They do it every time. Nothing new to be surprised about. Its just AD as usual, being pathetic.I think last week DC had a 12k lead over bananas no? Or was it not on thorn?
Bananas, I don't blame you for the low pop scoring, it's stupid but not your fault. However, bragging on here that you've won when clearly AD didn't deserve the win this time is a bit disrespectful don't you think?
Lol the golden alliance would gank up on DC, thats for damn sure :PLegendaryMage wrote: »We should settle this war the old way. 1vs1vs1 and last man standing wins, like one of those trailers.
How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »You are wrong. Bananas got more than 10.000 in one night because of low population abuse. Not counting the other days where they don't got 1600 points per tick, just 1200 or so.
daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »And again:
pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »You are wrong. Bananas got more than 10.000 in one night because of low population abuse. Not counting the other days where they don't got 1600 points per tick, just 1200 or so.
10000 in one night, lol.
Actually I think it was 20000, in fact lets make it [insert random number here].
dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
No clue what Broadmoor is, but I agree on the general point. Same applies to ZOS intentionally giving AD an advantage - Why would they care about the score in one EU campaign specifically ?
No, it was a bit more than 10000 in this night. This is not "lol", this is abusing and cheating. But hey, they need to do this several times during the last campaigns because they are bad players. Deal with it, it's fact.pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »You are wrong. Bananas got more than 10.000 in one night because of low population abuse. Not counting the other days where they don't got 1600 points per tick, just 1200 or so.
10000 in one night, lol.
Actually I think it was 20000, in fact lets make it [insert random number here].
Thudunblundur wrote: »daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »And again:
This was the night. There you are having already picked up a few thousand points. By the next morning you were in the lead.
pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »1.6 is not before mid - end January earliest I'd guess, by which time we (AD) will likely get more of that crappy bonus...
I feel bad for DC who had a much larger gap to us than what it's now, makes all effort quite pointless really
huh? AD are within a 1000 points now having been 12000 points down a few days ago. A very small amount of that came from the low pop bonus. The rest has just been a lot of effort and coordination on ADs part.
pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »You are wrong. Bananas got more than 10.000 in one night because of low population abuse. Not counting the other days where they don't got 1600 points per tick, just 1200 or so.
10000 in one night, lol.
Actually I think it was 20000, in fact lets make it [insert random number here].
You can "lol" all you want, but the 10.000 point grab in one night was documented. Get your facts straight before dismissing other people's arguments.
Thudunblundur wrote: »Too stupid to bother with. Well documented in many places, not denied by any yellow player apart from you, and that screenshot is from the night it happened about 3 in the morning. Sorry, you are just wrong.
cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
No clue what Broadmoor is.
dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
No clue what Broadmoor is.
Loony bin. Nut house. Asylum. Mental house etc etc.
cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
No clue what Broadmoor is, but I agree on the general point. Same applies to ZOS intentionally giving AD an advantage - Why would they care about the score in one EU campaign specifically ?
I think it's far-fetched to believe ZOS are actively aiding one faction.
That said, and even though I'm not 100% certain that there's exploiting going on, the facts don't paint AD in a good light. The truth is that this one faction has CONSISTENTLY gotten the low-population bonus during or after a complete map grab, giving them otherwise unobtainable scores. This wasn't a one-off. It has happened multiple times during the last 2 campaigns at least.
cazlonb16_ESO wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »Being convinced that players in AD are the only ones who know secrets like they were the Illumanati is paranoia worthy of a visit to Broadmoor.
No clue what Broadmoor is, but I agree on the general point. Same applies to ZOS intentionally giving AD an advantage - Why would they care about the score in one EU campaign specifically ?
I think it's far-fetched to believe ZOS are actively aiding one faction.
That said, and even though I'm not 100% certain that there's exploiting going on, the facts don't paint AD in a good light. The truth is that this one faction has CONSISTENTLY gotten the low-population bonus during or after a complete map grab, giving them otherwise unobtainable scores. This wasn't a one-off. It has happened multiple times during the last 2 campaigns at least.
Didn't you know?! Nobody on AD-Side is a real player, we're all devs in disguise and try to save our egos by playing with the points 'cause you guys are so much better than us! /sarcasm