One you get Emp it is easier to retain the AP lead and it's fun as ***, so if RL permits you the time why would you not try and hold onto it for the campaign cycle?Emperorship has become a monopoly for a select few per campaign who stop at nothing to retain
What's the point of posting a topic if you are not permitting dissenting opinions? You just want everyone to pat you on the back and say "oh my god you are so wise"?you all know it is true so don't bother denying it.
So ridiculously untrue, why buy it when you can just nightcap it?If you want emperor, you have to buy it.
Somewhat true, lets examine how you propose to change that...The integrity of the game and the achievement is gone, just a hollow title now.
Oh.... so to make it less hollow you propose to give it to even more people (multiple dethroning and thronings will result in a new Emp every single time). What would be super hollow is only holding Emp for a few hours before you have to log off and needing to start a new character to get it again. What about first time Emps, you expect them to know how to rebuild their toon for Emp when they've never experienced anything like that before?I feel to undo the scam and sham of Emperorship is to make it attainable only once per player, after that a player still gets rank rewards worthy of their position, but are ineligible for emperor.
Why pay when you can nightcap it?Otherwise prepare to either pay for it, or forget about trying.
Multi faction guilds take turns boosting members to Emperor by seniority or to "girls" who send nudes to higher ranked guildies.
The integrity of the game and the achievement is gone, just a hollow title now.
What about first time Emps, you expect them to know how to rebuild their toon for Emp when they've never experienced anything like that before?
Publius_Scipio wrote: »For a long time emperorship has been reserved for guilds who pass it around between their members. A year or two ago Sypher attempted it on his stream and failed because there were elves in the campaign on his own alliance had it out for him.
You need time, AP rank, and all the keeps required. And it is so much easier when you have a group of people carrying you to the throne.
That's probably why many don't care about being emperor nor care who else is emperor. Personally I only cared about the campaign win, which doesn't require emperor.
Emperorship has become a monopoly for a select few per campaign who stop at nothing to retain, you all know it is true so don't bother denying it. If you want emperor, you have to buy it. The integrity of the game and the achievement is gone, just a hollow title now. I feel to undo the scam and sham of Emperorship is to make it attainable only once per player, after that a player still gets rank rewards worthy of their position, but are ineligible for emperor. Otherwise prepare to either pay for it, or forget about trying.
What started this post for me, I have a guildmates going for emperor. I don't have the time for it myself, but go in and try to help when I'm on. He is the number 3 spot. Number 1 and 2 have boosted themselves high enough and have enough guild behind them he won't pass them. Having spent so much time in he knows when the 1 and 2 are off. Some enemy players came in and started flipping a keep so we diced to wait and let them flip then between 3 of us we felt we could flip it back and at least crown him for a night. Some of number 1s guild came on and defended. Ok, that's fine, but then started accusing my guildmates who hasn't boosted of cheating and working with the enemy alliances.
The next afternoon the same thing happened. We don't boost but are getting accused of cheating by our own alliance. They said it was their campaign, if we wanted emperor it was 250k for each of us there. We said screw you of course and my guildmate is continuing to work at it for the too then rewards if nothing else.
We don't have the guildpower to push back on it, but to me, when you encounter such well crappy behavior from your own alliance who still call him a cheat and are still boosting, it's kind of angering.