vamp_emily wrote: »
It is not the fact that you guys won the last campaign.. congrats! But it is the way it happened, the population gap is huge. We can give you a tough fight but you have so many players that you can easily cripple us by sending 10 people to an undefended keep while our alliance is going head to head with your zerg.
It is kind of like this:
AD ( 5 players ) jump on DC ( 1 player ), spams him till he dies. Then celebrates and says "We got skills, we won the campaign!".
DC against the AD zerg be like:
vamp_emily wrote: »It was suppose to mean, in the end DC will be the soul survivor.
vamp_emily wrote: »AD wins a campaign once and now we supposedly killed BWB. Haha.
It is not the fact that you guys won the last campaign.. congrats! But it is the way it happened, the population gap is huge. We can give you a tough fight but you have so many players that you can easily cripple us by sending 10 people to an undefended keep while our alliance is going head to head with your zerg.
It is kind of like this:
AD ( 5 players ) jump on DC ( 1 player ), spams him till he dies. Then celebrates and says "We got skills, we won the campaign!".
As far as you guys taking our Tri-keeps, It is what it is, but just don't come on here crying when we have an Emp that does the same.
In the end you will all die!
#DC-No1
gw2only1b14_ESO wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »
I dont wanna know where you had that Banana....
Valen_Byte wrote: »So when Dc sends a full group+ to a keep its an 'Alliance' but when AD does it, it's a zerg. Oh the hypocrisies never stop do they .
vamp_emily wrote: »Valen_Byte wrote: »So when Dc sends a full group+ to a keep its an 'Alliance' but when AD does it, it's a zerg. Oh the hypocrisies never stop do they .
ZERG is "Defeat enemy by outnumbering rather than strategy or skill"
When I was referring to our Alliance it was like 24 players at max VS AD zerg 40 plus players.
Valen_Byte wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »Valen_Byte wrote: »So when Dc sends a full group+ to a keep its an 'Alliance' but when AD does it, it's a zerg. Oh the hypocrisies never stop do they .
ZERG is "Defeat enemy by outnumbering rather than strategy or skill"
When I was referring to our Alliance it was like 24 players at max VS AD zerg 40 plus players.
Maybe in your head there are never more than 24 dc players in one place, but thats just in your head. Im going to start taking screenshots for you every time I see more than 24 dc in one place. Shouldn't take too long.
When Dc is literally all in one place and we know it, we do send a small group to cap an undefended keep. That IS strategy/skill. Not our fault you will sit there and let us take your stuff.
vamp_emily wrote: »Valen_Byte wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »Valen_Byte wrote: »So when Dc sends a full group+ to a keep its an 'Alliance' but when AD does it, it's a zerg. Oh the hypocrisies never stop do they .
ZERG is "Defeat enemy by outnumbering rather than strategy or skill"
When I was referring to our Alliance it was like 24 players at max VS AD zerg 40 plus players.
Maybe in your head there are never more than 24 dc players in one place, but thats just in your head. Im going to start taking screenshots for you every time I see more than 24 dc in one place. Shouldn't take too long.
When Dc is literally all in one place and we know it, we do send a small group to cap an undefended keep. That IS strategy/skill. Not our fault you will sit there and let us take your stuff.
Maybe.. just maybe you like to disagree on everything i say.
I am sure you didn't know what the definition of a zerg was that is why I posted it.
I guess this thread and the one before it got long enough to illustrate Godwin's law.
ur ss is broken image @WhitePawPrints
vamp_emily wrote: »There is also something very off about the gaps between the highest ranking player and the second highest ranking player. Below is an example of that. When a player has 3x has much AP as the next highest ranking player, then there is something suspicious going on there.
vamp_emily wrote: »I do find it strange but then I haven't seen him cheat. He seems like a nice guy.
vamp_emily wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »There is also something very off about the gaps between the highest ranking player and the second highest ranking player. Below is an example of that. When a player has 3x has much AP as the next highest ranking player, then there is something suspicious going on there.
I just want to comment on this.
I am not saying anyone cheated, the highest ranking player might be a super ninja AP machine.
I logged in the morning when the campaign started, and the only real action was at Bleakers for most the day . The highest ranking player was not at Bleakers from what I seen but his AP gap kept on getting larger. So the question is: If the only fight was at Bleakers, where was the top ranked player and what was he doing to make so much noticeable AP?
The thing that was kind of suspicious is all the top players were basically in the same AP range. Except for no. 1 spot.
My personal opinion is, he logged in 6 hours before we did and was collecting AP. I don't understand how his AP gap was getting larger once we logged on and started collecting AP. The only fight was at Bleakers and he wasn't there for the most part or not there at all. So the only thing I can think of he was repairing walls.
I do find it strange but then I haven't seen him cheat. He seems like a nice guy.