Those are often in their 60s-70s and are less advanced PC users than an average ESO player. Though once I indeed witnessed a player (not in ESO tho) who could fall for something like this..... but later he revealed to the guild that he had a serious mental disability. However such people are still quite rare, at least in my personal experience.Believe it or not, yes, there are people that would give up that information. There are still people who fall for the Nigerian prince scam.
Are they worried that someone will make an ingame RP movie and then monetize is on the youtube? I'm actually now genuinely curious what is in the root of such rule.Other MMO’s I’ve played have not allowed players to name their characters after in-game NPC’s, probably to protect their intellectual property rights. Actually I’m surprised they allowed it at all for a period of time
StormChaser3000 wrote: »Those are often in their 60s-70s and are less advanced PC users than an average ESO player. Though once I indeed witnessed a player (not in ESO tho) who could fall for something like this..... but later he revealed to the guild that he had a serious mental disability. However such people are still quite rare, at least in my personal experience.
Are they worried that someone will make an ingame RP movie and then monetize is on the youtube? I'm actually now genuinely curious what is in the root of such rule.
LadyNalcarya wrote: »Well, those "Boethias and Nocturnals" could be used as "npcs" in the story, not as main characters, much like in tabletop rpgs.
And why cant they rp as Silvenar and Green Lady, for example? People like creating stories about characters they like, that's why fanfiction is a thing. I can understand that ZOS wouldnt want to see copies of characters that belong to other companies due to legal reasons, but if we're talking about TES characters, whats the problem?
@LadyNalcarya
I admit I have no idea about how role playing works in a MMORPG, but I think it is something that plays out (also, if not mainly) in the open world, so I think that the possibility of meeting multiple instances of characters taken from lore or outright appearing in game would break the immersion a bit.
For example, what happens if a She Ogo Rath meets a Sheaw Gorath while roleplaying in the same group/zone? They duel to establish who's the real one? They throw a fit like two ladies with the same dress at a party? They quietly ignore each other?
The general idea is that some characters should be unique, although I realize that unique and MMO games just don't go together.
Girl_Number8 wrote: »Oof, now they're nerfing names too~
StormChaser3000 wrote: »Are they worried that someone will make an ingame RP movie and then monetize is on the youtube? I'm actually now genuinely curious what is in the root of such rule.
starkerealm wrote: »
It's probably a liability issue, ironically enough.
So, this goes back almost a decade. Marvel sued Cryptic (or Atari, I don't remember which, I'm going to assume Cryptic for the rest because otherwise it would be Cryptic/Atari, so this is faster) because people were recreating Marvel characters in Champions Online using the character creation tools, claiming the action was copyright or trademark infringement (I can't remember which.) It kinda was. The specific case torpedoed when it turned out that the in game characters Marvel's lawyers were citing had been created by investigators working for Marvel's legal team. Unclean hands and all that.
Now, that ended with three part test. Name, appearance, backstory (CO allowed you write up a quick biography for your character, which could be viewed by other players when they inspected you.) If you met two of the three on your character, that was considered to be infringing, and you would be forced to change them.
That was a settlement between Cryptic and Marvel. It's still up in the air, but as a developer you can potentially get sued for using someone else's IP as a character name in your MMO.
Now, it's not likely to happen, the spat between Cryptic and Marvel came from CO starting development under contract with Marvel, and then one, or both, parties split, so the suit looks way less like a legitimate tort, and more like retribution.
Now, ZOS isn't going to get sued by Zenimax over someone using Pelinal Whitestrake as a character name. That's not going to happen. They could, theoretically, get sued over someone naming their character Captain Kirk, Luke Skywalker, Spiderman, or any number of other trademarked characters.
At that point, it's way easier to simply say, "no, you can't use any names from fiction, including ours," than it is to partition out which rights you expect problems from and which ones you don't.
If all of this sounds kinda absurd... it's because it kinda is. But, as an attorney, never let logic and reason stand in the way of vigorously defending your client's legitimate interests. I'd say, "racking up billable hours," but, for most IP lawyers this is really motivated by being able to get your client a payday.
starkerealm wrote: »
Remember the guy who used to run around with Gamemaster in their name?
Who cares. Zos has always forced players to change their character names when the clearly inappropriate name was reported to them.
What happened with OP is no different. It is a copyrighted name yet he seems to feel entitled to use it since he is clearly upset Zos made him change it. It is common games force character name changes for the very same reason.
PelinalWhitestrake wrote: »Now that's just silly.
I'm waiting for my notification that I need to change my forum name now. Hurry up, I don't have all day.
PelinalWhitestrake wrote: »Now that's just silly.
I'm waiting for my notification that I need to change my forum name now. Hurry up, I don't have all day.
Well, I doubt they're actively looking for those particular names. I've seen some names with Padomay in it, a few Umarils and other Elder Scrolls related names... Magnus... even a Gandalf the Fabulous.starkerealm wrote: »
It's because you're Batman.
But, seriously, they don't care about usernames, or I'd be on the chopping block, but they do care about character names. Again, I think this is a liability issue, but I'm not positive.
arpadsweb16_ESO wrote: »I like how they advertise and charge money for people to dress up like Lore characters, morph into them in the form of costumes as well as obtaining iconic artifact appearances, but having an Elder Scrolls name is a big no-no.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
MehrunesFlagon wrote: »That would include a good portion of my characters too since they are named after GOT characters.