Eventually I came back, but if it almost cost me everything.
Hoolielulu wrote: »Zeni gave a cost free alternative, but it requires a time commitment. Watch ESO Twitch streams, get crates, get garbage consumables and exchange them for gems, use gems to buy Apex Mount. Leave the stream on your device laying somewhere while you get things done around d the house, or run errands, or whatever. Do this a few times a week and you'll have more than enough gems to buy the mounts.
Except for those of us on console, you mean.
GUYS I JUST GOT A RADIANT APEX MOUNT!!!!11eleven!! BELIEVE ME IT WORKS. YOU JUST GOT UNLUCKY, BUT THE LOSING STREAK GOTTA END AT SOME POINT SO KEEP BUYINGGGGGGG!
Hippie4927 wrote: »AWWW you deserve it though Hippie! You're always the coolest to people!
Awww! Thank you!Noticed that most of the people with radiant apex are top players? Coincidence?
Coding in this game is bonkers let alone have them make a purest form of RNG that is equivalence to real luck. There would obviously be biased and favoritism within this system.
I am far from a top player! I'm not a streamer; I'm not on Twitch or Facebook or any of that; Zeni doesn't know who I am.GreenhaloX wrote: »Hippie4927 wrote: »Sorry for your bad luck, OP.
Tonight I bought only 15 crates and to my surprise.........
I have wanted that mount ever since I first saw it but wasn't willing to spend much trying to get it. Usually RNG hates me but tonight I got lucky.
AWWW you deserve it though Hippie! You're always the coolest to people!
Yeah.. oooh, sooo sweet. Good for you. @Hippie4927.
But, tell me.. how did you hacked it..? That's just awesome from one set of crown crates. Yup, somebody likes you.. ha ha
LOL! No hacking! I wasn't even thinking about that mount. I bought the crates hoping to get a couple of motif books that I needed and maybe a couple of other cool things. I was shocked when that mount came up.
TheDarkShadow wrote: »I know someone spent about 200 bucks on scalecaller crates (about 28k crown I guess) and still can't get the radiant mount.
GreenhaloX wrote: »GUYS I JUST GOT A RADIANT APEX MOUNT!!!!11eleven!! BELIEVE ME IT WORKS. YOU JUST GOT UNLUCKY, BUT THE LOSING STREAK GOTTA END AT SOME POINT SO KEEP BUYINGGGGGGG!
You sound like those that are paid to write good review/comments on a product, even though, they didn't actually bought the product. Are you paid the same by ZOS? Ha ha
Hippie4927 wrote: »@GreenhaloX
Grats on finally getting it! I hope you didn't have to spend TOO much to get it but glad that you did finally get one.
GreenhaloX wrote: »GUYS I JUST GOT A RADIANT APEX MOUNT!!!!11eleven!! BELIEVE ME IT WORKS. YOU JUST GOT UNLUCKY, BUT THE LOSING STREAK GOTTA END AT SOME POINT SO KEEP BUYINGGGGGGG!
You sound like those that are paid to write good review/comments on a product, even though, they didn't actually bought the product. Are you paid the same by ZOS? Ha ha
@GreenhaloX That's exactly what I was going for. The rarest things I got was a Psijic Camel from a free crate and a Scarlet remorse pet from a Twitch crate. The odds are garbage and the system is predatory. I only ever bought one crate and that was a calculated non-risk because whether I got the item or not didn't matter. I was guaranteed to get enough gems (16) to buy it afterwards.
Stay in school and don't do crates kids!
GreenhaloX wrote: »Before you call me an idiot and stick a kick me sign on my back.. I know, I know, but I really would like to get at least one, or two, of the Radiant Apex Award mounts from these current Scalecaller crates. That Galvanic Storm Steed, Dragonfire wolf and Shadow-Rider Senche look so cool. After 60 crates, not one ffing Radiant Apex reward. Only got one damn mount from the Apex reward; rest are all crap potions, poisons, scrolls and shitt repeatedly. WTF.. 60 ffing crates/ 20k crowns wasted. You would think we would have received at least 1 or 2 from the Radiant Apex and a few from the Apex; mounts specifically. I feel like (if I could) shove all these crates up somebody's arse over there in the Zen and ZOS land. Damn, this shitt needs rework and improved bad. . Had a thumb back up for the recent fix to the 2H reticle issue. Now this.. thumb is back down. Goodness..
IDK why people gamble then complain they didn't get Jackpot.
GreenhaloX wrote: »Before you call me an idiot and stick a kick me sign on my back.. I know, I know, but I really would like to get at least one, or two, of the Radiant Apex Award mounts from these current Scalecaller crates. That Galvanic Storm Steed, Dragonfire wolf and Shadow-Rider Senche look so cool. After 60 crates, not one ffing Radiant Apex reward. Only got one damn mount from the Apex reward; rest are all crap potions, poisons, scrolls and shitt repeatedly. WTF.. 60 ffing crates/ 20k crowns wasted. You would think we would have received at least 1 or 2 from the Radiant Apex and a few from the Apex; mounts specifically. I feel like (if I could) shove all these crates up somebody's arse over there in the Zen and ZOS land. Damn, this shitt needs rework and improved bad. . Had a thumb back up for the recent fix to the 2H reticle issue. Now this.. thumb is back down. Goodness..
menathradiel wrote: »The house always wins...
As someone who once worked in the counting room of a casino, I can attest to this truth. It's the reason why I never gamble. And at least casinos and arcades are regulated - crown crates... they can have any odds they like and they don't even have to tell you what they are. Any game's "loot boxes" always make me think of "mystery box" games, where you know it's gonna be filled with trash but somehow convince yourself there might be something really good inside because Mavis just won a bottle of whisky.
Elwendryll wrote: »Using the data from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n1kdrywYmgjx290QwGJj9TT1Y8z4GfEMhvQ8kQnKL5g/edit#gid=897651316
I did some math. A radiant apex reward has supposedly a chance of dropping roughly equal to 0.17% (Hollowjack season).
You can't guarantee a loot, however, you can get close to it.
According to my calculations, here are the number of crates required to get the associated chance to loot at least 1 radiant apex reward.
2707 crates: 99% chance of looting at least 1 radiant apex.
1354: 90%
815: 75%
408: 50%
170: 25%
As you can see, that's exactly like CP, you have diminishing returns
Bonus: I'm not at home an I don't have my calculator so that's handmade values, just a binomial law. 1-0.9983^x, x being the number of crates, should give you the odds of not getting nothing.
Elwendryll wrote: »Using the data from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n1kdrywYmgjx290QwGJj9TT1Y8z4GfEMhvQ8kQnKL5g/edit#gid=897651316
I did some math. A radiant apex reward has supposedly a chance of dropping roughly equal to 0.17% (Hollowjack season).
You can't guarantee a loot, however, you can get close to it.
According to my calculations, here are the number of crates required to get the associated chance to loot at least 1 radiant apex reward.
2707 crates: 99% chance of looting at least 1 radiant apex.
1354: 90%
815: 75%
408: 50%
170: 25%
As you can see, that's exactly like CP, you have diminishing returns
Bonus: I'm not at home an I don't have my calculator so that's handmade values, just a binomial law. 1-0.9983^x, x being the number of crates, should give you the odds of not getting nothing.
Sigh... your (and folks who posted before you) math is completely wrong. Each crate is a separate "event", so it doesn't matter how much crates you buy, you have exactly the same chance to get a mount every time you open the crate. The calculations you posted above would be correct, if the items you got from crates were removed from the pool - and obviously they are not, hence the "doubles". Statistically, you have the same chance to get a mount in two consecutive crates or get none in 2000.
Let me write it once more: you have EXACTLY THE SAME CHANCE to get the item you want EVERY TIME YOU OPEN THE CRATE! It doesn't cumulate! That's the trick, most people don't realise that and they buy hundreds of crates hoping that their chances increase with every crate, but it does not.
Source: I used to do a lot of statistics in my research. If you don't believe me, google it. Or be a clueless sheep, I don't care.
Elwendryll wrote: »Using the data from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n1kdrywYmgjx290QwGJj9TT1Y8z4GfEMhvQ8kQnKL5g/edit#gid=897651316
I did some math. A radiant apex reward has supposedly a chance of dropping roughly equal to 0.17% (Hollowjack season).
You can't guarantee a loot, however, you can get close to it.
According to my calculations, here are the number of crates required to get the associated chance to loot at least 1 radiant apex reward.
2707 crates: 99% chance of looting at least 1 radiant apex.
1354: 90%
815: 75%
408: 50%
170: 25%
As you can see, that's exactly like CP, you have diminishing returns
Bonus: I'm not at home an I don't have my calculator so that's handmade values, just a binomial law. 1-0.9983^x, x being the number of crates, should give you the odds of not getting nothing.
Sigh... your (and folks who posted before you) math is completely wrong. Each crate is a separate "event", so it doesn't matter how much crates you buy, you have exactly the same chance to get a mount every time you open the crate. The calculations you posted above would be correct, if the items you got from crates were removed from the pool - and obviously they are not, hence the "doubles". Statistically, you have the same chance to get a mount in two consecutive crates or get none in 2000.
Let me write it once more: you have EXACTLY THE SAME CHANCE to get the item you want EVERY TIME YOU OPEN THE CRATE! It doesn't cumulate! That's the trick, most people don't realise that and they buy hundreds of crates hoping that their chances increase with every crate, but it does not.
Source: I used to do a lot of statistics in my research. If you don't believe me, google it. Or be a clueless sheep, I don't care.
I can understand why you used to do a lot of statistics.
I can't understand why if you did do a loto statistics, you never heard of Bernouilli trials or binomial distributions.
You have 0.15% to get an Apex Radiant mount for each trial, but you don't have 0.15% chance to get a mount after nth trials.
What's at hand here is the calculation of a probability of success after a given number of trials in the case of independent events with given odds.
What are the chances you roll a 6? 0.1667.
What are the chances you roll a 6 after 3 trials?
If you believe it's 0.16667, YOU are the clueless sheep.
Good luck with your research.
Agreed...Nothing should be Locked behind potential RNG...everything should eventually be possible to purchase through Gem collectionsI grumble about the RNG when I get free crates, and in the few crates I've bought to get gems to buy what I want, but my real rancor is toward them not making Radiant Apex mounts purchasable through gems. They have no idea how many effing crates I would have bought to get that purple psijic steed with gems, as it was the most perfect mount for my main that they've ever made, and I was really distressed that they left that one up to luck, which I lack completely. Gems I could have *bought*, even if it was a handful at a time. Luck I can't buy and will never have. No amount of temptation will make me believe that I'm going to win something, so I give up immediately if it's not purchasable and they missed out on a ton of dumb purchases from me getting gems piled up to grab that thing.
Elwendryll wrote: »Elwendryll wrote: »Using the data from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n1kdrywYmgjx290QwGJj9TT1Y8z4GfEMhvQ8kQnKL5g/edit#gid=897651316
I did some math. A radiant apex reward has supposedly a chance of dropping roughly equal to 0.17% (Hollowjack season).
You can't guarantee a loot, however, you can get close to it.
According to my calculations, here are the number of crates required to get the associated chance to loot at least 1 radiant apex reward.
2707 crates: 99% chance of looting at least 1 radiant apex.
1354: 90%
815: 75%
408: 50%
170: 25%
As you can see, that's exactly like CP, you have diminishing returns
Bonus: I'm not at home an I don't have my calculator so that's handmade values, just a binomial law. 1-0.9983^x, x being the number of crates, should give you the odds of not getting nothing.
Sigh... your (and folks who posted before you) math is completely wrong. Each crate is a separate "event", so it doesn't matter how much crates you buy, you have exactly the same chance to get a mount every time you open the crate. The calculations you posted above would be correct, if the items you got from crates were removed from the pool - and obviously they are not, hence the "doubles". Statistically, you have the same chance to get a mount in two consecutive crates or get none in 2000.
Let me write it once more: you have EXACTLY THE SAME CHANCE to get the item you want EVERY TIME YOU OPEN THE CRATE! It doesn't cumulate! That's the trick, most people don't realise that and they buy hundreds of crates hoping that their chances increase with every crate, but it does not.
Source: I used to do a lot of statistics in my research. If you don't believe me, google it. Or be a clueless sheep, I don't care.
I can understand why you used to do a lot of statistics.
I can't understand why if you did do a loto statistics, you never heard of Bernouilli trials or binomial distributions.
You have 0.15% to get an Apex Radiant mount for each trial, but you don't have 0.15% chance to get a mount after nth trials.
What's at hand here is the calculation of a probability of success after a given number of trials in the case of independent events with given odds.
What are the chances you roll a 6? 0.1667.
What are the chances you roll a 6 after 3 trials?
If you believe it's 0.16667, YOU are the clueless sheep.
Good luck with your research.
Yeah, math debate. Actually, @Streega, I'm in an engineering school, and what I'm talking about is from highschool.
I'm not talking about the chance of getting the loot at the crate number N. But getting at least one reward with N crates which is the same event as not getting nothing for N trials. Simply put. You throw a dice. You have 1/6 chance to get the number 6. You throw it again, you still have 1/6 chance to get 6. So, that's 5/6 chance for each throw to not get a 6. So, if you throw your dice twice, you have 5/6 squared to not get 6 on neither of these throws. You just have to take the probability of the complementary event. That's a Bernoulli trial, and the binomial law, which consists of a serie of Bernoulli trials.
I don't want to be rude, but I noticed a lot of people have problems with statistics, and have really strong *false* opinions on how it works. That's ok, but don't be aggressive
Elwendryll wrote: »Elwendryll wrote: »Using the data from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n1kdrywYmgjx290QwGJj9TT1Y8z4GfEMhvQ8kQnKL5g/edit#gid=897651316
I did some math. A radiant apex reward has supposedly a chance of dropping roughly equal to 0.17% (Hollowjack season).
You can't guarantee a loot, however, you can get close to it.
According to my calculations, here are the number of crates required to get the associated chance to loot at least 1 radiant apex reward.
2707 crates: 99% chance of looting at least 1 radiant apex.
1354: 90%
815: 75%
408: 50%
170: 25%
As you can see, that's exactly like CP, you have diminishing returns
Bonus: I'm not at home an I don't have my calculator so that's handmade values, just a binomial law. 1-0.9983^x, x being the number of crates, should give you the odds of not getting nothing.
Sigh... your (and folks who posted before you) math is completely wrong. Each crate is a separate "event", so it doesn't matter how much crates you buy, you have exactly the same chance to get a mount every time you open the crate. The calculations you posted above would be correct, if the items you got from crates were removed from the pool - and obviously they are not, hence the "doubles". Statistically, you have the same chance to get a mount in two consecutive crates or get none in 2000.
Let me write it once more: you have EXACTLY THE SAME CHANCE to get the item you want EVERY TIME YOU OPEN THE CRATE! It doesn't cumulate! That's the trick, most people don't realise that and they buy hundreds of crates hoping that their chances increase with every crate, but it does not.
Source: I used to do a lot of statistics in my research. If you don't believe me, google it. Or be a clueless sheep, I don't care.
I can understand why you used to do a lot of statistics.
I can't understand why if you did do a loto statistics, you never heard of Bernouilli trials or binomial distributions.
You have 0.15% to get an Apex Radiant mount for each trial, but you don't have 0.15% chance to get a mount after nth trials.
What's at hand here is the calculation of a probability of success after a given number of trials in the case of independent events with given odds.
What are the chances you roll a 6? 0.1667.
What are the chances you roll a 6 after 3 trials?
If you believe it's 0.16667, YOU are the clueless sheep.
Good luck with your research.
Yeah, math debate. Actually, @Streega, I'm in an engineering school, and what I'm talking about is from highschool.
I'm not talking about the chance of getting the loot at the crate number N. But getting at least one reward with N crates which is the same event as not getting nothing for N trials. Simply put. You throw a dice. You have 1/6 chance to get the number 6. You throw it again, you still have 1/6 chance to get 6. So, that's 5/6 chance for each throw to not get a 6. So, if you throw your dice twice, you have 5/6 squared to not get 6 on neither of these throws. You just have to take the probability of the complementary event. That's a Bernoulli trial, and the binomial law, which consists of a serie of Bernoulli trials.
I don't want to be rude, but I noticed a lot of people have problems with statistics, and have really strong *false* opinions on how it works. That's ok, but don't be aggressive
I'm sorry if I sounded rude, I'm just old grumpy cat and I'm bit frustrated that so many ppl walk in the trap. To be clear: I researched actual, already existing data (like the one in google sheet mentioned above), not exactly the probability, so I may be a little off track here. Furthermore it was 20 years ago and I don't work in the field anymore. I'm still pretty sure I'm right - maybe not 100% mathematically, but factually.
I do agree that for $150 you should be guaranteed 2-3 apex mounts, but i usually get just 1, or none. Only got 2 out of the Wild Hunt crates.
If you feel spending any amount of money at all 'guarantees' you a rare drop, then you really don't understand what the words 'random' and 'gambling' mean.
The only thing you are guaranteed to have when buying Crown Crates, is some Crown Crates.
I'm sorry for the OP, or anyone else, who didn't get the drops they want, but complaining about it on the forums seems a little entitled to me.
Why so salty? Why comment if you're not gonna add anything to the discussion other than animosity?
DMuehlhausen wrote: »
GreenhaloX wrote: »Before you call me an idiot and stick a kick me sign on my back.. I know, I know, but I really would like to get at least one, or two, of the Radiant Apex Award mounts from these current Scalecaller crates. That Galvanic Storm Steed, Dragonfire wolf and Shadow-Rider Senche look so cool. After 60 crates, not one ffing Radiant Apex reward. Only got one damn mount from the Apex reward; rest are all crap potions, poisons, scrolls and shitt repeatedly. WTF.. 60 ffing crates/ 20k crowns wasted. You would think we would have received at least 1 or 2 from the Radiant Apex and a few from the Apex; mounts specifically. I feel like (if I could) shove all these crates up somebody's arse over there in the Zen and ZOS land. Damn, this shitt needs rework and improved bad. . Had a thumb back up for the recent fix to the 2H reticle issue. Now this.. thumb is back down. Goodness..
TelvanniWizard wrote: »DMuehlhausen wrote: »
They are. It´s paying real currency for a chance to get some price. Because people want the price, nobody buys crates for the potions, so don´t start with the "you always get something" story. It´s hands down gambling.