cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »After the short interlude regarding the blue scroll things are back to business as usual it seems. Purple teams 1 and 2 attacking AD with all their forces, peace and prosperity in the northern parts of the map, minus a handful of habitual farmers at Bleaker's.
Oh no! Orange alliance!
Seriously, all factions are ganged up on when it's strategically smart. There is no way AD would have held the lead the first 20 days without the constant "green alliance" against the Ebonheart Pact either.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Difference is we are still fighting reds at BRK there rather than just peace but I don't have a problem with it
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Difference is we are still fighting reds at BRK there rather than just peace but I don't have a problem with it
Well, it looks like this now, and yet you guys are crying about your imaginary purple alliance.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Hmm better come home and see what I can do to fix it then
While it should not be the goal, when a game is as buggy as this negativity is inevitable.DlSTORTlON wrote: »Lava_Croft wrote: »Can we just agree together that blaming a certain faction for lag and rollbacks is not just really dumb, it's also counterproductive and creates an atmosphere of negativity directed towards factions instead of negativity directed towards the people we pay money to deliver us a working product.
Agree, but perhaps instead of negatively directing it towards ZOS, we should do it positively?
cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »After the short interlude regarding the blue scroll things are back to business as usual it seems. Purple teams 1 and 2 attacking AD with all their forces, peace and prosperity in the northern parts of the map, minus a handful of habitual farmers at Bleaker's.
heng14rwb17_ESO wrote: »Spell crafting is needed to nuke the purple alliance.
Must be the purple alliance that sieged Glademist, Warden and Rayles tonight and transported the Ni-Mohk scroll to Arrius, huh? I think there was a glitch on my map though, because it was showing yellows pushing towards and attacking Rayles while some red colour was at Glademist and Warden.
Must be the purple alliance that sieged Glademist, Warden and Rayles tonight and transported the Ni-Mohk scroll to Arrius, huh? I think there was a glitch on my map though, because it was showing yellows pushing towards and attacking Rayles while some red colour was at Glademist and Warden.
We weren't sieging it was humanitarian aid who entered your keeps, delivered supplies and took scroll for safe keeping. We have an alliance, we don't fight each other, as we know if we kill each other we get minus AP.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Must be the purple alliance that sieged Glademist, Warden and Rayles tonight and transported the Ni-Mohk scroll to Arrius, huh? I think there was a glitch on my map though, because it was showing yellows pushing towards and attacking Rayles while some red colour was at Glademist and Warden.
We weren't sieging it was humanitarian aid who entered your keeps, delivered supplies and took scroll for safe keeping. We have an alliance, we don't fight each other, as we know if we kill each other we get minus AP.
Finally the truth comes out!
Lava_Croft wrote: »The beauty of a device like 'an alliance against us' is that you can blame it for your own misfortune. Feels a lot better than recognizing your own missteps and shortcomings.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Agreed damn those purples making us put scrolls in Alessia not Fare!
Also those that don't replace forward camps are all purple supporters.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Lava_Croft wrote: »The beauty of a device like 'an alliance against us' is that you can blame it for your own misfortune. Feels a lot better than recognizing your own missteps and shortcomings.
Agreed damn those purples making us put scrolls in Alessia not Fare!
Also those that don't replace forward camps are all purple supporters.
mike.gaziotisb16_ESO wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Lava_Croft wrote: »The beauty of a device like 'an alliance against us' is that you can blame it for your own misfortune. Feels a lot better than recognizing your own missteps and shortcomings.
Agreed damn those purples making us put scrolls in Alessia not Fare!
Also those that don't replace forward camps are all purple supporters.
You'll have a lot more camps not being replaced when low Alliance Rank players cant replace them any more. Damn you Brian Wheeler and your silly ideas.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »mike.gaziotisb16_ESO wrote: »Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Lava_Croft wrote: »The beauty of a device like 'an alliance against us' is that you can blame it for your own misfortune. Feels a lot better than recognizing your own missteps and shortcomings.
Agreed damn those purples making us put scrolls in Alessia not Fare!
Also those that don't replace forward camps are all purple supporters.
You'll have a lot more camps not being replaced when low Alliance Rank players cant replace them any more. Damn you Brian Wheeler and your silly ideas.
Its ok though because trolls don't put in effort to troll so they will never just go farm rank 6.
Anyone on Thornblade able to update esostats.com so us poor [snip] at work can see how the campaign is going?
mike.gaziotisb16_ESO wrote: »