Best Of
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Combat Refresh: Werewolf
Alright this is getting silly. Why are y’all summoning people like it’s a yugioh battle?
I’m just going to wait for official responses/changes at this point. It’s hard to take this argument seriously!
Another piece of feedback while I’m here; move the extra speed from rampage into the passive (while also increasing the speed cap for werebeasts), then replace it with a snare immunity. Werewolves being terrible against bad terrain doesn’t make much sense to me, you see.
I’m just going to wait for official responses/changes at this point. It’s hard to take this argument seriously!
Another piece of feedback while I’m here; move the extra speed from rampage into the passive (while also increasing the speed cap for werebeasts), then replace it with a snare immunity. Werewolves being terrible against bad terrain doesn’t make much sense to me, you see.
Ataskir
9
Re: Werewolf ultimate use
I guess, at a foundational level... what problem is the ultimate cost mechanic trying to solve?
It seems like a solution in search of a problem, TBH.
It obviously is intended for WWs to be able to sustain the form indefinitely. So why don't we just allow them to... do that... without having to jump through all of these artificial hoops?
It seems like a solution in search of a problem, TBH.
It obviously is intended for WWs to be able to sustain the form indefinitely. So why don't we just allow them to... do that... without having to jump through all of these artificial hoops?
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Combat Refresh: Werewolf
Werewolf changes are nearly perfect they just need access to weapon passives (devs balance it however you want), but they need that to enhance the versatility of weapon choice, enchant, trait, etc.
Re: Please make Roaring Opportunist Proc from 1 Heavy, not 2
6 people is such an annoying limit in general. Dungeons have 4 people. Trials have 12. Why does the 6 people limit on a pve set even exist?
Re: Sorc pet hate has to stop
birdmann1230 wrote: »Put pets as a world line Conjuration and change Daedric summoning to something else on the sorc. Everyone gets their pets who wants them and the sorc isn’t handicapped by it. I wish for the day my main can run a high dps in content without them instead of beam spamming.
This is the way.
Re: Anti-Teabagging Policy now encouraging even worse toxic behavior
@ZOS_Kevin @ZOS_GinaBruno
Please take another look at how to better protect players that are being negatively affected by this. It is too difficult for these players to meet the requirements for making a report and there needs to be a better system in place for doing so.
Please take another look at how to better protect players that are being negatively affected by this. It is too difficult for these players to meet the requirements for making a report and there needs to be a better system in place for doing so.
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Combat Refresh: Werewolf
Been afk for a while, jumped on pts to test some werewolf pve dps.
Pure:
DK: 140k
Sorc: 137k
Warden: 135k
NB: 132k
Templar: 130k
Necromancer: 122k (poor pure passives)
Arcanist: 122k (poor pure passives)
Subclassing:
130k~ with various skill line mixes
Pure:
DK: 140k
Sorc: 137k
Warden: 135k
NB: 132k
Templar: 130k
Necromancer: 122k (poor pure passives)
Arcanist: 122k (poor pure passives)
Subclassing:
130k~ with various skill line mixes
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Combat Refresh: Werewolf
So under normal conditions in normal fights, WW does 4-6k like every other sweaty player in duels has been doing for the past X years. Seriously doubt the missing WD will turn 4-6k dps into 10k. This clearly tells me the Sorc/WW interaction is the problem.I did 4k DPS vs the Warden
Pelican here on a better build with more WW experience pulling 6k+ DPS
xylena
5
Re: Anti-Teabagging Policy now encouraging even worse toxic behavior
Aggrovious wrote: »Why on earth would anyone care about respecting your wishes when you are dead?
It's about respecting the person playing the character. And our characters are never dead anyway. They are just temporarily defeated.
Re: Anti-Teabagging Policy now encouraging even worse toxic behavior
BXR_Lonestar wrote: »In a game that has PVP and actions not controlled by the Dev's, you should just expect to be teabagged at some point.
No, this is not an expectation.
I only wanted the action to stop, but now I see that there are some that will continue to do this not caring that some players are disturbed by it. At this point the best we can hope for is that eventually if there are enough warnings it will no longer be a thing.
[Edited to clarify]