VaranisArano wrote: »John_Falstaff wrote: »@Kanar , who's being selfish? Those three people - they chose random dungeon. They got MHK. Now they want to cheat, that means they lied about wanting a random. They want a box they did not earn (literally, by the letter of the event rules). It doesn't matter what they want now, if they decide they don't want MHK - they can quit, nobody prevents them. The only honest person among that group would be the one who picked MHK and wants to run it.
Lul no the one who refuses to change dungeons is a selfish little prick who needs to get over himself and his high horse. He deserves to be kicked. Dungeon finder is not a moral issue.
Moral or not, its pretty clear.
You don't want a Daily Random Dungeon.
You want a Daily Guaranteed Quick 'N Easy Dungeon and all the rewards with none of the risk.
John_Falstaff wrote: »@StormChaser3000 , why I'm forcing them to run CoA2? Simplest question: of course because they wanted that. They picked "random" and pressed button, signing up. They got CoA2 as their random, the dungeon they just declared they want and promise to run. They wanted randomness, they got it, and if they suddenly have change of heart - doesn't entitle them to anything. They can fulfill their obligation or bail, nobody holds them.
John_Falstaff wrote: »... if they seek excuses to sell their conscience for a motif or a pet.
John_Falstaff wrote: »@Kanar , you must be joking. ^^ The only person who wants to be honest and run the dungeon he signed up for ends up in the wrong. Something's up with community's moral compass if they seek excuses to sell their conscience for a motif or a pet.
Then again it's a nice feature in case you get a DLC dungeon. (Sometimes people queue for random vet afterall)
"Legally" still an exploit nontheless.
John_Falstaff wrote: »@Kanar , you must be joking. ^^ The only person who wants to be honest and run the dungeon he signed up for ends up in the wrong. Something's up with community's moral compass if they seek excuses to sell their conscience for a motif or a pet.
Yep that's right you are the one in the wrong. Here's an example: in my elementary school (many years ago) the teachers had a big tail shape cut out of construction paper. If any kid "tattled" on another kid, then the kid reporting (tattling) had to wear that big tattle tail as a punishment.
The moral is that no one likes tattle tails and they don't do anything beneficial; they just slow down the system with trivial complaints.
So yeah, you should be punished for being a tattle tail and stick-in-the-mud.
That doesn't mean smything. What moral compaas have those people who feel that a group MUST carry them whenever and wherever they want? It's not for you to tell them what to. If you can't live for 10 days a year without real random runs I believe there is something wrong with you and not them.John_Falstaff wrote: »@StormChaser3000 , no need, the drop-down list with word "random" is enough to express their desire and obligations. It's a moral contract they make. They don't intend to run it? They're liars and violate that moral compass and rules of the event, hence they're not entitled to rewards in either case.
John_Falstaff wrote: »@Riverlynn , you'll be surprised, I'm quite serious here. I firmly believe that morals root in small things, even in such small ones as being honest (and fair to others) in a game. In for a penny, in for a pound.
THE_BIG_BOSS wrote: »ITS an exploit and everyone abusing it should be banned
ITS RANDOM Dungeon Not fungal 1
John_Falstaff wrote: »@Kanar , you must be joking. ^^ The only person who wants to be honest and run the dungeon he signed up for ends up in the wrong. Something's up with community's moral compass if they seek excuses to sell their conscience for a motif or a pet.
Yep that's right you are the one in the wrong. Here's an example: in my elementary school (many years ago) the teachers had a big tail shape cut out of construction paper. If any kid "tattled" on another kid, then the kid reporting (tattling) had to wear that big tattle tail as a punishment.
The moral is that no one likes tattle tails and they don't do anything beneficial; they just slow down the system with trivial complaints.
So yeah, you should be punished for being a tattle tail and stick-in-the-mud.
VaranisArano wrote: »John_Falstaff wrote: »@Kanar , who's being selfish? Those three people - they chose random dungeon. They got MHK. Now they want to cheat, that means they lied about wanting a random. They want a box they did not earn (literally, by the letter of the event rules). It doesn't matter what they want now, if they decide they don't want MHK - they can quit, nobody prevents them. The only honest person among that group would be the one who picked MHK and wants to run it.
Lul no the one who refuses to change dungeons is a selfish little prick who needs to get over himself and his high horse. He deserves to be kicked. Dungeon finder is not a moral issue.
Moral or not, its pretty clear.
You don't want a Daily Random Dungeon.
You want a Daily Guaranteed Quick 'N Easy Dungeon and all the rewards with none of the risk.
John_Falstaff wrote: »@StormChaser3000 , "wherever"? I don't understand you. It's the dungeon all involved parties have agreed to run together by queueing up. If some of them suddenly had a change of heart - it's on them, they're the ones failing their party members (who honestly intend to run the random or what they signed up for). If those former ones feel entitled to reward box and demand it for only fifteen minutes of their time instead of random clear terms of event require - why, something's definitely wrong with them. ^^
protofeckless wrote: »Maybe an exploit, but also very near the very bottom of a very long list of higher priority issues. Let it go people.