Best Of
Re: U50 Bug Reports for Tamriel Tomes New Features and QoL changes
70 years is a long time to try to finish a challenge. Even one involving Sheogorath
shadoza
2
Re: U50 Bug Reports for Tamriel Tomes New Features and QoL changes
Hi folks, quick update on some Tomes related items.
Thanks again for the feedback here. We're working on clearing up some of the communication for future PTS weeks.
- We're looking into why you (including ourselves lol) can't swap between owned Tomes. The intention is you should have both the U49 and U50 PTS specific Premium Tomes owned, and should be able to swap between them using the top left button on the Tome screen (the little book with an arrow icon). Right now, doesn't seem to be working. We are investigating.
- Rerolls for Gold. Got some wires crossed when planning this out. This looks like it will make its way into PTS 3, and is not currently active.
- This is also true for the end of season experience, also known as the autoclaimer. This will be available to test in PTS 3, planned for April 30th.
Thanks again for the feedback here. We're working on clearing up some of the communication for future PTS weeks.
Re: Infinite Archive & Imperial City: Weekly Vendors between April 21 and April 28, 2026
Thank you 
Buffy121
1
Re: Infinite Archive & Imperial City: Weekly Vendors between April 21 and April 28, 2026
Thank you!
joergino
1
Re: Infinite Archive & Imperial City: Weekly Vendors between April 21 and April 28, 2026
thank you ICOol guy!
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Vengeance Campaign
I am having too much fun at the moment. I will come back and edit this post at the end of the campaign!
Re: U50 Feedback Thread for Vengeance Campaign
This isn't about features, its a technical limitation, like complaining that your car can't break the sound barrier. Devs stated that the major factor in GH lag is build system calculations. So to fix the lag they had to make a new build system. The simplified mechanics kill 2 birds with 1 stone, dealing with both the lag (performance) and the ball group problem (accessibility).If you stop expecting a good product you will never get a good product
Maybe when they have reworked all 7 classes and everyone is on modern skill designs, GH will perform better, but that is still in the future, for now they keep lowering the pop caps.
xylena
3
The Game Design of BG's is Embarrassing
Some of the design decisions behind BGs are awful and I cannot believe they haven't been fixed yet.
Item 1 - Not Leaving The Spawn
Item 2 - Entering the Map by falling off a Platform
Genuinely embarrassing game design.
Item 1 - Not Leaving The Spawn
- Playing deathmatch? Have fun waiting around for more than half the match while 1 of the enemy players sits on the spawn platform for 3+ minutes. This has to be changed as it's such a waste of time.
Item 2 - Entering the Map by falling off a Platform
- Is your team behind in a deathmatch? Well get ****ed, now you all have to be CC'd for 1.5 seconds when re-entering the fight because, after respawning, you have to enter the map by falling off a platform. And while falling, the enemies can hit you with abilities, but you can't do anything about it.
Genuinely embarrassing game design.
Mashille
9
Re: Vengeance ruleset for Dungeons/Etc.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »JustLovely wrote: »YandereGirlfriend wrote: »I did a vOC over the weekend and fully half of the group was kicked and disconnected from the instance at one point or another.
It made me think that this thread might just be on to something!
Vengeance would have got you the clear.
Vengeance PvE solves the same problems with trials and vet dungeons as it solves for PvP. So the PvE community objecting to vengeance PvE while promoting vengeance for PvP reveals their motivations.
No. The PvP community that favors of this are people who are saying in other threads that Vengeance shouldn't be a PvP campaign either.
PvE can't choose campaigns like PvP can. There is no normal mode for PvP like there already is for PvE. Additionally, the server problems aren't the same technical problems. Neither has PvE server performance been complained about at the same scale for years. So the entire thing is a false equivalency. They aren't the same thing because PvE and PvP don't have the same problems and don't function the same. Even their goals aren't the same. Things that work for PvE don't automatically work for PvP or vice versa.
Yes.
Some of us lag worse in PvE, it makes zero sense not to add the option for a Vengeance PvE if it solves performance issues. We queue for dungeons/trials, it’s a different instance than the rest of the zone right? Multiple groups can run Fungal Grotto at the same time, right? Kinda like a campaign?
PvE dungeons/trials already have a normal mode. There's no queueing into overland.
And they lag just like everything else.
Vengeance PvE is the answer.
SneaK
2
Re: Vengeance ruleset for Dungeons/Etc.
spartaxoxo wrote: »ESO_player123 wrote: »I won't comment on the PvP side of things since I do not PvP, but let's not pretend that this thread is anything other than a "we might suffer so they should too" type of thread.
As was mentioned in one of the posts above, this is a direct response to the recent Vengeance thread and to the concern that Scenario #2 is the future of PvP.
Bingo. It's a non-starter anyway because PvE does not have anywhere close to the performance issues of Cyrodiil. And PvP players have been making it clear for years that fixing performance should be their top priority. They tried for years to do just that so it's not surprising that their tests revealed that certain solutions simply aren't feasible.
Suffer? I’d like the option to have access to a better performing game in PvE and ZOS has the answer.
SneaK
5