BalerionBlackDread wrote: »"at this time you have suffered no loss to deserve compensation"
The 70 cp at launch is in no way meant to be a compensation for loss. It is meant to be a bonus so people can jump in and see how the cs works. In fact, no one who plays this game and progresses their respective characters loses a damn thing. You and I and everyone else who plays this game gets rewarded in levels, gear, gold, items, experience etc. for everything we do. As a VR14 I don't have to 'suffer a loss' to be rewarded those 70cp, I will be given them because zos feels I deserve them because I am VR14. If you want 70 cp get off your ass and go level, period.
You're not making sense. CS launches we can both equally earn CP, at this time you have suffered no loss to deserve compensation. You still have your VR, You still have your VR gear, you still have everything you had the day before. Nothing is changed except now you can earn CP you still have everything else. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for you to then receive 70 cp at that time (which you didn't earn and you didn't lose anything so don't deserve compensation at that time) allowing you even greater power differential compared to everyone the day before.
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »"at this time you have suffered no loss to deserve compensation"
The 70 cp at launch is in no way meant to be a compensation for loss. It is meant to be a bonus so people can jump in and see how the cs works. In fact, no one who plays this game and progresses their respective characters loses a damn thing. You and I and everyone else who plays this game gets rewarded in levels, gear, gold, items, experience etc. for everything we do. As a VR14 I don't have to 'suffer a loss' to be rewarded those 70cp, I will be given them because zos feels I deserve them because I am VR14. If you want 70 cp get off your ass and go level, period.
If it is meant as a bonus then why doesn't everyone get the same bonus? It makes perfect sense to give a bonus only to the people who need it the least...common that's a crock and you know it.
You're not making sense. CS launches we can both equally earn CP, at this time you have suffered no loss to deserve compensation. You still have your VR, You still have your VR gear, you still have everything you had the day before. Nothing is changed except now you can earn CP you still have everything else. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for you to then receive 70 cp at that time (which you didn't earn and you didn't lose anything so don't deserve compensation at that time) allowing you even greater power differential compared to everyone the day before.
I make perfect sense.
Maybe I should spell it out for you:
At CS Launch as you propose:
You: VR1 0CP
Me: VR14 0CP (70 waiting to be given after VR disappears; having already earned more than 5 million more experience beyond VR14, as well as having multiple alternate veteran characters which total maybe 8 million exp; a total of 27 million exp)
A week later
You: VR4 20CP
Me: VR14 0CP (because i haven't logged in)
2 weeks later
You: VR7 35CP
Me: VR14 0CP (still haven't logged in)
3 weeks later
You: VR 10 50CP
Me: VR14 0CP (quite a long break)
4 weeks later
You: VR 13 65CP
Me: VR14 0CP (just washing back to shore after the deadly cruise tragedy)
5 weeks later
You: VR14 70CP (you just earned your last 200k to fill out VR14)
Me: VR14 0CP (just released from hospital with orders to not excite myself, just sleep)
6 weeks later
You: VR14 80CP (gained 3 million more exp due to a long weekend)
Me: VR14 0CP (logging in intermittently to chat with guild)
7 weeks later
You: VR14 90CP
Me: VR14 5CP (have to wait for Veteran ranks to get the other 70 but I managed to get an extra million experience)
8 weeks later (Maybe VR removed)
You: 100CP (with only 20 million experience earned)
Me: 85CP (with 30 million experience earned)
9 weeks later (I've decided to stop playing for a bit and you managed to finally catch up in experience and content tackled)
You: 150CP (with 30 million experience earned)
Me: 85CP (with 30 million experience earned)
Still seem fair? Reasonable? If it does, we are done discussing this because you aren't understanding the long term implications of what VR14's are giving up) If we played at the same time, it would seem unfair to you, but it would be actually fair.
Tip: It doesn't take long to level up your veteran ranks if you stick to one character and do Cadwell's silver and gold. I made a vet rank about every 8 hours and that was mostly spent fooling around.
Then the entire time that we are playing side by side you have double strength from the combination of your 70 cp bonus and the VR14 bonuses which is unfair to all those who did not get the 70 CP.
Well VR Ranks have 2 advantages:
- Attribute points
- Better Gear attributes.
Maybe the attribute points that we received for the VR ranks should be removed?
We used to gain attribute points up to VR1 and after that none. This was changed a couple of patches ago, why not revert it in 1.6 so that the void between VR1 and VR14 isn't as large till Update 7 drops & removes VR ranks and lowers armor level?
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »BalerionBlackDread wrote: »"at this time you have suffered no loss to deserve compensation"
The 70 cp at launch is in no way meant to be a compensation for loss. It is meant to be a bonus so people can jump in and see how the cs works. In fact, no one who plays this game and progresses their respective characters loses a damn thing. You and I and everyone else who plays this game gets rewarded in levels, gear, gold, items, experience etc. for everything we do. As a VR14 I don't have to 'suffer a loss' to be rewarded those 70cp, I will be given them because zos feels I deserve them because I am VR14. If you want 70 cp get off your ass and go level, period.
If it is meant as a bonus then why doesn't everyone get the same bonus? It makes perfect sense to give a bonus only to the people who need it the least...common that's a crock and you know it.
It is a bonus because I played and leveled my toon to VR14.You don't get the bonus because you're not VR14. Bonus has nothing to do with need, it has to do with performance. It is why other vet lvls get compensated as well, based on performance.
In what industry, in what universe do people get bonuses based on need? If I get a christmas bonus for going above and beyond in my work, and you don't because you just did the bare minimum, would you decry my bonus?
TequilaFire wrote: »But you can still earn all those bonuses by playing.
Stop crying, get off your butt, and get to VR14 before the update goes live. Simple as that.
/thread
RDMyers65b14_ESO wrote: »Please, no more delays for 1.6. That is, unless you want to buy me the bank upgrades. Any change now would delay the patch.
Then the entire time that we are playing side by side you have double strength from the combination of your 70 cp bonus and the VR14 bonuses which is unfair to all those who did not get the 70 CP.
While you are playing side by side you are also having Veteran rank bonuses...
I don't think you know how little difference there is between a vet rank 1 and vet rank 14... it's not as impactful as you might assume. The only exception being gear, which is where the real disparity has always and will always lay it's head.
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »Ok OP let's say you get what you want and the 70cp is calculated but delayed until 1.7. All the while during 1.6 everyone is earning cp's. When 1.7 hits all those who had to wait for their 70cp will now have probably 100-150 cp and now they will get 70 more, and they will have all skill points that they had (or more), they will have all the gear that they had (or better gear) and they will have all the skills/morphs that they had.
Now, all the players that you're championing with this topic, where do you think they'll be? They will be still under V14, still not have all the skill points, still not have all the gear and maybe have 50-100 cp's, then 1.7 hits and they still don't get the 70cp. So, assuming all of this how will it be any damn different if the initial 70 is pushed back?
It is a bonus because I played and leveled my toon to VR14.You don't get the bonus because you're not VR14. Bonus has nothing to do with need, it has to do with performance. It is why other vet lvls get compensated as well, based on performance.
In what industry, in what universe do people get bonuses based on need? If I get a christmas bonus for going above and beyond in my work, and you don't because you just did the bare minimum, would you decry my bonus?
If it is the same then why are you against waiting till 1.7?
What do you mean it it's the same? I was trying to warn you, if it happens the way you want, you'll just be here again when 1.7 launches saying the same ***, only the gap will be wider.
Because I want to have some points right away to test the system, to see how respec goes, to what impact 70 passive will have on my immediate gameplay, to feel what it is like to not be knocked off my horse so easy (War Mount skill), to have some points to play around with, BECAUSE I LEVELED TO V14 AND ZOS SAYS I GET 70 DAMN POINTS.
My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that when VR is removed the gear will be scaled down to level 50 (with the Zos statement 'the former VR gear MAY have an extra effect from the level 50 gear.
When VR is removed I will still have all my skill points, all my attribute points (I'm not 100% sure about gear) and have all the skills/morphs/passives that I had before, so basically as I understand it, going from VR14 to lvl 50 will just be a nameplate change.
If you are willing to have all your gear scaled now in exchange for the CP now then the argument is less but not completely gone. Still the correct action is to give the compensation/bonus (whatever you want to call it) when VR are removed and not before.
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »If it is the same then why are you against waiting till 1.7?
My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that when VR is removed the gear will be scaled down to level 50 (with the Zos statement 'the former VR gear MAY have an extra effect from the level 50 gear.
If you are willing to have all your gear scaled now in exchange for the CP now then the argument is less but not completely gone. Still the correct action is to give the compensation/bonus (whatever you want to call it) when VR are removed and not before.
This is because you're still under the completely ignorant assumption that this a compensation for loss situation, IT IS NOT!
Those with the most free time will always have the strongest avatars. What's the big deal?
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »If it is the same then why are you against waiting till 1.7?
My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that when VR is removed the gear will be scaled down to level 50 (with the Zos statement 'the former VR gear MAY have an extra effect from the level 50 gear.
If you are willing to have all your gear scaled now in exchange for the CP now then the argument is less but not completely gone. Still the correct action is to give the compensation/bonus (whatever you want to call it) when VR are removed and not before.
This is because you're still under the completely ignorant assumption that this a compensation for loss situation, IT IS NOT!
If its not a compensation for loss then why not go back to the 30CP plan?
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »BalerionBlackDread wrote: »If it is the same then why are you against waiting till 1.7?
My understanding (and I could be wrong) is that when VR is removed the gear will be scaled down to level 50 (with the Zos statement 'the former VR gear MAY have an extra effect from the level 50 gear.
If you are willing to have all your gear scaled now in exchange for the CP now then the argument is less but not completely gone. Still the correct action is to give the compensation/bonus (whatever you want to call it) when VR are removed and not before.
This is because you're still under the completely ignorant assumption that this a compensation for loss situation, IT IS NOT!
If its not a compensation for loss then why not go back to the 30CP plan?
You're looking at this bass ackwards. It is more like a compensation for accomplishment. The 30 cp were to be given to everyone, no matter there efforts (as long as they had V1). The people who had a V14 or more (who had put more effort in, accomplished more) wanted more points commensurate with their accomplishments. Now we have a system that recognizes each players accomplishments and rewards them accordingly. Even sub veteran players will have the reward of enlightenment to help them 'catch up'.
Sounds a lot like you want a "no child left behind" policy for ESO. A policy that didn't work out too well either.
Would you also like those of us who have millions of gold to stop earning gold so others can catch up to the amount we have?
Riiight. That's exactly what he said
Would it kill you to wait for the rank-to-CP conversion until veteran ranks are actually removed? The OP makes a very valid point. If this conversion goes live in Update 6, VR14s will basically get even more bonuses compared to a VR1, for no real reason.
Sounds a lot like you want a "no child left behind" policy for ESO. A policy that didn't work out too well either.
Would you also like those of us who have millions of gold to stop earning gold so others can catch up to the amount we have?
Riiight. That's exactly what he said
Would it kill you to wait for the rank-to-CP conversion until veteran ranks are actually removed? The OP makes a very valid point. If this conversion goes live in Update 6, VR14s will basically get even more bonuses compared to a VR1, for no real reason.
Ya... forget not just the extra time leveling, completing Caldwell's, beating your head against a wall in Craglorn... but also other things like taking the time not just to level a craft to 50, but all that time researching and collecting Tannis to make a set of Purple/Gold VR14 gear that will essentially be made into VR1....
So VR14 complained and put 100s of repeat threads on the forums because 'they weren't given enough freebies?'
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »So VR14 complained and put 100s of repeat threads on the forums because 'they weren't given enough freebies?'
Where does the idea of 'freebie' come in? To continue with your earlier economic analogy: If I go to my job, clock in, work 10 hours, then get paid time and half for that extra 2 hours, is that time and a half a freebie? Then to expand: I worked my 10 hour day, but you only worked and 8 hour day, should you then be able to collect that time and a half pay even though you didn't work the overtime?
BalerionBlackDread wrote: »So VR14 complained and put 100s of repeat threads on the forums because 'they weren't given enough freebies?'
Where does the idea of 'freebie' come in? To continue with your earlier economic analogy: If I go to my job, clock in, work 10 hours, then get paid time and half for that extra 2 hours, is that time and a half a freebie? Then to expand: I worked my 10 hour day, but you only worked and 8 hour day, should you then be able to collect that time and a half pay even though you didn't work the overtime?
So if I level to VR 14 in a few months (after this is all implemented) then you will give me the same thing?