JusticeSouldier wrote: »bought 1 slot.
used it at (thanks fortune) at main character.
then, relogged to another character to design new outfit...and ... ***...naturally scammed.
On Outfit slot upgrade there are any information that it is not account-wide.
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom I expect apologizes from Zenimax for such scam and adding the description "Only for one character" on this good, or making it account-wide. U've stole my money.
Still no reply from ZOS ?
That is low
DaveMoeDee wrote: »
I still haven't caved on this, and I check back on this thread regularly.
I have all 15 characters looking the way I like in their primary appearance, which has used up the free outfit slot. If these things were account wide, I probably would have bought all 10 by now, as I used to be big on acquiring motifs. As outfit slots are not account-wide, I am also not buying any motif pages off other players, or motifs from the crown store.
Morgha_Kul wrote: »I still haven't caved on this, and I check back on this thread regularly.
I have all 15 characters looking the way I like in their primary appearance, which has used up the free outfit slot. If these things were account wide, I probably would have bought all 10 by now, as I used to be big on acquiring motifs. As outfit slots are not account-wide, I am also not buying any motif pages off other players, or motifs from the crown store.
And consider how much money they would have made from you if you had bought all those outfit slots, and how much on those motifs. That's LOST REVENUE.
Considering that you're just one of many, consider how much lost revenue there has been over this.
Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
I'd rather ask "why are some players in such a hurry to bash this kind of marketing schemes instead of simply not buying, which would be the only way to make ZOS lower the prices ? Is this some kind of enjoyment of wasting time and energy ? "
lordrichter wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
I'd rather ask "why are some players in such a hurry to bash this kind of marketing schemes instead of simply not buying, which would be the only way to make ZOS lower the prices ? Is this some kind of enjoyment of wasting time and energy ? "
When people do not buy, and do not say why, ZOS has to guess why before they can ignore the reason. When people do not buy, and make it clear why they are not buying, then ZOS knows why and can go straight to ignoring us. Saves ZOS a step.
@anitajoneb17_ESO I just do not have the words for you. I'm absolutely appalled. It's even made all the worse because you yourself admit that it has a scamming aspect to it, and such the legality of it could be contested. And yet... Have a nice day
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
I'd rather ask "why are some players in such a hurry to bash this kind of marketing schemes instead of simply not buying, which would be the only way to make ZOS lower the prices ? Is this some kind of enjoyment of wasting time and energy ? "
DaveMoeDee wrote: »Isn't it obvious that you are talking about different sets of people? They aren't buying, but they want more outfit slots at a reasonable price. Customers SHOULD complain about things they don't like. Personally, I don't care since we are just talking about cosmetics here and I don't play games to dress up. But there is nothing wrong with those who do being vocal.
There is also nothing wrong with you finding them annoying. Just don't claim they are buying slots when they aren't.
Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Actually this conversation brings the question : why are some players in such a hurry to defend this kind of marketing schemes ? Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome derivative ?
I'd rather ask "why are some players in such a hurry to bash this kind of marketing schemes instead of simply not buying, which would be the only way to make ZOS lower the prices ? Is this some kind of enjoyment of wasting time and energy ? "
Well, to this I have an answer ! Because
a) voting with your wallet is actually a terribly inequal way of pretending to follow some form of democracy, since the more money you have the more important your vote will be. Thus, an absence of vote (of money use) erases you from the democratic system while those who vote (use the money) are heard
b) even if voting with one's money or lack thereof were to work, it is a terribly slow process, and we don't have time for this guarpoop in a video game that's supposed to be for enjoyment.
Besides, given now that democracy applies in EVERY aspect of life. @anitajoneb17_ESO and I just had a vote, and we voted that you give us each all your money. 2 out of 3 votes (I'm assuming you voted), sorry, majority rules, you wouldn't want to be undemocratic now would you?
JusticeSouldier wrote: »bought 1 slot.
used it at (thanks fortune) at main character.
then, relogged to another character to design new outfit...and ... ***...naturally scammed.
On Outfit slot upgrade there are any information that it is not account-wide.
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom I expect apologizes from Zenimax for such scam and adding the description "Only for one character" on this good, or making it account-wide. U've stole my money.
Morgha_Kul wrote: »Good lord, you people are overcomplicating this.
It's all pretty simple.
They're charging an amount for this service/product that is disproportionately high, relative to similar services/products in other similar games.
This is causing a few things.
First, it's generating less revenue, as not everyone can afford or is willing to pay the excessive price.
Second, it's generating ill will among the customers, as they feel they are being gouged if they pay the price.
Third, it's generating ill will as customers are not being made aware that the product is limited to a single character. Indeed, this borders on fraudulent behaviour.
Fourth, this ill will is degrading the reputation of the company as word of mouth spreads (and it IS), describing the company as greedy/corrupt.
Fifth, this damage to their reputation discourages new customers from purchasing their product, which further damages their revenue.
Somewhere down this line lies the end of the game. It's not imminent, but it's there.
None of this has anything to do with democracy or anything else you care to use to obfuscate the issue.
Besides, given now that democracy applies in EVERY aspect of life. @anitajoneb17_ESO and I just had a vote, and we voted that you give us each all your money. 2 out of 3 votes (I'm assuming you voted), sorry, majority rules, you wouldn't want to be undemocratic now would you?
democracy principles are much more complicated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy.
Srry but your example is manipulation and gambling of words
Morgha_Kul wrote: »Good lord, you people are overcomplicating this.
First, it's generating less revenue, as not everyone can afford or is willing to pay the excessive price.
Second, it's generating ill will among the customers, as they feel they are being gouged if they pay the price.
Third, it's generating ill will as customers are not being made aware that the product is limited to a single character. Indeed, this borders on fraudulent behaviour.
Fourth, this ill will is degrading the reputation of the company as word of mouth spreads (and it IS), describing the company as greedy/corrupt.
Fifth, this damage to their reputation discourages new customers from purchasing their product, which further damages their revenue.
Somewhere down this line lies the end of the game. It's not imminent, but it's there.
None of this has anything to do with democracy or anything else you care to use to obfuscate the issue.
lordrichter wrote: »
Remember, they know how many people are using outfit slots, and on how many characters, and how many are not. We have no clue. If ZOS saw something wrong in those numbers, they would have already changed something.
This does not mean that I will stop trying, but they never listened to me about Crown Crates, and I doubt they will listen to me about Outfit Slots.
EDIT: What ZOS can do is fix the @&#^! description so that people know what they are buying. That they have not done that also says something about their motives and practices. Not good things.