Can we have an European Thornblade (EU) topic?

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

DaggerfallTradeMasters wrote: »

...
GL: AD-EP-DC

I approve of your score prediction

also if you mean roe whilst EP had faregyl your welcome for the fights was my group ^^ only lost it cause we went to fare to get it and couldn't get back in time... oh forward camps I miss you

Koensol

DaggerfallTradeMasters wrote: »

Nice lag train yesterday at Alessia 0_o anyways loved that AD got owned because of own lag

About all the discussions and stuff like that:
Grats AD on winning though some of you guys can stop bragging that much idk how it should have ended with out low pop perhaps you won perhaps not because lots of DC stopped playing last days...

Anyways there is no point in discussing this any further lets just all play this new campaign and have some fun!

GL: AD-EP-DC

Well, yesterday at least gave me some confidence in our numbers. DC really had quite some large groups being actively engaged in pvp. We just need to communicate better in terms of signaling an attack before a keep gets flagged. We should never have lost glademist to AD yesterday evening.

Oh and btw... That lagtrain was at roebeck. I remember asking in chat: "What's the status on roe?" The answer being: "LAG!"

DlSTORTlON

Peteris wrote: »

DlSTORTlON wrote: »

AD:

so we need photoshop non-existent success.

Yusuf wrote: »

Lets start ignoring toxic posts, this is one of the best threads on the forums and i don't wanna lose it.

I really, really, really like this post & thread.

DaggerfallTradeMasters

Koensol wrote: »

DaggerfallTradeMasters wrote: »

Nice lag train yesterday at Alessia 0_o anyways loved that AD got owned because of own lag

About all the discussions and stuff like that:
Grats AD on winning though some of you guys can stop bragging that much idk how it should have ended with out low pop perhaps you won perhaps not because lots of DC stopped playing last days...

Anyways there is no point in discussing this any further lets just all play this new campaign and have some fun!

GL: AD-EP-DC

Well, yesterday at least gave me some confidence in our numbers. DC really had quite some large groups being actively engaged in pvp. We just need to communicate better in terms of signaling an attack before a keep gets flagged. We should never have lost glademist to AD yesterday evening.

Oh and btw... That lagtrain was at roebeck. I remember asking in chat: "What's the status on roe?" The answer being: "LAG!"

Oo yeah i remember that stupid Templaroflight wrote that.
I liked how we yesterday sieged Roebeck to help the people at Ash and actually took it.

Koensol

DaggerfallTradeMasters wrote: »

Koensol wrote: »

DaggerfallTradeMasters wrote: »

Nice lag train yesterday at Alessia 0_o anyways loved that AD got owned because of own lag

About all the discussions and stuff like that:
Grats AD on winning though some of you guys can stop bragging that much idk how it should have ended with out low pop perhaps you won perhaps not because lots of DC stopped playing last days...

Anyways there is no point in discussing this any further lets just all play this new campaign and have some fun!

GL: AD-EP-DC

Well, yesterday at least gave me some confidence in our numbers. DC really had quite some large groups being actively engaged in pvp. We just need to communicate better in terms of signaling an attack before a keep gets flagged. We should never have lost glademist to AD yesterday evening.

Oh and btw... That lagtrain was at roebeck. I remember asking in chat: "What's the status on roe?" The answer being: "LAG!"

Oo yeah i remember that stupid Templaroflight wrote that.
I liked how we yesterday sieged Roebeck to help the people at Ash and actually took it.

Yup that was a good one. And now we have emp

bertenburnyb16_ESO

our randoms are just so.... randoming all the time

ow well, randoms gonna random

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

Yusuf

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

I joined PVP for an hour or so 2 days ago.... That means we'll have lowpop-bonus in 3 days since the system needs some time to realize my absence. :P

Peteris

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

Lava_Croft

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

I noticed the broken AD low pop bonus in Azura's Star last week...

Sanct16

Lava_Croft wrote: »

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

I noticed the broken AD low pop bonus in Azura's Star last week...

What was broken about it? Azura is EP dominated afaik; a low pop bonus seems legit. Dont play on azura usually.
I remember AD getting low score bonus while being #1 on Azura for multiple hours tho some weeks ago.

Lava_Croft

Sanct16 wrote: »

Lava_Croft wrote: »

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

Poor Thornblade EU topic getting ignored now there is nothing controversial to discuss...

Bring back low pop..

I noticed the broken AD low pop bonus in Azura's Star last week...

What was broken about it? Azura is EP dominated afaik; a low pop bonus seems legit. Dont play on azura usually.
I remember AD getting low score bonus while being #1 on Azura for multiple hours tho some weeks ago.

It was some silly high number, just like on TB.

Isbilen

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

Isbilen wrote: »

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

you know that its still new years holidays for some ? Not me, but some

Dalglish

Plus some of us go to work, with limited sleep haha!

pmn100b16_ESO

Isbilen wrote: »

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

Can't complain about low pop bonus, will complain about players playing.

heng14rwb17_ESO

pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »

Isbilen wrote: »

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

Can't complain about low pop bonus, will complain about players playing.

LOL
LMAO
LUIE

Isbilen

pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »

Isbilen wrote: »

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

Can't complain about low pop bonus, will complain about players playing.

I hope you understand how demotivating it is to wake up morning after morning to be greeted by the work of the unemployed yellow drone swarm. What happened to Haderus will happen to Thornblade eventually. No one wants to wake up with both their gates open and both scrolls gone, as is the situation for EP and DC right now.

And the reason why the low population bonus was complained about, is because it was and will be if you ever lose 1st place, applied even though your faction heavily outnumbers everyone else in off-hours, and is more often than not the first to lock and last to unlock.

pmn100b16_ESO

Isbilen wrote: »

pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »

Isbilen wrote: »

Looks like AD with their ridiculous amount of unemployed players has finally managed to create the Haderus 2.0 they've wanted for so long.

Can't complain about low pop bonus, will complain about players playing.

I hope you understand how demotivating it is to wake up morning after morning to be greeted by the work of the unemployed yellow drone swarm. What happened to Haderus will happen to Thornblade eventually. No one wants to wake up with both their gates open and both scrolls gone, as is the situation for EP and DC right now.

And the reason why the low population bonus was complained about, is because it was and will be if you ever lose 1st place, applied even though your faction heavily outnumbers everyone else in off-hours, and is more often than not the first to lock and last to unlock.

And the way to get back at them will be to insult them on the forum as being "unemployed drones". kk

Isbilen

pmn100b16_ESO wrote: »

And the way to get back at them will be to insult them on the forum as being "unemployed drones". kk

Have to find some way to let the frustration out when you're met with 200 insects and an emperor every time you try to take as much as a resource back.

AbraXuSeXile

Breaking the enemies spirit is the best way to win the war

VagabondAngel

AbraXuSeXile wrote: »

Breaking the enemies spirit is the best way to win the war

...and therein lies the problem. This isn't actually war, it's a game. One that, played this way, becomes less and less fun for all the gamers on the underside of the current banana boot.

I don't mind losing; I'm a (probably) averagely skilled player who sometimes wins and dies often. The winning of a campaign means little to me truth be told - it's only points on a meaningless scoreboard that I don't usually even look at... and some extra gold after 30 days (an amount so small I can farm it in less than a night.) I like a good fight - one in which I at least have a chance of survival. (Actually, killing the current emperor and his lacky outside Arrius last night, with the help of 2 NPC guards, was pretty fun )

What I do mind is a complete faceroll by a never ending train of bananas mimicking a horde of ants, destroying all in their path. One that also, once the map is taken, camps outside the gates of an enemy faction to make sure no-one from that faction can even join the game. And all to serve the egos of a few misguided guild leaders.

Ants are pretty cool, right? Collectively as innovative and ingenious, as industrious and as warlike as humans. A super-organism. Its a good parallel, I think.

Individually, ants are nothing - useless, helpless, incapable of independent action. So to all in the rampaging banana zergs... is that why you play this game?

Well played. Really, I'm impressed.

themdogesbite

Ive said that i dont mind nightcapping when it happens once in a while, i do mind when it hurts the overall population of the campaign. I hope my banana brethren will calm down a bit with this.

Junipus

You can just swap to an AoE bar and find a group to faceroll the AD swarm with.

Numbers only work when there's coordination, otherwise a small and well organised group can handle a disorganised mass many times their number.

Alternatively, move to the EP/DC buff server and have fun not doing anything

Lava_Croft

The nightcapping has nothing to do with AD and everything with ESO's PvP campaigns being won by the team who has the most players at night. DC and EP will do and have done the exact same thing, but now that they are not on the 'good' side of the nightcapping, it suddenly is something to cry about on the forums.

The same goes for the people who (in my case of being EP) whine in zone chat about the 'AD zergball' while they themselves do *** but run around in the same kind of zergballs, only with a different coloured shield above their head.

It's ESO's questionable design which is to blame for this, not paying customers who just play the game as it is presented to them.

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

Its only the beginning of the campaign, you can see anything can happen with AD catching up 20,000 points by the end of the last campaign yes we had a small amount of help from low pop bonus but the majority was us and DC/EP giving up.

Actually really enjoyed PVP last night, had some great fights with our new EDC group (white and light blue tabard if you saw/ fought us).

Aranita

I don't blame bananas for nightcapping and early morning capping. I blamed them for cheating and in particular for cheating with low population bonus. I blame Daggerfall for not playing at night and early morning. This is the key why bananas can take everything on the map during night/early morning. Bananas are perfect in playing PvD. And with all the bonus things they are even good in playing PvP. This is really "working as intended" and no reason to blame them.

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

daoc.cyrrob16_ESO wrote: »

I don't blame bananas for nightcapping and early morning capping. I blamed them for cheating and in particular for cheating with low population bonus. I blame Daggerfall for not playing at night and early morning. This is the key why bananas can take everything on the map during night/early morning. Bananas are perfect in playing PvD. And with all the bonus things they are even good in playing PvP. This is really "working as intended" and no reason to blame them.

That bitter taste in your mouth must be bothersome after so long. Try a banana to take the taste away tomato might help to a lesser extent.
the only way DC nightcap us is when we have low population.. but no that low pop bonus was definitely wrong. when DC were running 30+ players and us with 4 players online defending Roe. Now the tables have turned so many tears.

AbraXuSeXile

VagabondAngel wrote: »

AbraXuSeXile wrote: »

Breaking the enemies spirit is the best way to win the war

...and therein lies the problem. This isn't actually war, it's a game. One that, played this way, becomes less and less fun for all the gamers on the underside of the current banana boot.

I don't mind losing; I'm a (probably) averagely skilled player who sometimes wins and dies often. The winning of a campaign means little to me truth be told - it's only points on a meaningless scoreboard that I don't usually even look at... and some extra gold after 30 days (an amount so small I can farm it in less than a night.) I like a good fight - one in which I at least have a chance of survival. (Actually, killing the current emperor and his lacky outside Arrius last night, with the help of 2 NPC guards, was pretty fun )

What I do mind is a complete faceroll by a never ending train of bananas mimicking a horde of ants, destroying all in their path. One that also, once the map is taken, camps outside the gates of an enemy faction to make sure no-one from that faction can even join the game. And all to serve the egos of a few misguided guild leaders.

Ants are pretty cool, right? Collectively as innovative and ingenious, as industrious and as warlike as humans. A super-organism. Its a good parallel, I think.

Individually, ants are nothing - useless, helpless, incapable of independent action. So to all in the rampaging banana zergs... is that why you play this game?

Well played. Really, I'm impressed.

It is a war though, It's AvAvA. Without the war aspect we would all be standing on the bridge playing a never ending map of call of duty.

DC on Thornblade is a terrible feeling of wasted man power and stupid decisions, For example today when AD have all scrolls and Emp and all DC guilds decide Chalman is a good idea to pvp at because of a few wipes at the hands of AD.

Too much credit goes to the AD faction, But in reality blame your factions guilds for being complete muppets

heng14rwb17_ESO

Who has the most number of skilled players?
Who has the best strategy?
Who put in the best effort?
Who organised group is the strongest?

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. D !