Mudcrabber wrote: »I say "characters", but I'm also the kind that uses complete sentences and full punctuation when I send messages on my phone.
You can't tell me what to say.
Probably the same type of person who got Bill C16 implemented in my country...
If you have a problem with the things people do or don't say there's a simple solution - get over it.
Hahaha.i guess you created this thread because I answered the other one saying toons.
Get over ir
AcadianPaladin wrote: »Can't really select an option since there are two parts to this:
'Do you say toon?' - No. Not ever.
'Stop it!' - Not interested in telling others what to call their characters.
Eh.I can’t stand the word “toons” for our characters...
So it may be... And guess what...It’s more than a pet peeve!
Ajaxandriel wrote: »In my language "toon" is not translatable to begin with, so we say "rerolls"
or "persos" (shortened from personnages, that means "characters")
Otherwise here I'd say "alts" anyway.
The word "Toons" would remind me those creepy movies from the 80s....
really, out of all the things to *** and moan about, this is what you chose OP?
TheShadowScout wrote: »Eh.I can’t stand the word “toons” for our characters...
I don't really like it much myself, but... I am not arrogant enough to tell people what they can or cannot say.
"Character" works fine for me. Always been that, ever since I started Pen&Paper roleplaying back in what, 1986, 87 or so?
"Avatar" maybe, if you just mean the visual digital representation in the game without RP backstory included... like, when you refer to making visual changes to your -avatar- while keeping the same -character- backstory and such...
"Alt" if referring to an -ALTernate character- from your "main" character.
"Dude" always feels wierd to me when refering to female characters... I don't care that statistically 83% of them are G.I.R.L. (Guys In Real Life), for one that still leaves those who are the gender they play as, and for another it just irks my roleplayer sensitivities to not refer to the in-character gender... and in any case, the first rule of a MMORPG is... you don't talk about the RL (unless both sides choose differently).So it may be... And guess what...It’s more than a pet peeve!
Its pretty much like me and pineapple on pizza. I dislike that. I would not want it. I could not stand it.
Some might agree. Some might disagree.
Noone cares.
But I don't go around demanding those who might enjoy it to stop that just because I have a different opinion.
If you don't like the term "toon" for MMORPG characters, then just don't use it.
Use other terms, and hope they will rub off on the people you talk with.
Maybe play dumb on occasion, and pretend you thought they were talking about cartoons instead of ESO or something... or politely -ask- them to not use that term with you "to avoid confusing you".
But its not a good idea to tell others what they can or cannot do, how they should live their life, how -your- opinion about how things are supposed to be should be the only valid one... that one always ends in bad blood somewhere.
Instead, you might be well served in exercising some tolerance and maybe choose to be -amused- about other peoples sillyness in using an possibly confusing term like "toons" for their characters...
Saucy_Jack wrote: »I say "sploops"
There's no good reason to call them "toons." Anyone with a background in tabletop RPGs (you know, the hobby from which video game RPGs are based) would call them "characters" or I abbreviate as "char" when writing.
"Toon" predates WoW so anyone guessing it comes from WoWs cartoon graphics is wrong. It probably comes from people were really enjoyed Disney and cartoons but never had any RPG background. I find the usage distasteful.
I say “character” or “avatar” or “avvie” or “alt” or “dude”.
TheShadowScout wrote: »"Dude" always feels wierd to me when refering to female characters... I don't care that statistically 83% of them are G.I.R.L. (Guys In Real Life), for one that still leaves those who are the gender they play as, and for another it just irks my roleplayer sensitivities to not refer to the in-character gender... and in any case, the first rule of a MMORPG is... you don't talk about the RL (unless both sides choose differently).I can’t stand the word “toons” for our characters...
LiquidPony wrote: »I say “character” or “avatar” or “avvie” or “alt” or “dude”.
Wow. You have a problem with "toon" but you have the nerve to say "avvie"? Avvie? Forrealz bruh?
Sylvermynx wrote: »There's no good reason to call them "toons." Anyone with a background in tabletop RPGs (you know, the hobby from which video game RPGs are based) would call them "characters" or I abbreviate as "char" when writing.
"Toon" predates WoW so anyone guessing it comes from WoWs cartoon graphics is wrong. It probably comes from people were really enjoyed Disney and cartoons but never had any RPG background. I find the usage distasteful.
I've called "characters" toons since I DM'd AD&D back in the mid-70s - because that was just a good way to refer to "caricatures" of the sort in a fantasy game, sorry @Kanar. So, I'm not changing now, for sure!
Actually its a bit older then that...Avatars and “avvies” come from Second Life a decade or more ago.
But I guess Second Life did just pick up what went before, so...The use of the term avatar for the on-screen representation of the user was coined in 1985 by Richard Garriott for the computer game Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar. In this game, Garriott desired the player's character to be his earth self manifested into the virtual world. Garriott did this because he wanted the real player to be responsible for the character's in game actions due to the ethical parables he designed into the story. Only if you were playing "yourself" Garriott felt, could you be judged based on your character's actions. Because of its ethically-nuanced, story-driven approach, he took the Hindu word associated with a deity's manifestation on earth in physical form, and applied it to a player manifesting in the game world