Contaminate wrote: »

Malkiv wrote: »

Contaminate wrote: »

The whole premise of the costume is creepy at best. I know marketing teams think everyone playing their game is a hormonal 12 year old who’s never seen a woman before but please chill out

My wife went on about how much she loved this outfit for nearly 5 minutes. Different people have different tastes when it comes to style. Just because it shows skin doesn't automatically mean it's designed solely for the evil male gaze. I mean - really - you're suggesting women aren't part of the design team. Unfortunate, really.

Can’t wait to hear how Tera’s designs are targeted toward women because some women like the thong armor.

There’s a different between multiple communities liking something, and that thing being designed for a particular community. Not that this accomplished it on either front, the thing is ugly and reminds me of middle aged Walmart goers who think they’re rocking the booty shorts.

Some women do, some don't. Both options are valid, as long as it's individual's choice.
But the whole idea that female sexuality only exists to appease men is sexist af. There's plenty of women irl who buy lingerie, do makeup etc because they enjoy it (even if no one gets to see said lingerie). There are even modders like Krista (nsfw link), who actually like the whole armored bikini aesthetic.
Thing is, it's much more complicated then "catering to 12 year old boys". I don't care about this specific outfit, but I hate the notion that women, even digital ones, must be covered no matter what. Female body is not some filthy thing that must be hidden away.

Contaminate wrote: »

The whole premise of the costume is creepy at best. I know marketing teams think everyone playing their game is a hormonal 12 year old who’s never seen a woman before but please chill out

I've seen women before, and I see one every day in the mirror. But for some reason, I still like sexy costumes (not this one, though, but still). What am I doing wrong?

Costume designer: how many flaps--
Department lead: yes

it ruins what would otherwise be a fantastic outfit I was gonna buy it today but that flap was a big turn off for me.

mocap wrote: »

crowns first, gold second

never agree for something else

No. The person spending real life money should get the gold first.

The person who trades gold for crowns and gets scammed loses time played in game.
The person who trades crowns for gold and gets scammed loses real life currency.

logarifmik wrote: »

Kurat wrote: »

Oh boy, people find things to complain about.
And in the meantime, look at the shape of Solitude on the map lmao.

Careful, comrade, you can be rigiously reported for not taking such an important issue seriously. Just a friendly warning.

OP, so what exactly need to be done with such people? Tell us, please. And what if such a thing was done by an accident? How to prove guilty? And why should a player apologize to you for an obvious bug in the game? Was he mocking you, or something? No, I don't think so, his answer sounds perfectly neutral to me. The whole basis of your take is questionable.

There is no need to prove if someone is guilty, we live in a world where its guilty until proven innocent. Only one side of the story is needed and that is the side of the victim. I don't agree with it, but it's what happens daily IRL and on these forums.

And the winner for the most outfits goes to.... 🎃

Imagine being these posters who think they’ve got some right to be offended that someone was uncomfortable when someone turns a favor into something obviously sexual.

you cant do any emotes or move during animation bite

OP, are you sane at all?

The irony is that the mini-shorts is what really kills it for me. I get that's part of the point, but I think it would have looked better with a skirt (instead of the shorts and flap), or with tight pants (and no flap.) I'm underwhelmed.