Both times we got that big bonus it lasted only 2 ticks. So instead of getting +399 per tick as we should, we got around 1500. 4 times.Thudunblundur wrote: »How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
10,000+ points in one night. 3000+ points in 2 hours. And that's just the big ones. And you try to claim good play? Heh.
Thudunblundur wrote: »You gained the last day's score while 2 bars above the other 2 factions as most have now left in disgust at your collective behavior. Your excuses and self justifications are pathetic. You have won the last three campaigns because of the low population glitch.
Both times we got that big bonus it lasted only 2 ticks. So instead of getting +399 per tick as we should, we got around 1500. 4 times.Thudunblundur wrote: »How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
10,000+ points in one night. 3000+ points in 2 hours. And that's just the big ones. And you try to claim good play? Heh.
(1500-400)*4 = 4400 scoring points.
As it only lasted 2 ticks both times (2.2k more than we should have gotten, not 3k, as we owned the whole map) it would take 17 hours of full map possession to get 7k scoring points. 17 hours... pretty long night, don't you think???
Maybe show us your prove?
I don't say that the low pop bonus wouldn't be *** or anything. What I am saying is that AD would have won nevertheless. We are leading with more than 7k which is more than we got from low pop bonus.
AbraXuSeXile wrote: »Both times we got that big bonus it lasted only 2 ticks. So instead of getting +399 per tick as we should, we got around 1500. 4 times.Thudunblundur wrote: »How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
10,000+ points in one night. 3000+ points in 2 hours. And that's just the big ones. And you try to claim good play? Heh.
(1500-400)*4 = 4400 scoring points.
As it only lasted 2 ticks both times (2.2k more than we should have gotten, not 3k, as we owned the whole map) it would take 17 hours of full map possession to get 7k scoring points. 17 hours... pretty long night, don't you think???
Maybe show us your prove?
I don't say that the low pop bonus wouldn't be *** or anything. What I am saying is that AD would have won nevertheless. We are leading with more than 7k which is more than we got from low pop bonus.
Saying you would of won because you have a 7k lead is ridiculous claims.
But anyway your all boring and im too hungover to read all this crap.
Both times we got that big bonus it lasted only 2 ticks. So instead of getting +399 per tick as we should, we got around 1500. 4 times.Thudunblundur wrote: »How many points did AD from low score points in total?
As far as I remember we once got 2 ticks of 1400 instead of 399 and recently 2 ticks of 1500 instead of 399. This would 4200 points rewarded from low pop.
Considering was 12k behind DC and now is 6k in front, I think blaming it all on the low pop bonus is wrong.
Good job AD
10,000+ points in one night. 3000+ points in 2 hours. And that's just the big ones. And you try to claim good play? Heh.
(1500-400)*4 = 4400 scoring points.
As it only lasted 2 ticks both times (2.2k more than we should have gotten, not 3k, as we owned the whole map) it would take 17 hours of full map possession to get 7k scoring points. 17 hours... pretty long night, don't you think???
Maybe show us your prove?
I don't say that the low pop bonus wouldn't be *** or anything. What I am saying is that AD would have won nevertheless. We are leading with more than 7k which is more than we got from low pop bonus.
Lava_Croft wrote: »A quick glance on New Year's eve did confirm one thing: AD is the faction with the most nolifers. 3-bar population versus 1-bar for the other factions.
Lava_Croft wrote: »A quick glance on New Year's eve did confirm one thing: AD is the faction with the most nolifers. 3-bar population versus 1-bar for the other factions.
The way I see it, DC won the campaign, EP is second and AD is the joke faction.Lava_Croft wrote: »A quick glance on New Year's eve did confirm one thing: AD is the faction with the most nolifers. 3-bar population versus 1-bar for the other factions.
DC and EP might have lost the campaign, but the biggest losers are the elves who spent New Year's Eve playing versus walls and doors.
Lava_Croft wrote: »A quick glance on New Year's eve did confirm one thing: AD is the faction with the most nolifers. 3-bar population versus 1-bar for the other factions.
Lava_Croft wrote: »A quick glance on New Year's eve did confirm one thing: AD is the faction with the most nolifers. 3-bar population versus 1-bar for the other factions.
Lava_Croft wrote: »DC won the campaign, EP is second and AD is the joke faction.
Your 'exactly' only goes as far as the word 'exactly'. The rest is just gibberish to me.Lava_Croft wrote: »DC won the campaign, EP is second and AD is the joke faction.
Exactly. Those dumb yellow losers would never win campaign without low pop bonus, and as I understand this is actually repeating history - AD got kicked and loses campaign again and again, but then points are just handed them, which does not change fact that AD lost campaign.
So to sum up AD are just indesignartsandcrafts.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ace-ventura-quotes-loser.jpg
Lava_Croft wrote: »Your 'exactly' only goes as far as the word 'exactly'. The rest is just gibberish to me.
Or you can stop spreading nonsense. AD has won campaigns without the broken low population bonus, most AD aren't exactly happy with the broken low population bonus and all that people like you seem to want to accomplish is even more toxicity than already present.Lava_Croft wrote: »Your 'exactly' only goes as far as the word 'exactly'. The rest is just gibberish to me.
Then rise your reading skill or buy brain.
Lava_Croft wrote: »
Lava_Croft wrote: »
Fixed for ya
Wow Kris, you're not even AD.....
Some people like winning to the forums, just ignore them and keep being pathetic like us - AD
Lava_Croft wrote: »
So in other words you have no proof and have nothing to add.
Congratulations you been pwnd
Here we come to what I said previously - dumb yellow looser cant win without low pop bonus.
Hip hip hurray to DC that won campaign!Fixed for ya
Wow Kris, you're not even AD.....
Some people like winning to the forums, just ignore them and keep being pathetic like us - AD