Ye ok OP, I got 1070 or so CP`s, would have more but I cannot be bothered playing the game more than doing my daily writs on 14 chars at moment, but to go and get my CP`s back on every character?
Are you mad?
ZoS do not listen to this garbage proposal.
same as ZOS dont listen to garbage suggestion about toggle account bound achievs, skyshareds/skillpoints, guild levels etc
eveything new account share idea is garbage in opinion of most forum warriors
Salvas_Aren wrote: »
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
Ryath_Waylander wrote: »Why do they only have buttons for "insightful" awesome and agree and not for short sighted, horrible and hell no?
Thorstienn wrote: »I love how many ppl dont mean to get that this is a troll thread: the OP agrees with all of you and actually wants more of the game to be account bound.
However, instead of making so many threads just asking for the discussion, why not just make a few polls? Get your for and against, simple.
Good luck either way.
Sylvermynx wrote: »No one's mistaking anything about your stuff Edziu.
Sylvermynx wrote: »No one's mistaking anything about your stuff Edziu.
but they are if I try to explain more things at once which I would want if creating polls to make options clear
I remember I had some misunderstands in other day as or I bad explained with bad punctuation
Sylvermynx wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »No one's mistaking anything about your stuff Edziu.
but they are if I try to explain more things at once which I would want if creating polls to make options clear
I remember I had some misunderstands in other day as or I bad explained with bad punctuation
Apparently you're not getting that almost no one who's posted in your threads (ALL of them....) thinks any of your ideas are good. Period. That has nothing to do with your obvious inability to explain - and yes, I do understand that English is not your first language. It has to do with the fact that your wishes and ideas do not fit with the game at all - so of course that means that what most of us think is that you're simply playing the wrong game.
If you're virtually the only person wanting these extreme changes to the game, do you really think it's likely to happen?
What you don't seem to understand is that the stuff you're proposing is not logical at all in this game, because the TES franchise (which in a sort of sideways synergy includes ESO) has some serious background situational contingencies. Those aren't likely to change enough to give your oddball ideas any traction at all.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Edziu - this game is an MMO. It cannot run the way the single-player games do.
I think you're going to need to find another game to play while you wait for TES VI. And.... I also think that when (if) TES VI lands.... you're not going to be happy with it either.
You don't seem to.... change with the times. I almost think you must be older than I am. And I'll be 71 in a few days.
Fleshreaper wrote: »oooh boy! more logical fallacies and incoherent statements!
For those who don't understand, this is a troll thread, because their ideas in several other threads were roundly dismissed and disproved by literally hundreds of different people. So they are making the "opposite" argument in such an absurd way as to try and show that the other side is wrong/masochistic/etc...
Well, HAHAHAHA. "Roundly dismissed and disproved" That's a joke, right? Oh, you're serious? Well, hate to tell you, your opinion is not fact, it is just that, YOUR opinion. You say things should be based solely on character completion and then you turn right around and say, no, to character bound CP because it's too hard. So, in fact you think if something is okay for you to grind then everyone else should be okay with it. So, who is really the hypocrite?