Vivec EU-PC

elfantasmo · June 2017

#ITSALLABOUTPVDOOR

Cogo · June 2017

Last night at around 1 am, DC crowned emp and took every single AD keep. AD Pop was full - DC pop 2 - Pact pop 2.
AD tried to zerg their keeps but got quite impressively denied by DC, who didn't care one bit Red keeps.
(Since pact havnt learned how to siege, DC didnt loose more then Chalman - Bleakers - BRK)

We (pact) got to fight DC the rest of the night, because there was almost no AD north of Faregyl untill DC pop was 1.

I guess DC also got fed up with ADs night caps.

Glamdring · June 2017

GO AD, GO AD.

We shall emerge victorious once again.

Highlight of yesterday. AD EMP dethroning himself at ROE with his EP Zerg.

ZoS, time to lock account to one allicance and fix the queue exploit.

And for all you Screaming cliff xv1 spammers, *** YOU.
And for all you procblades xv1ers, *** YOU.
And for all sorcs, *** YOU

Jam · June 2017

See ? there he goes again, fooling around..

Lieblingsjunge · June 2017

Isbilen wrote: »

Server crashes daily, a certain cheese ball takes a break and the server doesn't crash for days, they come back and it immediately crashes. Coincidence?

I'm just gonna copy my post from another forum, since you did:

Look at it this way:
The server has a set number of calculations it can do within a timeframe, let's say 100 for the sake of it. When ZS does not raid there - but the other ballgroups do(UF, DA, Prootch to sime extent, TDA, Shadow League, Team Masenko and probably the others I forgot, please forgive me), then the server is just within the limit, at 99. But when you add another ballgroup(ZS in this case), the server strain becomes too much, putting it at.. let's say 103 for the sake of it. That doesn't make it ZS' fault - but they of course contribute to it - and no one should say anything else. ZS contribute to server crash. DA contributes to server crash. Prootch contributes. Big boss contributes. Those smallscale groups contributes to it - just the concentration is different from the smallscale and the larger crowds.

I am still surprised to see that all your hate and triggering seem to be directed towards one specific ballgroup - when there's more ballgroups on DC / AD than on EP. But hey, better hating on something concrete than on something abstract, right? :^ People are easy to hate - bad servers are not.
--
Last night's rollback gave my my achievement twice. WHERE IS MY DOUBLE TITLE.

AbraXuSeXile · June 2017

Stop blaming bomb groups its the solo zerg surfer heroes making a 100 v 100 fight

Nermy · June 2017

Why are we blaming each other? Classic war strategy by ZoS making us rip each others throats out when in reality we should be blaming them!!

elfantasmo · June 2017

Nermy wrote: »

Why are we blaming each other? Classic war strategy by ZoS making us rip each others throats out when in reality we should be blaming them!!

I see the truth!

LarsS · June 2017

Nermy wrote: »

Why are we blaming each other? Classic war strategy by ZoS making us rip each others throats out when in reality we should be blaming them!!

I agree with you, Its time for ZOS show a interest in Cyro pvp and communicate with the pvp community. I want a prof from ZOS that they really read our suggestions, the present scilence is not acceptable any longer.

kuro-dono · June 2017

its the community:s own fault for exploiting and abusing bugs and griefing people so much that has slowed down zenimax progress of upgrading and making nice stuff for us.

Feanor · June 2017

AbraXuSeXile wrote: »

Stop blaming bomb groups its the solo zerg surfer heroes making a 100 v 100 fight

I think the issue is that there is not that much to do any more. Faction pride is a thing of the past, and with the rewards being what they are, playing for the campaign is something just a few still do. Which leads to people farming non organized groups or just masses of non grouped players for easy AP (like you did yesterday at Sej). People don't like getting farmed repeatedly and thus blame the organized groups. Rinse and repeat. Ultimately we need something fresh and new after 3 years of standard Cyrodiil and it's not he addition of town flags. Something that shifts the interest away from just farming AP over and over. Just my 2 cents.

prootch · June 2017

not for your eyes nermy

only the said rageboyz do get it and rage accordingly

Cogo · June 2017

Prootch and Nermy was sitting in a tree. R-A-A-G-I-N-G

Nermy · June 2017

prootch wrote: »

not for your eyes nermy only the said rageboyz do get it and rage accordingly

Ok mate. Not looking!!!

Cogo wrote: »

Prootch and Nermy was sitting in a tree. R-A-A-G-I-N-G

And I never rage Oghur, you know that...

prootch · June 2017

Cogo wrote: »

Prootch and Nermy was sitting in a tree. R-A-A-G-I-N-G

Cogo, you have no clue, dont get into it

Miruku · June 2017

Still loving the salt

and im pretty sure Oghur has no clue about anything prootch

Cogo · June 2017

Of course I don't. I'm an orc.

Biro123 · June 2017

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

kuro-dono · June 2017

Biro123 wrote: »

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

it would be nice to have campaign where casuals could be just casuals, but those dreams always get ruined by either procblades/trigger sorcs or gank squad or aoe choo choo.

Etaniel · June 2017

kuro-dono wrote: »

Biro123 wrote: »

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

it would be nice to have campaign where casuals could be just casuals, but those dreams always get ruined by either procblades/trigger sorcs or gank squad or aoe choo choo.

I see where you're coming from, but you can't expect people to "downgrade" themselves when they face lower tier players.

kuro-dono · June 2017

Etaniel wrote: »

kuro-dono wrote: »

Biro123 wrote: »

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

it would be nice to have campaign where casuals could be just casuals, but those dreams always get ruined by either procblades/trigger sorcs or gank squad or aoe choo choo.

I see where you're coming from, but you can't expect people to "downgrade" themselves when they face lower tier players.

so therefore, itwould be nice to have campaign PURELY AND ONLY for those who want to have it nice and easy? no griefers, no trollers and possibly great AvAvA environment.

Etaniel · June 2017

kuro-dono wrote: »

Etaniel wrote: »

kuro-dono wrote: »

Biro123 wrote: »

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

it would be nice to have campaign where casuals could be just casuals, but those dreams always get ruined by either procblades/trigger sorcs or gank squad or aoe choo choo.

I see where you're coming from, but you can't expect people to "downgrade" themselves when they face lower tier players.

so therefore, itwould be nice to have campaign PURELY AND ONLY for those who want to have it nice and easy? no griefers, no trollers and possibly great AvAvA environment.

By your definition, a campaign nice and easy is a campaign where you have no resistance. So no pvp?

kuro-dono · June 2017

Etaniel wrote: »

kuro-dono wrote: »

Etaniel wrote: »

kuro-dono wrote: »

Biro123 wrote: »

So I did a new thing last night.. I joined a group. A Pug Group..

It was sold as the most badly led group ever, and boasted the self-professed worst magDK ever and worst Stamsorc ever. Just my thing!

We took a keep! Yay!

Then Kas n co. blew us up. Boo!

I may do it again one day (but hopefully without the explody-Kas thing).

it would be nice to have campaign where casuals could be just casuals, but those dreams always get ruined by either procblades/trigger sorcs or gank squad or aoe choo choo.

I see where you're coming from, but you can't expect people to "downgrade" themselves when they face lower tier players.

so therefore, itwould be nice to have campaign PURELY AND ONLY for those who want to have it nice and easy? no griefers, no trollers and possibly great AvAvA environment.

By your definition, a campaign nice and easy is a campaign where you have no resistance. So no pvp?

thats bit off, as i do enjoy dying quite lot. and if i am not mistaken, love raid stayed at old thornblade to fight alone vs pop locked ebon pact, and similarly love didnt give up either fighting against big boss and his herd at azura before they suddenly moved.

casual doesnt mean that they want to cheese, casual means folk s who want to enjoy combat and just die and spawn, win and lose. no addiction to remain gods among men or just zerg / farm at bridge or milegate. casuals are folks like me who do their best but dont attempt to tryhard.

PS nice and easy doesnt mean zero resistance either. its just.. as vast majority players in eso are, nice and easy, no tryharding no making complex builds, no making complex group setups. just go with whatever you got, kill and die lose and win. i get angry when i need to swap from my stamina templar to my tank sorc to root and negate when ppl around who play more organized than the usual folks and my stamina templar has no real utility there.

Cogo · June 2017

Unless I am outnumbered 10 - 1, I am not enjoying myself in Cyro

kuro-dono · June 2017

love raid is honourable raid, its not either that we begging for attension. we fight even if the odds are against us, but if ppl moan about our tactics, thats all about ava. if it triggers ppl, then it means we doing that we doing something right. hiding in keep isnt cowardic, its available tactic. if iwant to bash my head against near unkillable raid i would do that somewhere else than run somewhere miles. if i want to win against faction where that specific raid belongs to, then i will utilize more than my char as an tool to give my faction chance to win campaign.

Miruku · June 2017

Cogo wrote: »

Unless I am outnumbered 10 - 1, I am not enjoying myself in Cyro

You outnumbered me 7 to 1 and still lost

Etaniel · July 2017

Special thanks to the people who love coming back after getting killed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR2CcXB0afU

Nermy · July 2017

Etaniel wrote: »

Special thanks to the people who love coming back after getting killed

Never ceases to amaze me... I'd call them lemmings but that would be a disservice to lemmings.

Derra · July 2017

Go AD. The pratical proof that numbers matter more than anything else in eso.

MipMip · July 2017

Nermy wrote: »

Why are we blaming each other? Classic war strategy by ZoS making us rip each others throats out when in reality we should be blaming them!!

I clicked 'agree' on your comment but reading again I feel this is not enough, so quoting for more emphasis on how much I agree! (when for once I agree with you @Nermy

)

It is up to ZOS to properly support the various play styles and numbers of players that the game allows. I purchased and sub ESO because of what it promises to deliver in terms of PvP experience.