reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...
corrosivechains wrote: »reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...https://youtu.be/k2h72aXVP8o
That's easy. A baby elephant is smarge.AtAfternoon wrote: »Large compared to what? Is a baby elephant small or large?
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |
REally? I have to pay MORE than the actual game to get this expansion. Whose genius idea was THAT?!
corrosivechains wrote: »reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...https://youtu.be/k2h72aXVP8o
LOL... This Jessica Simpson "Chicken of the Sea" convo actually crossed my mind when I was posting this...This argument is just as stupid...
My theory is they're calling them "chapters" in case they decide to release a chapter with less content some day. If they don't call it an expansion, they are free to make the content as much or as little as they like. For example, if one day they release a new character class and nothing else, they can call it a "chapter." If they call it an "expansion," they're creating an expectation of a huge amount of content.corrosivechains wrote: »it's hilarious that those same 5 people defending this are still calling it an "expansion" when even ZOS refuses to call it an "expansion". They're being very careful to NOT call it an "expansion", because it isn't on par with what traditional MMO's release as such. It's a "chapter", quit trying to obfuscate what this is.
reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...
"CosmicSoul wrote: »
Eq and wow came out with expansions all the time while you did not get any of it for subbing and everyone had to sub to play.
LiquidSchwartz wrote: »First of all, if you think a DLC is the same as an EXPANSION
LiquidSchwartz wrote: »First of all, if you think a DLC is the same as an EXPANSION.. you have found your problem.
They are not the same. I agree with not giving it to subs, and I sub.
It is an expansion to the game not just some small crap zone with a lame skill line to progress quests to milk the time we spend in there.
They only said it covers DLC.. wrothgar is as good as it should get for DLC size/content. This is bigger than wrothgar.
people always feel that theyre entitled to stuff for the wrong reasons
MLGProPlayer wrote: »I see a lot of strawman arguments being made. Nobody seems to understand why some people are angry.
People don't care about the price of the DLC. $40 is not a lot of money.
People are angry because ZOS has changed their revenue model AGAIN, leaving subscribers out to dry. The most loyal fans of the game feel betrayed because they felt they were paying for something, at a rate of $180 a year, that they will not receive now.
Had ZOS been clear from the start on what constitutes a DLC and what constitutes an expansion (two interchangeable terms), this whole mess could have been avoided. People who subbed for access to all future content, might not have subbed if they knew expansions would not be included in that rate.
These are players who have contributed many times the value of the DLC through their subscription, yet they are not getting any recognition for that now.
The worst part is that these players cannot even use the crowns they have accumulated to buy this latest expansion. These are real dollars that were paid to ZOS.
This is why some people are angry.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »I see a lot of strawman arguments being made. Nobody seems to understand why some people are angry.
People don't care about the price of the DLC. $40 is not a lot of money.
People are angry because ZOS has changed their revenue model AGAIN, leaving subscribers out to dry. The most loyal fans of the game feel betrayed because they felt they were paying for something, at a rate of $180 a year, that they will not receive now.
Had ZOS been clear from the start on what constitutes a DLC and what constitutes an expansion (two interchangeable terms), this whole mess could have been avoided. People who subbed for access to all future content, might not have subbed if they knew expansions would not be included in that rate.
These are players who have contributed many times the value of the DLC through their subscription, yet they are not getting any recognition for that now.
The worst part is that these players cannot even use the crowns they have accumulated to buy this latest expansion. These are real dollars that were paid to ZOS.
This is why some people are angry.
SydneyGrey wrote: »My theory is they're calling them "chapters" in case they decide to release a chapter with less content some day. If they don't call it an expansion, they are free to make the content as much or as little as they like. For example, if one day they release a new character class and nothing else, they can call it a "chapter." If they call it an "expansion," they're creating an expectation of a huge amount of content.corrosivechains wrote: »it's hilarious that those same 5 people defending this are still calling it an "expansion" when even ZOS refuses to call it an "expansion". They're being very careful to NOT call it an "expansion", because it isn't on par with what traditional MMO's release as such. It's a "chapter", quit trying to obfuscate what this is.
Very simple, really.
We all know Morrowind will fit the traditional definition of an expansion, which is why I was calling it an expansion.
reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...
medusasfolly wrote: »reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...
And now we know that just because ZOS says something, it most definitely does not mean that it is true....
LiquidSchwartz wrote: »First of all, if you think a DLC is the same as an EXPANSION.. you have found your problem.
They are not the same. I agree with not giving it to subs, and I sub.
It is an expansion to the game not just some small crap zone with a lame skill line to progress quests to milk the time we spend in there.
They only said it covers DLC.. wrothgar is as good as it should get for DLC size/content. This is bigger than wrothgar.
people always feel that theyre entitled to stuff for the wrong reasons
MLGProPlayer wrote: »I see a lot of strawman arguments being made. Nobody seems to understand why some people are angry.
People don't care about the price of the DLC. $40 is not a lot of money.
People are angry because ZOS has changed their revenue model AGAIN, leaving subscribers out to dry. The most loyal fans of the game feel betrayed because they felt they were paying for something, at a rate of $180 a year, that they will not receive now.
Had ZOS been clear from the start on what constitutes a DLC and what constitutes an expansion (two interchangeable terms), this whole mess could have been avoided. People who subbed for access to all future content, might not have subbed if they knew expansions would not be included in that rate.
These are players who have contributed many times the value of the DLC through their subscription, yet they are not getting any recognition for that now.
The worst part is that these players cannot even use the crowns they have accumulated to buy this latest expansion. These are real dollars that were paid to ZOS.
This is why some people are angry.
It is about the money... its always about the money...If it were "free" (the price = $0) then it wouldn't be an issue... so it is in fact about the price...
medusasfolly wrote: »reapthetempestrwb17_ESO wrote: »
Uhhh...So what is it?... a DLC or an expansion? And just because the media says something most definitely does not mean that it is true...
And now we know that just because ZOS says something, it most definitely does not mean that it is true....
But in the land of ZoS if they say its a DLC to them then in their business model, it is a DLC and if they choose to say it is a chapter (or expansion) then in their business model it is a chapter... so when you are using THEIR service and agreeing to THEIR ToS what they call it is in fact reality... if you don't agree with either connotation of the terms than as they clearly state in their ToS, you are free to stop using THEIR service...
Downloadable Content, Achievements, and Other Virtual Items
Content also includes Content that is downloaded or downloadable from any website under ZeniMax's control ("Downloadable Content"), provided that the term Downloadable Content does not include Game Mods (as defined below). Downloadable Content includes, but is not limited to, licensed rights granted, awarded, and/or provided to You to access and/or use online or off-line elements or features of certain Services as well as Game updates, unlockable Content, digital and/or virtual assets, rights of use tied to unlock keys or codes, serial codes and/or online authentication of any kind, in-game achievements, video trailers, Game screenshots, and/or Game-related wallpapers
Right now you are looking at Orsinium or Wrothgar which is probably scheduled to be one of our earlier packs and you know, if you decide you want to buy it separately as dlc you can do that, if you decide you want to become an ESO Plus member, then this will come with ESO Plus, and I think thats one of the cool things, so for people who still like kind of the model that goes with subscription, the dlc will absolutely support that, here you can see some work we've done with Clockwork City. So there's a lot of cool places that people are going to want to visit and open up and there's multiple ways to get to these areas, and its basically just allowing people who want the option of how they want the dlc, how they want to pay for it, it's giving them more option.