Ilmarthethief wrote: »I honestly have no idea why people have such a big problem with crowncrates ._.
Have you played a game with rng crates? I have played many. Production of dlc becomes non existent, new items that are desired end up in the crates, and future content (housing in SWTOR as an example) is not enjoyable because of the crates.
Not to mention it is a disrespectful practice to rip off their customers. it might be a crazy concept for some, but people would rather purchase things with a fixed price.
Damn, when " Production of dlc becomes non existent, new items that are desired end up in the crates, and future content (housing in SWTOR as an example) is not enjoyable because of the crates" will happen I will quit this game too.
Unless it happened - I'm fine with crates.
How happened you are still alive - we all gonna die, so why bother waiting for imminent end? And it ALWAYS ends like this, no exceptions...
Stop whining.
I get it. You don't think these are bad. From my experience in other games they will ruin my fun. I will just move on. Thanks for your very informative input. Enjoy your crates.
ZOS is doing the same thing many MMO's have done, so why are you acting like I'm crazy for comparing them. You aren't giving any useful input on how these are a good thing. Constructive criticism of someone's position is helpful, personal attack aren't.
What i don´t get is: Why is the aquisition a problem for you under the presupposition that the content you desire most likely would not exist through direct purchase at all - because it would not be profitable to create it.
Would you rather have the items not exist at all than having them subsidized with the crates as a buisness model?
Many of these items have existed for quite some time. They just never put them on the store. I also don't think these are being introduced because they are desperate for money. Instead they are observing how much money other MMO's have made by throwing exclusives in rng crates. The gaming industry has been using these more frequently and likely for a reason. Greed. i am not willing to pay hundreds for one hairstyle and body marking they made over 3 months ago. I would however pay $10 each.
This system is not one of desperation but greed.
Sorry. Yes I would rather they didn't exist at all. To me they might as well not. IRL I am a craftsman. I take pride in my work and deliver a quality product for a price that makes sense. Never in my industry could my company pull something like this and retain a customer. Reputation is everything.Ilmarthethief wrote: »I honestly have no idea why people have such a big problem with crowncrates ._.
Have you played a game with rng crates? I have played many. Production of dlc becomes non existent, new items that are desired end up in the crates, and future content (housing in SWTOR as an example) is not enjoyable because of the crates.
Not to mention it is a disrespectful practice to rip off their customers. it might be a crazy concept for some, but people would rather purchase things with a fixed price.
Damn, when " Production of dlc becomes non existent, new items that are desired end up in the crates, and future content (housing in SWTOR as an example) is not enjoyable because of the crates" will happen I will quit this game too.
Unless it happened - I'm fine with crates.
How happened you are still alive - we all gonna die, so why bother waiting for imminent end? And it ALWAYS ends like this, no exceptions...
Stop whining.
I get it. You don't think these are bad. From my experience in other games they will ruin my fun. I will just move on. Thanks for your very informative input. Enjoy your crates.
ZOS is doing the same thing many MMO's have done, so why are you acting like I'm crazy for comparing them. You aren't giving any useful input on how these are a good thing. Constructive criticism of someone's position is helpful, personal attack aren't.
What i don´t get is: Why is the aquisition a problem for you under the presupposition that the content you desire most likely would not exist through direct purchase at all - because it would not be profitable to create it.
Would you rather have the items not exist at all than having them subsidized with the crates as a buisness model?
Many of these items have existed for quite some time. They just never put them on the store. I also don't think these are being introduced because they are desperate for money. Instead they are observing how much money other MMO's have made by throwing exclusives in rng crates. The gaming industry has been using these more frequently and likely for a reason. Greed. i am not willing to pay hundreds for one hairstyle and body marking they made over 3 months ago. I would however pay $10 each.
This system is not one of desperation but greed.
How would you know if they were not created months ago in preparation for the crates? And even if they were not - how would you like to fund further creation of lore/roleplay/vanity items?
Ofc a working and successful buisness model gets adapted. You know why they don´t put it in the store for 10$ each? Because it would get an outcry and possibly even bad press if ZOS were to charge the equivalent of 10 dollars for a hairstyle or body marking.
Also they would probably not sell too many of those.
It´s nice that you personally would buy those. But most people would not - while on the other hand you might not buy crates (or will anyway) while a lot more people might be inclined to buy a cheaper crate with multiple possible items to draw from.
I simply think it´s not cost-efficient to list every item seperately only to have very specific players buy specific items.
Also thanks for not answering my question at all. :P
People do realise crates are optional right? They only contains mounts, pets and hats so have no bearng on the game.
Strange reason to stop eso plus or outright quit like some people are saying.
I probably won't buy any though.
Lieblingsjunge wrote: »Can't live without Crafting Bags.
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »I'm saving my cancellation for when the Crates actually hit, to make the message clearer to marketing or whoever happens to be in charge of driving the Crate mess. I also plan on taking a week-long vacation from ESO at that time.
I'll miss the Crafting Bags (so useful!) but I survived since early access without them, I'll manage again. I have enough Crowns saved up to keep me in DLC for at least a little while without having to buy more, especially if the DLCs continue to be lacking.
Poll: Have you cancelled ESO+ because of Crown Crates
I simply think it´s not cost-efficient to list every item seperately only to have very specific players buy specific items.
Cancelling subs as a protest move has never been effective in the past; I don't see any reason it will work now.
Pay them, don't pay them, they don't care, the new players who buy their crates will give them a lot more money than your measly $15/month.
It doesn't affect your gameplay. Not everyone plays for the same reasons you do.The game has like over 100 really game breaking issues, and people are hating on those box. I MEAN THOSE BOXES, they don't even affect gameplay at all, they optional, you don't have to buy them, you know?
Btw, you know what? Now I can understand Molag Bal, if I was a demiprince of other plane I would totally want to destroy Nirn too in order to get rid of you guys.
It doesn't affect your gameplay. Not everyone plays for the same reasons you do.The game has like over 100 really game breaking issues, and people are hating on those box. I MEAN THOSE BOXES, they don't even affect gameplay at all, they optional, you don't have to buy them, you know?
Btw, you know what? Now I can understand Molag Bal, if I was a demiprince of other plane I would totally want to destroy Nirn too in order to get rid of you guys.
It doesn't affect your gameplay. Not everyone plays for the same reasons you do.The game has like over 100 really game breaking issues, and people are hating on those box. I MEAN THOSE BOXES, they don't even affect gameplay at all, they optional, you don't have to buy them, you know?
Btw, you know what? Now I can understand Molag Bal, if I was a demiprince of other plane I would totally want to destroy Nirn too in order to get rid of you guys.
It doesn't affect your gameplay. Not everyone plays for the same reasons you do.The game has like over 100 really game breaking issues, and people are hating on those box. I MEAN THOSE BOXES, they don't even affect gameplay at all, they optional, you don't have to buy them, you know?
Btw, you know what? Now I can understand Molag Bal, if I was a demiprince of other plane I would totally want to destroy Nirn too in order to get rid of you guys.
I'm talking about THE GAMEPLAY, not your in-game experience or mine. What does that mean? It means that those boxes are purely and only cosmetics, they don't affect anything in term of game mechanics, not a single thing of it.
You don't like them, okay, whatever, but hating on them like you guys are doing? IMHO, hating on something that is purely cosmetical, optional, and have no effect on the game mechanics is, at least, peculiar.