number of dragons flitting about from ESO through until Skyrim should be relatively stable and constant. ZOS is free to create a few named dragons that no one has ever heard of, or use any of the dragons we know are alive right now.
Of course, if there are dragons about, there are dragon born running around, too. Obviously, there are Dragonguard around, as well. They have to come from somewhere when Tiber Septim needs them.
I would not expect to find dragons, dragonborn, and Dragonguard under every rock in Elsewyr just because ZOS wants dragons. It is the first chapter in the arc, after all.
Probably the most exciting thing about this direction we are starting is that we might go to Akavir. There may still be dragons there. I doubt ZOS has the resources to mount a decent expedition to go there, but it is still an exciting thought.
RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Building on this...alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
ESO is I believe set centuries before any of the previous games so if you think about it you can have dragons being way more common than the Skyrim Era.
ESO: 2E 583
Redguard: 2E864
Battlespire: 3E172
Arena: 3E399
Daggerfall: 3E405
Morrowind: 3E427
Oblivion: 3E433
Skyrim: 4E201
Quote from The Dragon War by Torhal Bjorik (lorebook found in Skyrim)
"The war was long and bloody. The dragon priests were overthrown and dragons were slaughtered in large numbers. The surviving dragons scattered, choosing to live in remote places away from men. The dragon cult itself adapted and survived. They built the dragon mounds, entombing the remains of dragons that fell in the war. They believed that one day the dragons would rise again and reward the faithful."
This was long before ESO but clearly Dragons, and their followers, still exist.
The dragons of Tamriel are gone through the culmination of events long before those of ESO, so the number of dragons flitting about from ESO through until Skyrim should be relatively stable and constant. ZOS is free to create a few named dragons that no one has ever heard of, or use any of the dragons we know are alive right now.
Of course, if there are dragons about, there are dragon born running around, too. Obviously, there are Dragonguard around, as well. They have to come from somewhere when Tiber Septim needs them.
I would not expect to find dragons, dragonborn, and Dragonguard under every rock in Elsewyr just because ZOS wants dragons. It is the first chapter in the arc, after all.
Probably the most exciting thing about this direction we are starting is that we might go to Akavir. There may still be dragons there. I doubt ZOS has the resources to mount a decent expedition to go there, but it is still an exciting thought.
If this is the start of a new 3 year story arc involving Dragons then I would expect it to climax in Skyrim in 2021 for that 10 year anniversary. Just saying.
Callous2208 wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »What strikes me is that
Dragons + Elsweyr + Necromancy
sounds so weird. I mean Dragons in Elsweyr? Why? Getting a tan or what? And then Necromancy?
Right now we lack almost every bit of information but it sounds like a really weird cocktail of ingredients to work in the end. I have to agree with @Dracane on this except for the Elsweyr part. Dragons and Necromancy very much sound like the most obvious choice to generate cash, just Skyrim as a new zone would have brought more to that table.
I'm just gonna wait for more details. Hoping the "Dragons" part is very few dragons as end of quest or dungeon bosses. There just aren't that many dragons around at this time for a horde of dragons to make any sense. Also having them in Elsweyr seems really odd.
Callous2208 wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
Not only lore, but all sanity.
I have mostly defended ESO's lore, as I find it enriching for the most part. But this update is clearly meant to please cows and whales. Because they have been asking for necromancy and Elsweyr since years and dragons would be a welcome nostalgia for them. I am fairly sure that true fans will find this rather questionable.
Yea. I guess I'll have to wait and see how they implement it all. By the wording alone, it doesn't look good.
I wouldn't mind too much if it was a necromancy skill line. Because 5 active abilities can hardly break immersion as much as 15 abilities can. But the very idea that they consider adding another class, where the last one was and still is a disaster and general class balance is still shocking......
I don't see how they plan to make 3 skill lines themed around necromancy that are distinct from other classes, especially Sorcerers. Wardens have been portrayed as a support class from the beginning, but I fail to see what the appeal of Necromancers is supposed to be outside of undead pets.
... They are going to be everywhere like Warden bears were in the beginning, won't they? Sigh.
Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »What strikes me is that
Dragons + Elsweyr + Necromancy
sounds so weird. I mean Dragons in Elsweyr? Why? Getting a tan or what? And then Necromancy?
Right now we lack almost every bit of information but it sounds like a really weird cocktail of ingredients to work in the end. I have to agree with @Dracane on this except for the Elsweyr part. Dragons and Necromancy very much sound like the most obvious choice to generate cash, just Skyrim as a new zone would have brought more to that table.
I'm just gonna wait for more details. Hoping the "Dragons" part is very few dragons as end of quest or dungeon bosses. There just aren't that many dragons around at this time for a horde of dragons to make any sense. Also having them in Elsweyr seems really odd.
And thats why the lore never found them!
Who would think of seaching elsweyr for dragon?
And this is were I stop playing ESO. Altho I've been waiting a long time for khajiiti lands to be implemented, even if this is a dragonbreak point of view on the timeline, for me it breaks to much lore.
Bethesda made a huge bust with fo76, and it seems tha they try to make up with a necromancer class wich doesnt make sense. Yes, everyone has asked for it, but implentation is troublesome to say the least.
1. Its banned by the magesguild, so how would a necromancer be allowed to join after mannimarco?
2. People are generally afraid of corpseraising, so how would questing go?
Huge problems indeed. And no, Dragons in this Era are not canon! Every TES fan with a shred of diginity would say the same.
Also the ongoing crownstore, while bugs from 2014 and onwards arent fixed is just downright sad.
If (and thats the biggest if so far in my life) they mamage to make our expectations true, I'll consider comming back, but so far to me this is a desperate move from a dying gamedeveloperstudio who used to be top notch, to keep their reputation and playerbase intact.
Callous2208 wrote: »
It does seem a bit much. If their were no sorcerer in this game already, eh, I could maybe see it then. But not with the classes we have now. Just not enough there to make a full class. Could be wrong though.
I would love to see this skillline integrated in the current class/roles. Tanks with undeads? Nice.
Something we could have had with spellcrafting, but the call for a new class was apparently stronger.
I don't really see how this is a good decision on ZOS' part, a new class is useless to all of my existing 15 characters.
Yes, maybe they'll grant us a new char slot like they did with the Warden, but even so, it doesn't strike me as fun to have to abandon the characters you've played for years to experience new features.